A Multi-Laboratory Comparison of Methods for Detection and Quantification of African Swine Fever Virus

被引:4
|
作者
Olesen, Ann Sofie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rasmussen, Thomas Bruun [1 ,3 ]
Nielsen, Soren Saxmose [4 ]
Belsham, Graham J. [1 ,2 ]
Boklund, Anette [4 ]
Ploegaert, Tosca [5 ]
Moonen-Leusen, Bernie [5 ]
Blome, Sandra [6 ]
Botner, Anette [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, DTU Natl Vet Inst, DK-4771 Lindholm, Kalvehave, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Sect Vet Clin Microbiol, Dept Vet & Anim Sci, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[3] Statens Serum Inst, Dept Virus & Microbiol Special Diagnost, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Vet & Anim Sci, Sect Anim Welf & Dis Control, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[5] Wageningen Univ & Res, Dept Virol Wageningen Biovet Res, NL-8221 RA Lelystad, Netherlands
[6] Friedrich Loeffler Inst, Inst Diagnost Virol, D-17493 Greifswald, Germany
来源
PATHOGENS | 2022年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
African swine fever; qPCR; quantification; ring trial; virus infectivity; virus titration; WILD BOAR; CELL-LINE; PCR ASSAY; INFECTION; EXPRESSION; GENERATION; DIAGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; ISOLATE; FIELD;
D O I
10.3390/pathogens11030325
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
African swine fever is a viral disease of the family Suidae. Methods to detect and quantify African swine fever virus (ASFV) include qPCR and virus infectivity assays. Individual laboratories often use in-house procedures for these assays, which can hamper the comparison of results. The objective of this study was to estimate the probability of ASFV detection using these assays, and to determine the inter-test correlations between results. This was achieved by testing a panel of 80 samples at three reference laboratories. Samples were analysed using nucleic acid extraction and qPCR, as well as virus infectivity assays. For qPCR, a very high probability (ranging from 0.96 to 1.0) of detecting ASFV DNA was observed for all tested systems. For virus infectivity assays in cells, the probability of detecting infectious ASFV varied from 0.68 to 0.90 and was highest using pulmonary alveolar macrophages, followed by MARC145 cells, peripheral blood monocytes, and finally wild boar lung cells. Intraclass correlation coefficient estimates of 0.97 (0.96-0.98) between qPCR methods, 0.80 (0.74-0.85) to 0.94 (0.92-0.96) between virus infectivity assays, and 0.77 (0.68-0.83) to 0.95 (0.93-0.96) between qPCR methods and virus infectivity assays were obtained. These findings show that qPCR gives the highest probability for the detection of ASFV.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] AFRICAN SWINE FEVER VIRUS
    WARDLEY, RC
    ANDRADE, CD
    BLACK, DN
    PORTUGAL, FLD
    ENJUANES, L
    HESS, WR
    MEBUS, C
    ORDAS, A
    RUTILI, D
    VIZCAINO, JS
    VIGARIO, JD
    WILKINSON, PJ
    NUNES, JFM
    THOMSON, G
    ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 1983, 76 (02) : 73 - 90
  • [12] AFRICAN SWINE FEVER VIRUS
    VINUELA, E
    CURRENT TOPICS IN MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 1985, 116 : 151 - 170
  • [13] Recommendations following a multi-laboratory comparison of microbial source tracking methods
    Stewart, Jill R.
    Boehm, Alexandria B.
    Dubinsky, Eric A.
    Fong, Theng-Theng
    Goodwin, Kelly D.
    Griffith, John F.
    Noble, Rachel T.
    Shanks, Orin C.
    Vijayavel, Kannappan
    Weisberg, Stephen B.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2013, 47 (18) : 6829 - 6838
  • [14] Detection of African swine fever virus in pigs in Southwest Nigeria
    Awosanya, Emmanuel Jolaoluwa
    Olugasa, Babasola Oluseyi
    Gimba, Fufa Ido
    Sabri, Mohd Yusoff
    Ogundipe, Gabriel Adetunji
    VETERINARY WORLD, 2021, 14 (07) : 1840 - 1845
  • [15] Swift and Reliable "Easy Lab" Methods for the Sensitive Molecular Detection of African Swine Fever Virus
    Elnagar, Ahmed
    Pikalo, Jutta
    Beer, Martin
    Blome, Sandra
    Hoffmann, Bernd
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2021, 22 (05) : 1 - 14
  • [16] Effect of husbandry methods on seropositivity to African swine fever virus in Sardinian swine herds
    Mannelli, A
    Sotgia, S
    Patta, C
    Sarria, A
    Madrau, P
    Sanna, L
    Firinu, A
    Laddomada, A
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1997, 32 (3-4) : 235 - 241
  • [17] Laboratory-scale inactivation of African swine fever virus and swine vesicular disease virus in pig slurry
    Turner, C
    Williams, SM
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 87 (01) : 148 - 157
  • [18] AFRICAN SWINE FEVER VIRUS GLYCOPROTEINS
    SEREDA, AD
    ANOKHINA, YG
    MAKAROV, VV
    VOPROSY VIRUSOLOGII, 1994, 39 (06) : 278 - 281
  • [19] Epidemiology of African swine fever virus
    Costard, S.
    Mur, L.
    Lubroth, J.
    Sanchez-Vizcaino, J. M.
    Pfeiffer, D. U.
    VIRUS RESEARCH, 2013, 173 (01) : 191 - 197
  • [20] AIDS AND AFRICAN SWINE FEVER VIRUS
    FEORINO, P
    SCHABLE, G
    SCHOCHETMAN, G
    JAFFE, H
    CURRAN, J
    WITTE, J
    HESS, W
    LANCET, 1986, 2 (8510): : 815 - 815