Optimal Quantum Control with Poor Statistics

被引:25
|
作者
Sauvage, Frederic [1 ]
Mintert, Florian [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Phys Dept, Blackett Lab, Prince Consort Rd, London SW7 2BW, England
来源
PRX QUANTUM | 2020年 / 1卷 / 02期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
DYNAMICS; APPROXIMATION; GENERATION; STATES; GAS;
D O I
10.1103/PRXQuantum.1.020322
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Control of quantum systems is a central element of high-precision experiments and the development of quantum technological applications. Control pulses that are typically temporally or spatially modulated are often designed based on theoretical simulations. As we gain control over larger and more complex quantum systems, however, we reach the limitations of our capabilities of theoretical modeling and simulations, and learning how to control a quantum system based exclusively on experimental data can help us to exceed those limitations. Because of the intrinsic probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics, it is fundamentally necessary to repeat measurements on individual quantum systems many times in order to estimate the expectation value of an observable with good accuracy. Control algorithms requiring accurate data can thus imply an experimental effort that negates the benefits of avoiding theoretical modeling. We present a control algorithm that finds optimal control solutions in the presence of large measurement shot noise and even in the limit of single-shot measurements. The algorithm builds up on Bayesian optimization that is well suited to handle noisy data; but since the commonly used assumption of Gaussian noise is not appropriate for projective measurements with a low number of repetitions, we develop Bayesian inference that respects the binomial nature of shot noise. With several numerical and experimental examples we demonstrate that this method is capable of finding excellent control solutions with minimal experimental effort.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quantum parameter estimation with optimal control
    Liu, Jing
    Yuan, Haidong
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2017, 96 (01)
  • [42] Glassy Phase of Optimal Quantum Control
    Day, Alexandre G. R.
    Bukov, Marin
    Weinberg, Phillip
    Mehta, Pankaj
    Sels, Dries
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2019, 122 (02)
  • [43] POOR STATISTICS - REPLY
    THOMPSON, J
    COMMENTARY, 1969, 47 (05) : 4 - 4
  • [44] Quantum optimal control: Hessian analysis of the control landscape
    Shen, Zhenwen
    Hsieh, Michael
    Rabitz, Herschel
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 124 (20):
  • [45] Optimal control of linear Gaussian quantum systems via quantum learning control
    Liu, Yu-Hong
    Zeng, Yexiong
    Tan, Qing-Shou
    Dong, Daoyi
    Nori, Franco
    Liao, Jie-Qiao
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2024, 109 (06)
  • [46] Optimal Lyapunov-based quantum control for quantum systems
    Hou, S. C.
    Khan, M. A.
    Yi, X. X.
    Dong, Daoyi
    Petersen, Ian R.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2012, 86 (02):
  • [47] Optimal Quantum Control: Designing lasers for controlling quantum systems
    Rai, Renuka
    2014 RECENT ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING AND COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCES (RAECS), 2014,
  • [48] Hybrid Quantum-Classical Approach to Quantum Optimal Control
    Li, Jun
    Yang, Xiaodong
    Peng, Xinhua
    Sun, Chang-Pu
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2017, 118 (15)
  • [49] Optimal control of universal quantum gates in a double quantum dot
    Castelano, Leonardo K.
    de Lima, Emanuel F.
    Madureira, Justino R.
    Degani, Marcos H.
    Maialle, Marcelo Z.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2018, 97 (23)
  • [50] Optimal Control for Open Quantum Systems: Qubits and Quantum Gates
    Roloff, R.
    Wenin, M.
    Poetz, W.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND THEORETICAL NANOSCIENCE, 2009, 6 (08) : 1837 - 1863