Codigested dairy slurry as a phosphorus and nitrogen source for Zea mays L. and Amaranthus cruentus L.

被引:58
|
作者
Bachmann, Silvia [1 ]
Wentzel, Stefanie [1 ]
Eichler-Loebermann, Bettina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rostock, Dept Crop Husb, Fac Agr & Environm Sci, D-18051 Rostock, Germany
关键词
amaranth; biogas residues; maize; microbial activity; SOIL-PHOSPHORUS; SHORT-TERM; PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES; BIOGAS PLANTS; ANIMAL SLURRY; SWINE MANURE; DIGESTION; CROP; AVAILABILITY; YIELD;
D O I
10.1002/jpln.201000383
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Residues from biogas production contain essential plant nutrients such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) but also organic matter, and should be recycled in crop production. For efficient re-use as fertilizers, the availability of nutrients for crops and the effect of the residues on soil fertility need to be evaluated. Focusing on the element P, we compared effects of codigested slurry with dairy slurry, highly soluble mineral NPK fertilizer, and a control without any P supply (NK). Codigested slurry used in this experiment was based on anaerobic digestion of dairy slurry, maize silage, and wheat grain. The fertilizing effects were tested in an 8-week pot experiment on a sandy and a loamy soil using two crop species (Zea mays L., Amaranthus cruentus L.). The plant P uptake was up to 64% greater in the slurry treatments than in the treatment without P. The effect of codigested slurry on P uptake was comparable to that of dairy slurry and mineral P. Plant N uptake from codigested slurry was lower than that from mineral N (NK, NPK), but tended to be higher than from dairy slurry. The water-soluble and double lactatesoluble P content of the soil was lower in the slurry treatments than in the mineral-P treatments and accompanied by higher contents of microbial-bound P. Differences between both organic fertilizers were detected for dehydrogenase activity which was up to 32% lower in soils fertilized with codigested slurry than it was in soils fertilized with dairy slurry. Our results indicate that codigestion of slurries in biogas plants does not substantially alter their fertilizer value as P and N sources for crops.
引用
收藏
页码:908 / 915
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] INTEGRATED EFFECTS OF NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS AND CO-DIGESTED BIOSLURRY ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF ZEA MAYS L.
    Sarkar, S. K.
    Uddin, M. K.
    BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2017, 46 (04): : 1397 - 1406
  • [42] Effect of Elevated [CO2] on Assimilation, Allocation of Nitrogen and Phosphorus by Maize (Zea Mays L.)
    Xie, Xiaojin
    Li, Renying
    Zhang, Yaohong
    Shen, Shuanghe
    Bao, Yunxuan
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2018, 49 (09) : 1032 - 1044
  • [43] Effect of Soil Moisture Stress on the Emergence, Establishment and Productivity of Amaranthus (Amaranthus cruentus L.)
    Ojo, O. D.
    Olufolaji, A. O.
    I ALL AFRICA HORTICULTURAL CONGRESS, 2011, 911 : 113 - 121
  • [44] Safeners for chlorsulfuron on maize (Zea mays L.)
    Stoilkova, Gergana
    Yonova, Petranka
    QUALITY ASSURANCE AND SAFETY OF CROPS & FOODS, 2010, 2 (01) : 28 - 35
  • [45] Dwarf mutants of maize (Zea mays L.)
    Cheng, VC
    Cheng, WY
    Cheng, PC
    Walden, DB
    SCANNING, 2005, 27 (02) : 81 - 82
  • [46] Corn (Zea mays L.) response to trifloxysulfuron
    Porterfield, D
    Wilcut, JW
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 20 (01) : 81 - 85
  • [47] Stochastic population model of Zea mays L.
    Barriga Rubio, R. H.
    Solari, H. G.
    Otero, M.
    MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 2019, 312 : 88 - 96
  • [48] THE MAIZE (Zea mays L.) AND THE MAYAN CULTURE
    Lopez Mazon, Sylvia Lorenia
    Garcia Navarrete, Gilberto
    Ibarra Gutierrez, Brenda Natalia
    BIOTECNIA, 2012, 14 (03): : 3 - 8
  • [49] Salinity Tolerance of Sea-beach Amaranth (Amaranthus pumilus Raf.) in Comparison with the Grain Amaranths Amaranthus cruentus L. and Amaranthus hypochondriacus L.
    Eisenman, S. W.
    Zeitzer, I.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2012, 47 (09) : S3 - S3
  • [50] Developmental anatomy of the shoot of Zea mays L.
    Sharman, BC
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1942, 6 (22) : 245 - 282