Promoting cancer screening among the first-degree relatives of breast and colorectal cancer patients: The design of two randomized trials

被引:15
|
作者
Marcus, AC
Ahnen, D
Cutter, G
Calonge, N
Russell, S
Sedlacek, SM
Wood, M
Manchester, D
Fox, L
McCaskill-Stevens, W
Fairclough, D
Hines, S
Wenzel, L
Osborn, K
机构
[1] AMC Canc Res Ctr, Denver, CO 80214 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Ctr Canc, Denver, CO 80220 USA
[3] Dept Vet Affairs, Denver, CO 80220 USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente, Denver, CO 80231 USA
[5] Univ Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
[6] Childrens Hosp, Denver, CO 80218 USA
[7] Eleanor Roosevelt Inst Canc Res, Denver, CO 80206 USA
[8] Indiana Univ, Med Ctr, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[9] Univ Colorado, Ctr Canc, Denver, CO 80262 USA
关键词
cancer prevention and control; cancer screening; health education;
D O I
10.1006/pmed.1998.0408
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. In this paper two large nationwide trials are described, both of which will test a comparable telephone-based counseling intervention to promote cancer screening among the first-degree relatives (FDRs) of breast and colorectal cancer patients. The unit of randomization will be the family unit of eligible FDRs, Access to FDRs will be obtained from their relatives with cancer. Selected intervention and design issues are reviewed, including how both projects will respond to FDRs who exhibit significant levels of cancer-specific anxiety or distress and how potential highrisk cancer families will be accommodated. Methods. Pursuant to the development of both studies, two feasibility surveys were conducted to determine whether patients would grant access to their FDRs and whether the FDRS identified by these patients would be receptive to the telephone intervention. Results. Approximately 80% (106 of 132) of breast cancer patients agreed to provide access to their eligible FDRs when contacted on-site at participating hospitals and clinics, Of those subsequently selected for telephone follow-up (n = 95 or 90%), 80% (n = 76) were successfully contacted by telephone, and of these 97% (n = 74) provided the names and telephone numbers of their FDRs, Among colorectal cancer patients contacted on-site (n = 46), 96% (n = 44) agreed to provide access to their FDRs, and of those contacted by telephone (n = 33 or 75%), 91% (n = 30) provided the requested information about their FDRs. Once contacted, 95% of breast cancer FDRs (55 of 58) and 91% of colorectal cancer patients (51 of 56) endorsed the intervention strategy. Conclusions. It is argued that this intervention, if proven effective, could provide an exportable strategy for reaching large numbers of high-risk individuals to promote cancer screening. (C)1999 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 242
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Psychological distance: a qualitative study of screening barriers among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients
    Xueying Zhang
    Yiheng Zhang
    Jingyu Chen
    Meifen Zhang
    Ni Gong
    BMC Public Health, 21
  • [22] Psychological distance: a qualitative study of screening barriers among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients
    Zhang, Xueying
    Zhang, Yiheng
    Chen, Jingyu
    Zhang, Meifen
    Gong, Ni
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [23] Promoting cancer screening among first degree relatives of colon cancer patients.
    Ahnen, DJ
    Hines, S
    Vanoni, C
    Colange, N
    Flynn, P
    Bresalier, R
    Triadafilopoulos, G
    Sontag, S
    Berkel, H
    Collins, JF
    Nelson, D
    Bini, E
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 118 (04) : A442 - A442
  • [24] Colorectal cancer screening beliefs -: Focus groups with first-degree Relatives
    Rawl, SM
    Menon, U
    Champion, VL
    Foster, JL
    Skinner, CS
    CANCER PRACTICE, 2000, 8 (01) : 32 - 37
  • [25] Benign breast disease among first-degree relatives of young breast cancer patients
    Bertelsen, Lisbeth
    Mellemkjaer, Lene
    Balslev, Eva
    Olsen, Jorgen H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 168 (03) : 261 - 267
  • [26] Randomized trial to increase colorectal cancer screening in an ethnically diverse sample of first-degree relatives
    Bastani, Roshan
    Glenn, Beth A.
    Maxwell, Annette E.
    Ganz, Patricia A.
    Mojica, Cynthia M.
    Alber, Susan
    Crespi, Catherine M.
    Chang, L. Cindy
    CANCER, 2015, 121 (17) : 2951 - 2959
  • [27] Effect of Remote Counseling on Screening Uptake in the First-Degree Relatives of Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Dong, Bei
    Chen, Yongfeng
    Zhang, Dongting
    Choi, Kai Chow
    Chan, Carmen W. H.
    CANCER NURSING, 2025,
  • [28] Screening in First-Degree Relatives of Young Patients With Colorectal Cancer: What is the Best Approach?
    Belga, Sara
    Lage, Pedro A.
    Rodrigues, Paula
    Claro, Isabel
    Ferreira, Sara
    Mao-de-Ferro, Susana
    Parreira, Joana
    Mendes, Celia
    Chaves, Paula
    Fidalgo, Paulo
    Pereira, Antonio Dias
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 140 (05) : S417 - S417
  • [29] Results of screening first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer: A community practice perspective
    Beaudin, DJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 14 (06): : 489 - 492
  • [30] Are Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendations for First-Degree Relatives of Patients With Adenomas Too Aggressive?
    Austin, Gregory L.
    Goldstein, Jonathan I.
    Peters, Stevany L.
    Ahnen, Dennis J.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 9 (04) : 308 - 313