The ability to screw-retain single implant-supported restorations in the anterior maxilla: A CBCT analysis

被引:16
|
作者
Edmondson, Erin K. [1 ]
Trejo, Pedro M. [1 ,2 ]
Soldatos, Nikolaos [1 ]
Weltman, Robin L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Houston, Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont & Dent Hyg, Houston, TX USA
[2] Periodontal & Implant Surg Houston, 2600 South Gessner Rd,Suite 304, Houston, TX 77063 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2022年 / 128卷 / 03期
关键词
IMMEDIATE IMPLANT; TOOTH EXTRACTION; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; POST-EXTRACTION; EXCESS CEMENT; PLACEMENT; COMPLICATIONS; ABUTMENTS; CLASSIFICATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.004
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Evidence to validate the routine use of angled screw-channel abutments in the anterior maxilla is sparse. If properly planned, they might provide surgical and prosthetic benefits. Purpose. The purpose of this observational study was to determine the prevalence of digitally placed implants in the anterior maxilla that would allow screw-retained implant-supported restorations with either a straight or an angled screw-channel abutment. Material and methods. Two hundred cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans met the inclusion criteria for retrospective analysis and digital implant planning. Virtual implants were planned for randomly selected anterior maxillary teeth by using the anatomic crown and root position. Virtual abutments of varying angulation were attached to the implants to determine the ability to screw retain a restoration with either a straight or an angled screw-channel abutment. Results. One hundred fifty-two (76%) sites required an angled screw-channel abutment to enable screw retention. Forty-eight (24%) sites allowed screw retention with a straight abutment. The percentage of implants requiring angled or straight abutments varied significantly among anterior teeth (P<.005). One hundred nine (71.7%) angled screw-channel abutment sites required a 5-degree abutment, 41 (26.9%) required a 10-degree abutment, and 2 (1.3%) required a 15 -degree abutment. Among the anterior teeth, lateral incisors presented a greater need for angled screw-channel abutments. None of the implants in the present study needed cement-retained restorations. Conclusions. Angled abutments allowed for screw-retained restorations on digitally planned implants in the anterior maxilla. The required angular correction to a screw-retained restoration was <15 degrees. Screw-retained restorations were frequently achievable (76%) with the use of angled screw-channel abutments or with straight abutments (24%), and lateral incisors presented a greater need for angled screw-channel abutments. (J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:443-9)
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 449
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Descriptive Analysis of Implant and Prosthodontic Survival Rates With Fixed Implant-Supported Rehabilitations in the Edentulous Maxilla
    Lambert, France E.
    Weber, Hans-Peter
    Susarla, Srinivas A.
    Belser, Urs C.
    Gallucci, German O.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2009, 80 (08) : 1220 - 1230
  • [32] Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla
    de Souza Batista, Victor Eduardo
    Verri, Fellippo Ramos
    de Faria Almeida, Daniel Augusto
    Santiago Junior, Joel Ferreira
    Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo
    Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 20 (06) : 663 - 670
  • [33] Regenerative approaches for rehabilitation with single implant-supported prosthesis in the maxilla: a comprehensive clinical description
    Henrique Cassebe Ledo Pelegrine
    Gabriela Ezequiel Oliveira
    Luiz Antonio Borelli Barros Filho
    Luiz Antonio Borelli Barros
    Erica Dorigatti de Avila
    Rafael Scaf de Molon
    Periodontal and Implant Research, 8 (1)
  • [34] Long-Term Outcome of Cemented Versus Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Partial Restorations
    Nissan, Joseph
    Narobai, Demitri
    Gross, Ora
    Ghelfan, Oded
    Chaushu, Gavriel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2011, 26 (05) : 1102 - 1107
  • [35] Effects of Abutment and Screw Access Channel Modification on Dislodgement of Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations
    Wadhwani, Chandur
    Hess, Timothy
    Pineyro, Alfonso
    Chung, Kwok-Hung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2013, 26 (01) : 54 - 56
  • [36] Dynamic Abutment: A method of redirecting screw access for implant-supported restorations: Technical details and a clinical report
    Berroeta, Eva
    Zabalegui, Ion
    Donovan, Terrence
    Chee, Winston
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2015, 113 (06): : 516 - 519
  • [37] Effect of screw access hole design on the fracture resistance of implant-supported zirconia-based restorations
    Saboury, Abolfazl
    Mahshid, Minoo
    Tabatabaian, Farhad
    Moghadam, Leila
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 30 (06) : 545 - 550
  • [38] Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations
    Sghaireen, Mohd G.
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (03) : 554 - 561
  • [39] Effect of an antirotation resistance form on screw loosening for single implant-supported crowns
    Aboyoussef, H
    Weiner, S
    Ehrenberg, D
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2000, 83 (04): : 450 - 455
  • [40] Factors Influencing the Screw Stability of Implant-Supported Single Crowns: An In Vitro Study
    Bishti, Shaza
    Alsagher, Mohamad Shams Eddin
    Homa, Martin
    Wolfart, Stefan
    Tuna, Taskin
    MATERIALS, 2025, 18 (03)