A comparison of machine learning models for the mapping of groundwater spring potential

被引:35
|
作者
Al-Fugara, A'kif [1 ]
Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza [2 ]
Al-Shabeeb, Abdel Rahman [3 ]
Habib, Maan [4 ]
Al-Adamat, Rida [3 ]
AI-Amoush, Hani [5 ]
Collins, Adrian L. [6 ]
机构
[1] Al Al Bayt Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Surveying Engn, Mafraq 25113, Jordan
[2] Shiraz Univ, Coll Agr, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Engn, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Al Al Bayt Univ, Inst Earth & Environm Sci, Dept GIS & Remote Sensing, Mafraq 25113, Jordan
[4] Al Balqa Appl Univ, Dept Surveying & Geomat Engn, Al Salt 19117, Jordan
[5] Al Al Bayt Univ, Inst Earth & Environm Sci, Dept Earth Sci & Environm, Mafraq 25113, Jordan
[6] Rothamsted Res, Sustainable Agr Sci, Okehampton EX20 2SB, Devon, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Machine learning models; Groundwater mapping; Geographic information system; Variable importance; Jordan; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; RANDOM FOREST; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; SPATIAL PREDICTION; FREQUENCY RATIO; NEURAL-NETWORKS; GIS TECHNIQUES; WEST-BENGAL; RECHARGE; VULNERABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-020-08944-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Groundwater resources are vitally important in arid and semi-arid areas meaning that spatial planning tools are required for their exploration and mapping. Accordingly, this research compared the predictive powers of five machine learning models for groundwater potential spatial mapping in Wadi az-Zarqa watershed in Jordan. The five models were random forest (RF), boosted regression tree (BRT), support vector machine (SVM), mixture discriminant analysis (MDA), and multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS). These algorithms explored spatial distributions of 12 hydrological-geological-physiographical (HGP) conditioning factors (slope, altitude, profile curvature, plan curvature, slope aspect, slope length (SL), lithology, soil texture, average annual rainfall, topographic wetness index (TWI), distance to drainage network, and distance to faults) that determine where groundwater springs are located. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to evaluate the prediction accuracies of the five individual models. Here the results were ranked in descending order as MDA (83.2%), RF (80.6%), SVM (80.2%), BRT (78.0%), and MARS (75.5%).The results show good potential for further use of machine learning techniques for mapping groundwater spring potential in other places where the use and management of groundwater resources is essential for sustaining rural or urban life.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Groundwater potential mapping using machine learning approach in West Java, Indonesia
    Nugroho, Jalu Tejo
    Lestari, Anugrah Indah
    Gustiandi, Budhi
    Sofan, Parwati
    Suwarsono
    Prasasti, Indah
    Rahmi, Khalifah Insan Nur
    Noviar, Heru
    Sari, Nurwita Mustika
    Manalu, R. Johannes
    Arifin, Samsul
    Taufiq, Ahmad
    Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 2024, 27
  • [22] Combination of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms and Machine Learning Methods for Groundwater Potential Mapping
    AlAyyash, Saad
    Al-Fugara, A'kif
    Shatnawi, Rania
    Al-Shabeeb, Abdel Rahman
    Al-Adamat, Rida
    Al-Amoush, Hani
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [23] Optimized Conditioning Factors Using Machine Learning Techniques for Groundwater Potential Mapping
    Kalantar, Bahareh
    Al-Najjar, Husam A. H.
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Saeidi, Vahideh
    Halin, Alfian Abdul
    Ueda, Naonori
    Naghibi, Seyed Amir
    WATER, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [24] GIS-BASED GROUNDWATER POTENTIAL MAPPING USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS, A CASE STUDY: QOM PROVINCE, IRAN
    Masoudian, E.
    Pahlavani, P.
    ISPRS GEOSPATIAL CONFERENCE 2022, JOINT 6TH SENSORS AND MODELS IN PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, SMPR/4TH GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION RESEARCH, GIRESEARCH CONFERENCES, VOL. 10-4, 2023, : 489 - 494
  • [25] Mapping and modeling groundwater potential using machine learning, deep learning and ensemble learning models in the Saiss basin (Fez-Meknes region, Morocco)
    Ragragui, Hind
    Aouragh, My Hachem
    El-Hmaidi, Abdellah
    Ouali, Lamya
    Saouita, Jihane
    Iallamen, Zineb
    Ousmana, Habiba
    Jaddi, Hajar
    El Ouali, Anas
    GROUNDWATER FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 26
  • [26] Groundwater Salinity Susceptibility Mapping Using Classifier Ensemble and Bayesian Machine Learning Models
    Mosavi, Amirhosein
    Hosseini, Farzaneh Sajedi
    Choubin, Bahram
    Goodarzi, Massoud
    Dineva, Adrienn A.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 145564 - 145576
  • [27] Ensemble Boosting and Bagging Based Machine Learning Models for Groundwater Potential Prediction
    Mosavi, Amirhosein
    Sajedi Hosseini, Farzaneh
    Choubin, Bahram
    Goodarzi, Massoud
    Dineva, Adrienn A.
    Rafiei Sardooi, Elham
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2021, 35 (01) : 23 - 37
  • [28] Ensemble Boosting and Bagging Based Machine Learning Models for Groundwater Potential Prediction
    Amirhosein Mosavi
    Farzaneh Sajedi Hosseini
    Bahram Choubin
    Massoud Goodarzi
    Adrienn A. Dineva
    Elham Rafiei Sardooi
    Water Resources Management, 2021, 35 : 23 - 37
  • [29] Groundwater potential mapping in the Central Highlands of Vietnam using spatially explicit machine learning
    Tran Xuan Bien
    Abolfazl Jaafari
    Tran Van Phong
    Phan Trong Trinh
    Binh Thai Pham
    Earth Science Informatics, 2023, 16 : 131 - 146
  • [30] Application of machine learning techniques in groundwater potential mapping along the west coast of India
    Prasad, Pankaj
    Loveson, Victor Joseph
    Kotha, Mahender
    Yadav, Ramanand
    GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 57 (06) : 735 - 752