Expression of the forkhead transcription factor FOXL2 correlates with good prognosis in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen

被引:7
|
作者
Wegman, Pia [1 ]
Eremo, Anna Gothlin [1 ]
Lindlof, Angelica [2 ]
Karlsson, Mats [3 ]
Stal, Olle [4 ]
Wingren, Sten [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Orebro, Sch Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Clin Med, S-70185 Orebro, Sweden
[2] Skovde Univ, Sch Life Sci, Syst Biol Res Ctr, S-54145 Skovde, Sweden
[3] Orebro Univ Hosp, Sch Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Pathol, S-70185 Orebro, Sweden
[4] Linkoping Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin & Expt Med Oncol, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
breast cancer; forkhead box L2; aromatase; tissue specific promoters; in silico; LIVER RECEPTOR HOMOLOG-1; AROMATASE EXPRESSION; OVARIAN DEVELOPMENT; GENE-TRANSCRIPTION; INVERSUS SYNDROME; MESSENGER-RNA; TISSUE; PROMOTER;
D O I
10.3892/ijo.2011.923
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aromatase is an important enzyme in the local synthesis of oestrogens and its expression has been shown to be increased in breast cancer through the activation of multiple promoters. However, the mechanisms behind this are not yet fully understood. A novel candidate in this context is the transcription factor forkhead box L2 (FOXL2), which has been recognised to be co-expressed with aromatase and transcriptionally active promoter 11 in developing goat and chicken ovaries. We propose that FOXL2 could be involved in the increased expression of aromatase in breast cancer. We examined FOXL2 and its relation to aromatase in 132 postmenopausal breast cancer patients by immunohistochemistry. Using in silico analysis, we further searched for FOXL2 binding-elements in the aromatase gene promoters. The results demonstrate that FOXL2 is expressed in breast cancer and influences clinical outcome with improved recurrence-free survival in cases with nuclear expression. In a multivariate Cox model, nuclear FOXL2 was a significant prognostic factor in ER-positive patients treated with tamoxifen (HR=0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.04-0.81, P=0.03). Tumours expressing nuclear FOXL2 were also more likely positive for stromal and/or cytoplasmic aromatase (P=0.03 and P=0.008, respectively). In silico analyses revealed binding elements of FOXL2 in promoters 1.3, 11 and 17 of the aromatase gene of which promoter 1.7 was most significant. In conclusion, this is the first study to report that FOXL2 is expressed in breast cancer and correlates with aromatase as well as with clinical outcome. The results further strengthen a possible binding of FOXL2 to aromatase promoter 1.7. Nevertheless, whether FOXL2 is a direct activator of aromatase requires further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:1145 / 1151
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The distribution pattern of ERα expression, ESR1 genetic variation and expression of growth factor receptors: association with breast cancer prognosis in Russian patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen
    Nataliya Babyshkina
    Sergey Vtorushin
    Marina Zavyalova
    Stanislav Patalyak
    Tatyana Dronova
    Nikolay Litviakov
    Elena Slonimskaya
    Julia Kzhyshkowska
    Nadejda Cherdyntseva
    Evgeny Choynzonov
    Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2017, 17 : 383 - 393
  • [42] High expression of TRAF4 predicts poor prognosis in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer and promotes tamoxifen resistance
    Zhou, Jun
    Li, Wenhui
    Ming, Jie
    Yang, Wen
    Lu, Linlin
    Zhang, Qiulei
    Ruan, Shengnan
    Huang, Tao
    ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 2020, 31 (06) : 558 - 566
  • [43] The distribution pattern of ERα expression, ESR1 genetic variation and expression of growth factor receptors: association with breast cancer prognosis in Russian patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen
    Babyshkina, Nataliya
    Vtorushin, Sergey
    Zavyalova, Marina
    Patalyak, Stanislav
    Dronova, Tatyana
    Litviakov, Nikolay
    Slonimskaya, Elena
    Kzhyshkowska, Julia
    Cherdyntseva, Nadejda
    Choynzonov, Evgeny
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 17 (03) : 383 - 393
  • [44] GRB14 IS AN INDEPENDENT GOOD PROGNOSIS FACTOR FOR BREAST CANCER PATIENTS
    Huang, O.
    Min, J.
    Zhang, X.
    Shen, K.
    BREAST, 2013, 22 : S50 - S50
  • [45] JAM-A expression positively correlates with poor prognosis in breast cancer patients
    McSherry, Elaine A.
    McGee, Sharon F.
    Jirstrom, Karin
    Doyle, Emma M.
    Brennan, Donal J.
    Landberg, Goran
    Dervan, Peter A.
    Hopkins, Ann M.
    Gallagher, William M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 125 (06) : 1343 - 1351
  • [46] Comparison of gene expression profiles predicting progression in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen
    Marleen Kok
    Sabine C. Linn
    Ryan K. Van Laar
    Maurice P. H. M. Jansen
    Teun M. van den Berg
    Leonie J. M. J. Delahaye
    Annuska M. Glas
    Johannes L. Peterse
    Michael Hauptmann
    John A. Foekens
    Jan G. M. Klijn
    Lodewyk F. A. Wessels
    Laura J. Van’t Veer
    Els M. J. J. Berns
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2009, 113 : 275 - 283
  • [47] Comparison of gene expression profiles predicting progression in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen
    Kok, Marleen
    Linn, Sabine C.
    Van Laar, Ryan K.
    Jansen, Maurice P. H. M.
    van den Berg, Teun M.
    Delahaye, Leonie J. M. J.
    Glas, Annuska M.
    Peterse, Johannes L.
    Hauptmann, Michael
    Foekens, John A.
    Klijn, Jan G. M.
    Wessels, Lodewyk F. A.
    Van't Veer, Laura J.
    Berns, Els M. J. J.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 113 (02) : 275 - 283
  • [48] High progesterone receptor expression correlates to the effect of adjuvant tamoxifen in premenopausal breast cancer patients
    Stendahl, Maria
    Ryden, Lisa
    Nordenskjold, Bo
    Jonsson, Per Ebbe
    Landberg, Goran
    Jirstrom, Karin
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 12 (15) : 4614 - 4618
  • [49] High expression of FOXR2 in breast cancer correlates with poor prognosis
    Song, Haiping
    He, Wenshan
    Huang, Xiaoqing
    Zhang, Huiqiong
    Huang, Tao
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2016, 37 (05) : 5991 - 5997
  • [50] Cyclo-oxygenase 2 expression correlates with poor prognosis in breast cancer
    Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2007, 4 (6): : 332 - 332