Shock generation comparison with planar and hemispherical targets in shock ignition relevant experiment

被引：8

作者：

Baton, S. D. ^{[1
,2
]}

Le Bel, E. ^{[3
]}

Brygoo, S. ^{[4
]}

Ribeyre, X. ^{[3
]}

Rousseaux, C. ^{[4
]}

Breil, J. ^{[3
]}

Koenig, M. ^{[1
,2
]}

Batani, D. ^{[3
]}

Raffestin, D. ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Paris Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Ecole Polytech,LULI, F-91128 Palaiseau, France

[2] UPMC Univ Paris 06, Sorbonne Univ, CNRS, LULI, Pl Jussieu, F-75252 Paris 05, France

[3] Univ Bordeaux, CNRS, CEA, Ctr Lasers Intenses & Applicat CELIA, F-33405 Talence, France

[4] CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France

[5] CEA, DAM, CESTA, F-33114 Le Barp, France

来源：

PHYSICS OF PLASMAS | 2017年 / 24卷 / 09期

关键词：

INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION; DRIVE;

D O I：

10.1063/1.4989525

中图分类号：

O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];

学科分类号：

070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;

摘要：

We performed an experiment on the "Ligne d'Integration Laser" facility to produce strong shocks with plasma conditions relevant for the Shock Ignition approach to Inertial Confinement Fusion. Two kinds of targets have been used: planar and hemispherical. We observe an increase in the shock velocity in hemispherical geometry, which entails a fairly planar shock despite the Gaussian focal spot. Numerical results reproduce the shock dynamics in the two cases in a successful way, indicating, for laser intensities around 1.5 x 10(15) W/cm(2) at 3 omega, an ablation pressure of (90620) Mbar and (120+/-20) Mbar in planar and hemispherical geometry, respectively. Published by AIP Publishing.

引用

页数：6

共 50 条

[21] Shock ignition: a brief overview and progress in the design of robust targets
Atzeni, S.
Marocchino, A.
Schiavi, A.
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2015, 57 (01)
[22] Shock focusing in a planar convergent geometry: experiment and simulation
Bond, C.
Hill, D. J.
Meiron, D. I.
Dimotakis, P. E.
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2009, 641 : 297 - 333
[23] Experimental observation of parametric instabilities at laser intensities relevant for shock ignition
Cristoforetti, G.
Colaitis, A.
Antonelli, L.
Atzeni, S.
Baffigi, F.
Batani, D.
Barbato, F.
Boutoux, G.
Dudzak, R.
Koester, P.
Krousky, E.
Labate, L.
Nicolai, Ph.
Renner, O.
Skoric, M.
Tikhonchuk, V.
Gizzi, L. A.
EPL, 2017, 117 (03)
[24] X-ray time-resolved diagnostics of hot electron generation in shock ignition relevant experiments
Filippov, E. D.
Martynenko, A. S.
Cervenak, M.
Antonelli, L.
Baffigi, F.
Cristoferetti, G.
Gizzi, L. A.
Pisarczyk, T.
Mancelli, D.
Ospina, V.
Krus, M.
Dudzak, R.
Pikuz, S. A.
Batani, D.
Renner, O.
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE LASER OPTICS 2020 (ICLO 2020), 2020,
[25] Planar radiative shock experiments and their comparison to simulations
Reighard, A. B.
Drake, R. P.
Mucino, J. E.
Knauer, J. P.
Busquet, M.
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2007, 14 (05)
[26] Radiation Hydrodynamic Simulations in the Planar Scheme for the Fundamental Studies of Shock Ignition
董云松
杨家敏
宋天明
朱托
黄成武
Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18 (04) : 376 - 381
[27] Radiation Hydrodynamic Simulations in the Planar Scheme for the Fundamental Studies of Shock Ignition
Dong Yunsong
Yang Jiamin
Song Tianming
Zhu Tuo
Huang Chengwu
PLASMA SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 18 (04) : 376 - 381
[28] Radiation Hydrodynamic Simulations in the Planar Scheme for the Fundamental Studies of Shock Ignition
董云松
杨家敏
宋天明
朱托
黄成武
Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, (04) : 376 - 381
[29] Cryogenic Targets of Shock Ignition: Modeling of Diffusive Filling with a Hydrogen Fuel
I. V. Aleksandrova
E. R. Koresheva
Physics of Atomic Nuclei, 2022, 85 (Suppl 1) : S90 - S100
[30] Estimation of the FST-Layering Time for Shock Ignition ICF Targets
Aleksandrova, Irina
Koresheva, Elena
SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2022, 14 (07):

← 1 2 3 4 5 →