A framework for screening and portfolio selection in corporate venture capital

被引:1
|
作者
Herberger, Tim Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Reinle, Felix [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Andrassy Univ Budapest, Dept Business Adm, Budapest, Hungary
[2] Otto Friedrich Univ Bamberg, Dept Finance, Bamberg, Germany
[3] Zeppelin Univ, Dept Econ & Business, Friedrichshafen, Germany
关键词
Corporate venture capital; Portfolio management; Investment decision; Data envelopment analysis; Classification G11; G12; G32; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; START-UP FIRMS; DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; DEA; INFORMATION; CRITERIA; ACQUISITIONS;
D O I
10.1108/SEF-06-2019-0224
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to outline and demonstrate a method for screening and selection of potential portfolio companies (PCs) during the screening phase in corporate venture capital. Design/methodology/approach The use of the data envelopment analysis (DEA) enables the consideration of individual, heterogeneous and multidimensional decision criteria in portfolio selection and the preceding screening process by the investor. Findings The result of this method is a relative ranking of the PCs, with all the PCs considered serving as peer group. A weighting of individual criteria is not necessary because it is part of the functionality of DEA. The authors validate the proposed approach in a case study and show that it can be well combined with other models and theoretical frameworks. Practical implications The method is particularly useful in two cases. First, if a highly specialized investor wishes to use a variety of individual selection criteria for portfolio selection. Second, if an investor only has insufficient (financial) data on potential PCs, but still wants to make a (pre-) selection based on observable (qualitative) characteristics. This model helps to make consistent, intersubjectively comprehensible decisions based on valid decision criteria and helps to optimize the decision-making process in the context of portfolio selection in CVC. Originality/value This method allows the systematic selection of an attractive group from a large number of potential PCs, based on observable characteristics and taking into account individual strategic investment objectives, without having to make assumptions about underlying distributions or weights of decision criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 495
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] VENTURE CAPITAL INVESTING FOR CORPORATE DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
    WINTERS, TE
    MURFIN, DL
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 1988, 3 (03) : 207 - 222
  • [42] Corporate venture capital: The role of governance factors
    Anokhin, Sergey
    Peck, Simon
    Wincent, Joakim
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (11) : 4744 - 4749
  • [43] Corporate venture capital, disclosure, and financial reporting
    Hamm, Sophia J. W.
    Jung, Michael J.
    Park, Min
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2021, 29 (06) : 541 - 566
  • [44] Voluntary disclosure of corporate venture capital investments
    Mohamed, Abdulkadir
    Schwienbacher, Armin
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2016, 68 : 69 - 83
  • [45] The impact of corporate venture capital involvement in syndicates
    Kang, Shinhyung
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2019, 57 (01) : 131 - 151
  • [46] Idiosyncratic portfolio characteristics of seed and venture capital funds
    Erikson, Truls
    JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 12 (04) : 545 - +
  • [47] Upper echelons and portfolio strategies of venture capital firms
    Patzelt, Holger
    Knyphausen-Aufsess, Dodo Zu
    Fischer, Heiko T.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2009, 24 (06) : 558 - 572
  • [48] The determinants of venture capital portfolio size: Empirical evidence
    Cumming, DJ
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2006, 79 (03): : 1083 - 1126
  • [49] Venture capital investments and the technological performance of portfolio firms
    Lahr, Henry
    Mina, Andrea
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (01) : 303 - 318
  • [50] WHEN CORPORATE VENTURE CAPITAL DOESNT WORK
    HARDYMON, GF
    DENINO, MJ
    SALTER, MS
    HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 1983, 61 (03) : 114 - 120