Rigorous simulation and techno-economic analysis of a bio-jet-fuel intermediate production process with various integration strategies

被引:12
|
作者
Yu, Bor-Yih [1 ,2 ]
Tsai, Chang-Che [3 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Chem & Mat Engn, 259 Wenhua 1st Rd, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, 5 Fuxing St, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Chem Engn, 1,Sec 4,Roosevelt Rd, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
来源
关键词
Bio-jet fuel; Aldol condensation; Multi-effect evaporation; Furfural; PR plus COSMOSAC; Techno-economic analysis; MULTI EFFECT EVAPORATION; ORGANIC RANKINE-CYCLE; FURFURAL PRODUCTION; ALDOL-CONDENSATION; DISTILLATION PROCESS; TERNARY AZEOTROPE; VAPOR-PRESSURE; RANGE ALKANES; DESIGN; SEPARATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cherd.2070.03.012
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In this paper, we firstly report on the different scenarios of the process integration to produce jet-fuel intermediates from biomass. Rigorous process simulation, optimization, techno-economical evaluation, and carbon emission calculation are performed. We start from the aldol condensation process converting furfural and acetone to the jet-fuel intermediate. COSMO-SAC model and the PR+COSMOSAC equation of state (EOS) are firstly incorporated to estimate the missing physical properties of both pure component and the mixture. In this part, three process schemes (the distillation-only process, the multi-effect evaporation (MEE) assisted process, and the solvent-less process) are investigated, and the total annual cost (TAC) are compared. Comparing with the distillation-only process, the optimization results indicate a more favorable condition in the solvent-less process (89.76% TAC reduction) than the MEE-assisted process (25.54% TAC reduction). Moreover, different strategies of integrating the aldol condensation process with the front-end furfural production process are discussed. They are presented in five scenarios. YUMC (yearly unit manufacture cost) and ER (emission ratio) are calculated to quantify the economic performance and CO2 emission. Through this work, we suggest that the Scenario 4 (YUMC = 0.716 USD/kg, ER = -1.65) would be the most suitable one for CO2 reduction in the future, and the Scenario 2 (YUMC = 0.698 USD/kg, ER = 0.28) could be the nearest solution to enhance the economic performance and reducing CO2 emission based on the current technology. (C) 2020 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 65
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Techno-economic analysis of various process schemes for the production of fuel grade 2,3-butanediol from fermentation broth
    Haider, Junaid
    Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul
    Hussain, Arif
    Yasin, Muhammad
    Lee, Moonyong
    BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2018, 140 : 93 - 107
  • [32] A techno-economic review of hydroprocessed renewable esters and fatty acids for jet fuel production
    Pearlson, Matthew
    Wollersheim, Christoph
    Hileman, James
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2013, 7 (01): : 89 - 96
  • [33] Process Integration for the Production of Bioplastic Monomer: Techno-Economic Analysis and Life-Cycle Assessment
    Yang, Yong
    Seo, Kyeongjun
    Kwon, Joseph Sang-Il
    Won, Wangyun
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (30): : 11167 - 11180
  • [34] Techno-Economic Analysis of a Hybrid Process for Propylene and Ammonia Production
    Qin, Jian
    Pei, Chunlei
    Zhao, Chengjie
    Lu, Zhenpu
    Sun, Guodong
    Gong, Jinlong
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (21) : 6999 - 7009
  • [35] Techno-economic analysis of biomass to fuel conversion via the MixAlco process
    Pham, Viet
    Holtzapple, Mark
    El-Halwagi, Mahmoud
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 37 (11) : 1157 - 1168
  • [36] Techno-Economic Analysis of Solar Thermochemical Fuel Production: Sensitivity and Uncertainty
    Falter, Christoph
    Sizmann, Andreas
    SOLARPACES 2020 - 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER AND CHEMICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2022, 2445
  • [37] Techno-economic assessment of jet fuel production using the Fischer-Tropsch process from steel mill gas
    Collis, Jason
    Duch, Karsten
    Schomaecker, Reinhard
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 10
  • [38] Catalytic conversion of paper sludge carbohydrates to jet fuel range hydrocarbons: Process optimization and techno-economic analysis
    Cruz, David
    Park, Hyeonji
    Tiller, Phoenix
    Kumar, Adarsh
    Gonzalez, Ronalds
    Mittal, Ashutosh
    Johnson, David K.
    Park, Sunkyu
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2025, 507
  • [39] Techno-economic analysis of renewable jet fuel production: The comparison between Fischer-Tropsch synthesis and pyrolysis
    Wang, Wei-Cheng
    Liu, Yu-Cheng
    Nugroho, Rusdan Aditya Aji
    ENERGY, 2022, 239
  • [40] Techno-economic analysis and process simulation of alkoxylated surfactant production in a circular carbon economy framework
    Fisher, Oliver J.
    Sadhukhan, Jhuma
    Daniel, Thorin
    Xuan, Jin
    DIGITAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 13