The impact of age on pathological insignificant prostate cancer rates in contemporary robot-assisted prostatectomy patients despite active surveillance eligibility

被引:7
|
作者
Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi [1 ]
Wagner, Christian [1 ]
Schuette, Andreas [1 ]
Addali, Mustapha [1 ]
Liakos, Nikolaos [1 ]
Urbanova, Katarina [1 ]
Mendrek, Mikolaj [1 ]
Oelke, Matthias [1 ]
Witt, Jorn H. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Urol Pediat Urol & Urooncol, Gronau, Germany
来源
MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY | 2022年 / 74卷 / 04期
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; Neoplasm grading; Neoplasm staging; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; MEN; GUIDELINES; OUTCOMES; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04174-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess insignificant prostate cancer (iPCa) rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in contemporary patients who were preoperatively eligible for active surveillance (AS). iPCa indicates no risk of PCa progression. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 2837 RARP patients (2010-2019) who fulfilled at least one AS entry criteria set: Prostate Cancer Research International - Active Surveillance (PRIAS), University of California San Francisco (UCSF) (San Francisco, CA, USA), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) or University of Toronto, ON, Canada. We utilized four different iPCa definitions: 1) based on pT2 and Gleason Score <= 6 and also cumulative tumorvolume; 2) <= 2.5mL; 3) <= 0.7mL; or 4) <= 0.5mL. For each AS set we tested the rates of iPCa and compared between age <70 vs. >= 70 years. This was complemented by multivariable logistic regression (LRM) predicting iPCa, adjusted for age and clinical AS variables. Finally, within the subgroup who had iPCa, we tested the rate of those who were deemed preoperatively AS ineligible. RESULTS: Between most (PRIAS) and least stringent (TORONTO) AS sets, iPCa was correctly predicted in 70-57%. Similarly, for iPCa definitions 2-4, rates were 59-42%, 34-19% and 27-14%. Senior patients harbored decreased proportions of iPCa. LRM confirmed that advanced age is associated with a lower chance of iPCa. More stringent AS sets lead to higher rates of AS ineligibility, e.g. 53% for PRIAS, despite iPCa. CONCLUSIONS: AS sets show limited accuracy for stricter iPCa definitions, which further declined with advanced age. Greater AS stringency resulted in more AS ineligible patients despite harboring iPCa. In consequence, patients are at risk for overtreatment. Clinicians must consider age and different AS sets that result in highly variable detection rates of iPCa.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 444
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CONTEMPORARY PATIENTS WITH BIOPSY GLEASON 3+4 PROSTATE CANCER: ELIGIBILITY FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Kwon, Ohseong
    Lee, Hakmin
    Jo, Jung Ki
    Lee, Young Ik
    Oh, Jong Jin
    Lee, Sangchul
    Jeong, Seong Jin
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Lee, Sang Eun
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E515 - E515
  • [22] Predicting pathological outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a preoperative nomogram
    Abdollah, Firas
    Klett, Dane E.
    Sood, Akshay
    Sammon, Jesse D.
    Pucheril, Daniel
    Dalela, Deepansh
    Diaz, Mireya
    Peabody, James O.
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Menon, Mani
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 (05) : 703 - 712
  • [23] The clinical impact of robot-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery associated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Maeda, Anri
    Takahashi, Hiroki
    Watanabe, Kaori
    Yanagita, Takeshi
    Suzuki, Takuya
    Nakai, Nozomu
    Maeda, Yuzo
    Shiga, Kazuyoshi
    Hirokawa, Takahisa
    Ogawa, Ryo
    Hara, Masayasu
    Matsuo, Yoichi
    Takiguchi, Shuji
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2022, 15 (01) : 36 - 43
  • [24] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high risk prostate cancer: an analysis of positive surgical margin rates
    Huang, S.
    Ma, X.
    Zhang, X.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 : 39 - 39
  • [25] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high risk prostate cancer: An analysis of positive surgical margin rates
    Shuang, Huang
    Xu, Zhang
    Xin, Ma
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 25 : 447 - 447
  • [26] Role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in locally advanced prostate cancer
    Saika, Takashi
    Miura, Noriyoshi
    Fukumoto, Tetsuya
    Yanagihara, Yutaka
    Miyauchi, Yuki
    Kikugawa, Tadahiko
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 25 (01) : 30 - 35
  • [27] Is it safe to defer prostate cancer treatment? Assessing the impact of surgical delay on the risk of pathological upstaging after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Di Maida, Fabrizio
    Grosso, Antonio Andrea
    Lambertini, Luca
    Paganelli, Daniele
    Marzocco, Andrea
    Salamone, Vincenzo
    Bacchiani, Mara
    Oriti, Rino
    Vittori, Gianni
    Salvi, Matteo
    Tuccio, Agostino
    Mari, Andrea
    Minervini, Andrea
    EJSO, 2024, 50 (07):
  • [28] A contemporary analysis of disease upstaging of Gleason 3+3 prostate cancer patients after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Taggart, Ruairidh
    Dutto, Lorenzo
    Leung, Hing Y.
    Salji, Mark
    Ahmad, Imran
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (22): : 20830 - 20837
  • [29] Outcomes of prostate cancer patients after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy in Korea
    Jaehun Jung
    Gi Hwan Bae
    Jae Heon Kim
    Jaehong Kim
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [30] Outcomes of prostate cancer patients after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy in Korea
    Jung, Jaehun
    Bae, Gi Hwan
    Kim, Jae Heon
    Kim, Jaehong
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)