Diffusion-weighted MRI for quantification of liver fibrosis: Preliminary experience

被引:287
|
作者
Taouli, Bachir
Tolia, Anuj J.
Losada, Mariela
Babb, James S.
Chan, Edwin S.
Bannan, Michael A.
Tobias, Hillel
机构
[1] NYU Med Ctr, MRI, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] NYU, Med Ctr, Dept Pharmacol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[4] NYU, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Hepatol, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
cirrhosis; diffusion; fibrosis; liver; MRI;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.07.2086
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our preliminary experience using diffusion-weighted MRI for quantification of liver fibrosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Diffusion-weighted MRI with single-shot echo-planar technique at b values of 50, 300, 500, 700, and 1,000 S/mm(2) was prospectively performed on 23 patients with chronic hepatitis and on seven healthy volunteers. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured in four locations in the liver. Liver biopsy results (n = 19) were retrospectively reviewed by two hepatopathologists in consensus to determine stage of fibrosis and grade of inflammation. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the ADCs between patients classified with respect to having stage 2 or greater versus stage 1 or less fibrosis and stage 3 or greater versus stage or less 2 fibrosis. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to assess the performance of ADC in prediction of the presence of stage 2 or greater and stage 3 or greater fibrosis. RESULTS. Using a b value of 500 S/mm(2) and all combined b values, we found significantly lower hepatic ADCs in stage 2 or greater versus stage I or less fibrosis and stage 3 or greater versus stage 2 or less fibrosis. The mean ADCs (x 10(-3) mm(2)/S) with all b values were 1.47 +/- 0.11 (SD) versus 1.65 +/- 0.10 for stage 2 or greater versus stage 1 or less fibrosis (p < 0.001) and 1.44 +/- 0.07 versus 1.66 +/- 0.10 for stage 3 or greater versus stage 2 or less fibrosis (p < 0.001). Hepatic ADC was a significant predictor of stage 2 or greater and stage 3 or greater fibrosis, with areas under the curve of 0.896 and 0.896, sensitivity of 83.3% and 88.9%, and specificity of 83.3% and 80.0% (ADC with all b values, 1.54-1.53 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s or less). CONCLUSION. Diffusion-weighted MRI can be used for prediction of the presence of moderate and advanced liver fibrosis.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 806
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Role of Diffusion-Weighted MRI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Assessment of Diabetic Kidney Disease: Preliminary Experience Study
    Osman, Nasr Mohamed Mohamed
    Kader, Moustafa Abdel
    Nasr, Taghreed A. El Aziz
    Sharawy, Mohamed Ahmed
    Keryakos, Hesham Kamal Habeeb
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY AND RENOVASCULAR DISEASE, 2021, 14 : 1 - 10
  • [32] THE ROLE OF DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MRI AND APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT IN ASSESSMENT OF DIABETIC KIDNEY DISEASE: PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE STUDY
    Taha, Mohamed
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 36 : 372 - 372
  • [33] Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Staging of Liver Fibrosis
    Bonekamp, Susanne
    Torbenson, Michael S.
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 45 (10) : 885 - 892
  • [34] The Mystery of Diffusion-Weighted MRI
    Sheerani, Mughis
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 102 (09) : 880 - 880
  • [35] Diffusion-weighted MRI in thymomas
    Carbonetti, Francesco
    Di Girolamo, Marco
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2016, 102 (01): : E4 - E4
  • [36] DPD of diffusion-weighted MRI
    Azhar, M.
    Shakil, S.
    Greiner, A.
    Kauzlaric, D.
    Korvink, J. G.
    COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2018, 172 : 467 - 473
  • [37] ANISOTROPY IN DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MRI
    MOSELEY, ME
    KUCHARCZYK, J
    ASGARI, HS
    NORMAN, D
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1991, 19 (02) : 321 - 326
  • [38] Diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate
    Mueller-Lisse, U. G.
    Mueller-Lisse, U. L.
    Zamecnik, P.
    Schlemmer, H. -P. W.
    Scherr, M. K.
    RADIOLOGE, 2011, 51 (03): : 205 - 214
  • [39] Diffusion-weighted breast imaging at 3 T: Preliminary experience
    Nogueira, L.
    Brandao, S.
    Matos, E.
    Nunes, R. G.
    Ferreira, H. A.
    Loureiro, J.
    Ramos, I.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 69 (04) : 378 - 384
  • [40] Diffusion-weighted MRI for uveal melanoma liver metastasis detection
    Wagner, Mathilde
    Mariani, Pascale
    Bidard, Francois Clement
    Rodrigues, Manuel Jorge
    Farkhondeh, Fereshteh
    Cassoux, Nathalie
    Piperno-Neumann, Sophie
    Petras, Slavomir
    Servois, Vincent
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (08) : 2263 - 2273