Investigation of Factors Influencing the Prognosis in Prostate Cancer Patients with Isolated Bone Metastasis

被引:0
|
作者
Ebinc, Senar [1 ]
Oruc, Zeynep [1 ]
Urakci, Zuhat [1 ]
Kaplan, Muhammet Ali [1 ]
Kucukoner, Mehmet [1 ]
Isikdogan, Abdurrahman [1 ]
机构
[1] Dicle Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, Diyarbakir, Turkey
来源
关键词
prostate prostate Bone metastasis; prostate cancer; prognostic factors; SURVIVAL; ANEMIA; MODEL; PROGRESSION; OUTCOMES; THERAPY; VOLUME; MEN;
D O I
10.4274/uob.galenos.2022.2022.1.4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Bone metastases, which show a milder course compared with visceral disease, are among the most common metastatic sites in prostate cancer. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic factors that influence the survival time in the castration-sensitive phase in patients diagnosed with prostate adenocarcinoma with isolated bone metastasis.Materials and Methods: The prognostic effects of the clinical (performance status, number of bone metastases) and laboratory parameters of a total of 217 patients, of whom the data could be accessed, on survival in the castration-sensitive phase were evaluated.Results: Of the 217 patients included in our study, 144 (66.4%) were metastatic at presentation. The mean age of the patients was 68.4 (42-88) years. The mean follow-up duration was 44 months. Of our 217 patients, 125 (57.6%) were included in the castration-sensitive group and 92 (42.4%) in the castration-resistant group. In multivariate analyses; lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels and the number of bone metastases were independent prognostic factors with a strong correlation with time to castration-resistant prostate cancer. The evaluation of these three parameters within the framework of a prognostic index and subsequent risk stratification revealed median progression-free survival times of 91, 36, 20 and 12 months for the very low-risk, low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk groups, respectively.Conclusion: Lactate dehydrogenase, ALP levels and the number of bone metastases were determined as strong and useful prognostic factors in predicting time to in
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 104
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CANCER OF NASOPHARYNX - FACTORS INFLUENCING PROGNOSIS
    PEREZ, CA
    ACKERMAN, LV
    MILL, WB
    OGURA, JH
    POWERS, WE
    CANCER, 1969, 24 (01) : 1 - &
  • [32] Bone metastasis in endometrial cancer: evaluation of treatment approaches by factors affecting prognosis
    Doger, E.
    Cakiroglu, Y.
    Ozdamar, O.
    Ceylan, Y.
    Kole, E.
    Yucesoy, I.
    Caliskan, E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 37 (03) : 407 - 416
  • [33] Osteoblasts in prostate cancer metastasis to bone
    Christopher J. Logothetis
    Sue-Hwa Lin
    Nature Reviews Cancer, 2005, 5 : 21 - 28
  • [34] Osteonectin and prostate cancer metastasis to bone
    Jacob, K
    Kleinman, H
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 1999, 10 : 146A - 146A
  • [35] Management of bone metastasis in prostate cancer
    Kazuo Nishimura
    Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, 2023, 41 : 317 - 326
  • [36] Osteoblasts in prostate cancer metastasis to bone
    Logothetis, CJ
    Lin, SH
    NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2005, 5 (01) : 21 - 28
  • [37] Osteoprotegerin in prostate cancer bone metastasis
    Corey, E
    Brown, LG
    Kiefer, JA
    Quinn, JE
    Pitts, TEM
    Blair, JM
    Vessella, RL
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 65 (05) : 1710 - 1718
  • [38] Management of bone metastasis in prostate cancer
    Nishimura, Kazuo
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM, 2023, 41 (03) : 317 - 326
  • [39] The Bone Microenvironment in Prostate Cancer Metastasis
    DiNatale, Anthony
    Fatatis, Alessandro
    PROSTATE CANCER: CELLULAR AND GENETIC MECHANISMS OF DISEASE DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION, 2ND EDITION, 2019, 1210 : 171 - 184
  • [40] FACTORS INFLUENCING PROGNOSIS IN RADIOTHERAPEUTIC MANAGEMENT OF CARCINOMA OF PROSTATE
    LIPSETT, JA
    COSGROVE, MD
    GREEN, N
    CASAGRANDE, JT
    MELBYE, RW
    GEORGE, FW
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1976, 1 (11-1): : 1049 - 1058