Functional status predicts major complications and death after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

被引:37
|
作者
Harris, Donald G. [1 ]
Bulatao, Ilynn [1 ]
Oates, Connor P. [1 ]
Kalsi, Richa [1 ]
Drucker, Charles B. [1 ]
Menon, Nandakumar [1 ]
Flohr, Tanya R. [1 ]
Crawford, Robert S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Vasc Surg, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Med Ctr, Ctr Aort Dis, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MEDICARE POPULATION; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; OLDER PATIENTS; FRAILTY; MORTALITY; SURGERY; MORBIDITY; NSQIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.028
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is considered a lower risk option for treating abdominal aortic aneurysms and is of particular utility in patients with poor functional status who may be poor candidates for open repair. However, the specific contribution of preoperative functional status to EVAR outcomes remains poorly defined. We hypothesized that impaired functional status, based simply on the ability of patients to perform activities of daily living, is associated with worse outcomes after EVAR. Methods: Patients undergoing nonemergent EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm between 2010 and 2014 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and major operative and systemic complications. Secondary outcomes were inpatient length of stay, need for reoperation, and discharge disposition. Using the NSQIP-defined preoperative functional status, patients were stratified as independent or dependent (either partial or totally dependent) and compared by univariate and multivariable analyses. Results: Of 13,432 patients undergoing EVAR between 2010 and 2014, 13,043 were independent (97%) and 389 were dependent (3%) before surgery. Dependent patients were older and more frequently minorities; had higher rates of chronic pulmonary, heart, and kidney disease; and were more likely to have an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 4 or 5. On multivariable analysis, preoperative dependent status was an independent risk factor for operative complications (odds ratio [OR], 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-3.9), systemic complications (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 2.0-3.9), and 30-day mortality (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.1-5.6). Secondary outcomes were worse among dependent patients. Conclusions: Although EVAR is a minimally invasive procedure with substantially less physiologic stress than in open aortic repair, preoperative functional status is a critical determinant of adverse outcomes after EVAR in spite of the minimally invasive nature of the procedure. Functional status, as measured by performance of activities of daily living, can be used as a valuable marker of increased perioperative risk and may identify patients who may benefit from preoperative conditioning and specialized perioperative care. (J Vasc Surg 2017;66:743-50.)
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 750
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Loss of Independence, Complications, and Death After Discharge After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Ilonzo, Nicole
    De Jesus, Christopher
    Harrington, Andrew
    Lantis, John C.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 65 (06) : 154S - 155S
  • [22] Ultrasound Imaging of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Diagnosis of Aneurysms and Complications and Follow-Up after Endovascular Repair
    Schuster, H.
    Duenser, E.
    Osinger, K.
    Bergmayr, W.
    Fischer-Scholz, U.
    Richter, W.
    Mostbeck, G. H.
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2009, 30 (06): : 528 - 543
  • [23] Perioperative complications and early outcome after endovascular and open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Elkouri, S
    Gloviczki, P
    McKusick, MA
    Panneton, JM
    Andrews, J
    Bower, TC
    Noel, AA
    Harmsen, WS
    Hoskin, TL
    Cherry, K
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 39 (03) : 497 - 505
  • [24] Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in women after FDA approval: Results, complications, and limitations
    Sanchez, LA
    Rubin, BG
    Keller, CA
    Choi, ET
    Geraghty, PJ
    Vedantham, S
    Hovsepian, D
    Picus, D
    Sicard, GA
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 16 (04) : 430 - 435
  • [25] Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Current status and future directions
    Kaufman, JA
    Geller, SC
    Brewster, DC
    Fan, CM
    Cambria, RP
    LaMuraglia, GM
    Gertler, JP
    Abbott, WM
    Waltman, AC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 175 (02) : 289 - 302
  • [26] Risk Factors for Major Cardiac Complications After Endovascular Repair of Aortic Aneurysms: A Nationwide Survey
    Gonzalez-Guardiola, Gerardo
    Phoenix Vuong
    Lee, Andy
    Dayal, Rajeev
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 65 (06) : 152S - 154S
  • [27] Current status of management of type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Rhee, SJ
    Ohki, T
    Veith, FJ
    Kurvers, H
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 17 (03) : 335 - 344
  • [28] Continued expansion of aortic necks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Matsumura, JS
    Chaikof, EL
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 28 (03) : 422 - 430
  • [29] Endovascular repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Albertini, JN
    Macierewicz, J
    Yusuf, W
    Walker, S
    Hopkinson, B
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 6 (02): : 183 - 183
  • [30] Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms - In reply
    Elkouri, S
    Gloviczki, P
    McKusick, MA
    Panneton, JM
    Andrews, JC
    Bower, TC
    Noel, AA
    Sullivan, TM
    Canton, L
    Harmsen, WS
    Hoskin, TL
    Cherry, KJ
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 79 (04) : 570 - 571