Parameter back-analysis of hardening soil model for granite residual soil and its engineering applications

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu Min [1 ,2 ]
Chen Xiang-sheng [1 ,2 ]
Zhang Guo-tao [1 ,2 ]
Pang Xiao-chao [3 ]
Su Dong [1 ,2 ]
Liu Ji-qiang [4 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Civil & Transportat Engn, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Coastal Urban Resilient Infrastruct, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] China Acad Railway Sci Shenzhen Res & Design Inst, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] China Railway Southern Investment Grp Co Ltd, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
granite residual soil; self-boring pressure meter test; hardening soil model; parameter back-analysis; foundation excavation; shield tunnel; SMALL-STRAIN STIFFNESS; NUMERICAL-ANALYSIS; HSS MODEL; EXCAVATION;
D O I
10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1062
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
In recent years, construction works near the operating metro tunnel in granite residual soil have been gradually increasing, and the impact of these construction works on the safety of shield tunnel should not be ignored. Finite element method is an effective method to evaluate the influence of adjacent construction on shield tunnel, but its reliability highly depends on the reasonable selection of soil constitutive model and parameters. In this paper, the current situation of parameter selection of hardening soil model for granite residual soil is firstly reviewed. Then a back-analysis method for determining the parameters of granite residual soil based on the self-boring pressure meter test (SBPT) is proposed. Finally, the obtained back-analysis parameters are applied to the engineering case of foundation pit excavated overpass existing shield tunnel for method verification, and more reasonable values of parameters of hardening soil model for granite residual soil are determined. The results show that the strength parameters of hardening soil model for granite residual soil can be determined by laboratory tests, and the stiffness parameters of E-50(ref ), E-oed(ref) and E-ur(ref) are the key parameters for the back-analysis. The ratio of E-50(ref ): E-oed(ref) : E-ur(ref) is suitable for engineering practice, and the value of E-50(ref ) ranges from 36 MPa to 43 MPa according to different ratios.
引用
收藏
页码:1061 / 1072
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Chamber studies of the effects of pressuremeter geometry on test results in sand
    Ajalloeian, R
    Yu, HS
    [J]. GEOTECHNIQUE, 1998, 48 (05): : 621 - 636
  • [2] [安然 An Ran], 2020, [岩土工程学报, Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering], V42, P109
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, THESIS U STUTTGART
  • [4] Investigation of response of metro tunnels due to adjacent large excavation and protective measures in soft soils
    Chen, Renpeng
    Meng, Fanyan
    Li, Zhongchao
    Ye, Yuehong
    Ye, Junneng
    [J]. TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 58 : 224 - 235
  • [5] Chen Shuan, 2021, Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, V55, P698, DOI 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2020.026
  • [6] Department of housing and urban rural development of Guangdong Province, 2017, DBJ15312016 DEP HOUS
  • [7] [丁智 Ding Zhi], 2021, [中国公路学报, China Journal of Highway and Transport], V34, P50
  • [8] [董飞 Dong Fei], 2017, [土木工程学报, China Civil Engineering Journal], V50, P104
  • [9] Gu XQ, 2021, ROCK SOIL MECH, V42, P833, DOI 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0741
  • [10] HAO Dong-xue, 2008, STUDY CAVITY EXPANSI