Do Socially Responsible Investment Funds Sell Losses and Ride Gains? The Disposition Effect in SRI Funds

被引:2
|
作者
Boumda, Beatrice [1 ]
Duxbury, Darren [2 ]
Ortiz, Cristina [3 ]
Vicente, Luis [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zaragoza, Accounting & Finance Dept, Zaragoza 50005, Spain
[2] Newcastle Univ, Newcastle Univ Business Sch, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE4 5TG, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Univ Zaragoza, Accounting & Finance Dept, IEDIS, Zaragoza 50005, Spain
关键词
disposition effect; SRI mutual funds; portfolio managers; PROSPECT-THEORY; PERFORMANCE; PREFERENCES; INVESTORS; DECISION; GENDER; LONG;
D O I
10.3390/su13158142
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An increasing percentage of the total net assets under professional management is devoted to ethical investments. Socially responsible investment (SRI) funds have a dual objective: building an investment strategy based on environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) screens and providing financial returns to investors. In the current study, we investigate whether this dual objective has an influence on the behavior of mutual fund managers in the realization of gains and losses. Evidence has shown that most investors in SRI funds invest in those funds primarily because of their social concerns. If the motivations of SRI managers align with those of SRI investors, SRI managers might then have more incentives than conventional managers to hold onto losing stocks if they feel their social value compensates for the economic loss. We hypothesize that SRI managers would be less prone to the disposition effect than conventional managers. Pertaining to the disposition effect, we do not find evidence of a difference in the behavior of SRI fund managers compared with that of conventional fund managers. Our results hold, even when considering market trends, management structure, gender, and prior performance.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Rise of Socially Responsible Investment Funds: The Paradoxical Role of the Financial Logic
    Yan, Shipeng
    Ferraro, Fabrizio
    Almandoz, Juan
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2019, 64 (02) : 466 - 501
  • [22] Socially responsible investment funds: Investor reaction to current and past returns
    Benson, Kareii L.
    Humphrey, Jacquelyn E.
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2008, 32 (09) : 1850 - 1859
  • [23] Sovereign Wealth Funds and Socially Responsible Investment: Dos and Don'ts
    Van Der Zee, Eva
    EUROPEAN COMPANY LAW, 2012, 9 (02): : 141 - 150
  • [24] Do ethics imply persistence? The case of Islamic and socially responsible funds
    Abdelsalam, Omneya
    Duygun, Meryem
    Carlos Matallin-Saez, Juan
    Tortosa-Ausina, Emili
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2014, 40 : 182 - 194
  • [25] Performance and performance persistence of socially responsible investment funds in Europe and North America
    Lean, Hooi Hooi
    Ang, Wei Rong
    Smyth, Russell
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2015, 34 : 254 - 266
  • [26] ETHICAL, ECOLOGICAL AND SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT FUNDS IN EUROPE (1999-2007)
    Ferruz Agudo, Luis
    Marco Sanjuan, Isabel
    Munoz Sanchez, Fernando
    APOSTA-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES, 2009, 41
  • [27] Evaluation of the Cultural Environment’s Impact on the Performance of the Socially Responsible Investment Funds
    Francisco José López-Arceiz
    Ana José Bellostas-Pérezgrueso
    José Mariano Moneva
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 150 : 259 - 278
  • [28] Pensions at Work: Socially Responsible Investment of Union-Based Pension Funds
    Hanin, Frederic
    RELATIONS INDUSTRIELLES-INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2009, 64 (02): : 340 - 341
  • [29] Socially responsible and conventional investment funds: performance comparison and the global financial crisis
    Becchetti, Leonardo
    Ciciretti, Rocco
    Dalo, Ambrogio
    Herzel, Stefano
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2015, 47 (25) : 2541 - 2562
  • [30] Is corporate social responsibility sufficient enough to explain the investment by socially responsible funds?
    Tosun O.K.
    Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2017, 49 (3) : 697 - 726