Stochastic post-disaster functionality recovery of community building portfolios I: Modeling

被引:74
|
作者
Lin, Peihui [1 ]
Wang, Naiyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Civil Engn & Environm Sci, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
Recovery modeling; Building portfolio; Functionality state; Building restoration; Continuous time Markov Chain; Community resilience; SEISMIC RESILIENCE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.05.002
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Understanding the process of post-disaster recovery is a critical step toward assessing and achieving community resilience. However, the recovery process of a community building portfolio as a spatially distributed system is intrinsically complex and highly uncertain, and is conditional on the resourcefulness and social-economic characteristics of the community as well as the various decisions made by numerous community stakeholders and building owners at different phases of the recovery. We propose a simulation-based building portfolio recovery model (BPRM) to predict the functionality recovery time and recovery trajectory of a community building portfolio following natural scenario hazard events, in two steps: (1) modeling individual building-level restoration as a discrete state, continuous time Markov Chain (CTMC); and (2) modeling building portfolio-level recovery through aggregating the CTMC restoration processes of individual buildings across the domain of the community and over the entire recovery time horizon. We propagate uncertainties associated with the recovery process in a consistent manner in order to quantify portfolio recovery metrics probabilistically. The proposed building portfolio recovery model is intended to support risk-informed community resilience planning and hazard mitigation. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 105
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Developing indicators to measure post-disaster community recovery in the United States
    Horney, Jennifer
    Dwyer, Caroline
    Aminto, Meghan
    Berke, Philip
    Smith, Gavin
    DISASTERS, 2017, 41 (01) : 124 - 149
  • [33] Chain tourism in post-disaster recovery
    Zavar, Elyse
    Lavy, Brendan L.
    Hagelman, Ronald R., III
    TOURIST STUDIES, 2020, 20 (04) : 429 - 449
  • [34] Post-disaster recovery: the challenge of anticipation
    Moatty, Annabelle
    Vinet, Freddy
    3RD EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT (FLOODRISK 2016), 2016, 7
  • [35] Information Deficits and Post-Disaster Recovery
    Arneson, Erin
    Deniz, Derya
    Javernick-Will, Amy
    Liel, Abbie
    Dashti, Shideh
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2016: OLD AND NEW CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES CONVERGE IN HISTORIC SAN JUAN, 2016, : 1546 - 1555
  • [36] Community participation in post-disaster reconstruction
    Sadiqi, Zabihullah
    Trigunarsyah, Bambang
    Coffey, Vaughan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-MUNICIPAL ENGINEER, 2016, 169 (03) : 173 - 186
  • [37] Re-conceptualising "Building Back Better" to improve post-disaster recovery
    Mannakkara, Sandeeka
    Wilkinson, Suzanne
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2014, 7 (03) : 327 - 341
  • [38] E-Defense Shake-table Test of a Building Designed for Post-disaster Functionality
    Yeow, Trevor Zhiqing
    Kusunoki, Koichi
    Nakamura, Izumi
    Hibino, Yo
    Fukai, Satoru
    Safi, Walid Ahmad
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2022, 26 (10) : 5153 - 5174
  • [39] Gaps in post-disaster community changes in "building back better" in Ayeyarwaddy, Myanmar
    Yang, Yunjeong
    DISASTER PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 29 (04) : 523 - 539
  • [40] Reframing "building back better" for post-disaster housing design: a community perspective
    Rahmayati, Yenny
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RESILIENCE IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 7 (04) : 344 - 360