The impact of age on pathological insignificant prostate cancer rates in contemporary robot-assisted prostatectomy patients despite active surveillance eligibility

被引:7
|
作者
Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi [1 ]
Wagner, Christian [1 ]
Schuette, Andreas [1 ]
Addali, Mustapha [1 ]
Liakos, Nikolaos [1 ]
Urbanova, Katarina [1 ]
Mendrek, Mikolaj [1 ]
Oelke, Matthias [1 ]
Witt, Jorn H. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Urol Pediat Urol & Urooncol, Gronau, Germany
来源
MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY | 2022年 / 74卷 / 04期
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; Neoplasm grading; Neoplasm staging; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; MEN; GUIDELINES; OUTCOMES; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04174-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess insignificant prostate cancer (iPCa) rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in contemporary patients who were preoperatively eligible for active surveillance (AS). iPCa indicates no risk of PCa progression. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 2837 RARP patients (2010-2019) who fulfilled at least one AS entry criteria set: Prostate Cancer Research International - Active Surveillance (PRIAS), University of California San Francisco (UCSF) (San Francisco, CA, USA), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) or University of Toronto, ON, Canada. We utilized four different iPCa definitions: 1) based on pT2 and Gleason Score <= 6 and also cumulative tumorvolume; 2) <= 2.5mL; 3) <= 0.7mL; or 4) <= 0.5mL. For each AS set we tested the rates of iPCa and compared between age <70 vs. >= 70 years. This was complemented by multivariable logistic regression (LRM) predicting iPCa, adjusted for age and clinical AS variables. Finally, within the subgroup who had iPCa, we tested the rate of those who were deemed preoperatively AS ineligible. RESULTS: Between most (PRIAS) and least stringent (TORONTO) AS sets, iPCa was correctly predicted in 70-57%. Similarly, for iPCa definitions 2-4, rates were 59-42%, 34-19% and 27-14%. Senior patients harbored decreased proportions of iPCa. LRM confirmed that advanced age is associated with a lower chance of iPCa. More stringent AS sets lead to higher rates of AS ineligibility, e.g. 53% for PRIAS, despite iPCa. CONCLUSIONS: AS sets show limited accuracy for stricter iPCa definitions, which further declined with advanced age. Greater AS stringency resulted in more AS ineligible patients despite harboring iPCa. In consequence, patients are at risk for overtreatment. Clinicians must consider age and different AS sets that result in highly variable detection rates of iPCa.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 444
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comment on: "The impact of age on pathological insignificant prostate cancer rates in contemporary robot-assisted prostatectomy patients despite active surveillance eligibility"
    Maggi, Martina
    van den Bergh, Roderick
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 74 (04): : 485 - 487
  • [2] Contemporary Techniques of Prostate Dissection for Robot-assisted Prostatectomy
    Martini, Alberto
    Falagario, Ugo Giovanni
    Villers, Arnauld
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Mazzone, Elio
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Buscarini, Maurizio
    Bravi, Carlo Andrea
    Briganti, Alberto
    Sawczyn, Guilherme
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Menon, Mani
    Secco, Silvia
    Bocciardi, Aldo Massimo
    Wang, Gongxian
    Zhou, Xiaochen
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Patel, Vipul
    Tewari, Ashutosh K.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Gaston, Richard
    Wiklund, N. Peter
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 78 (04) : 583 - 591
  • [3] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Sun, Maxine
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2015, 11 (20) : 2767 - 2773
  • [4] Oncological outcomes of patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after previous failure of active surveillance for prostate cancer
    Labanaris, A. P.
    Wagner, C.
    Lange, P.
    Witt, J. H.
    Zugor, V.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (01) : E968 - U32
  • [5] Functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance
    Marc Zanaty
    Khaled Ajib
    Kevin Zorn
    Assaad El-Hakim
    World Journal of Urology, 2018, 36 : 1391 - 1397
  • [6] Functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance
    Zanaty, Marc
    Ajib, Khaled
    Zorn, Kevin
    El-Hakim, Assaad
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (09) : 1391 - 1397
  • [7] Impact of prostate size in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Boczko, Judd
    Erturk, Erdal
    Golijanin, Dragan
    Madeb, Ralph
    Patel, Hitendra
    Joseph, Jean V.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (02) : 184 - 188
  • [8] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer
    Bates, A.
    Abreu, L. de Castro
    Aron, M.
    Samavedi, S.
    Metcalfe, C.
    Desai, M.
    Wong, K.
    Gill, I. S.
    Patel, V.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 : 26 - 26
  • [9] Eligibility for active surveillance of prostate cancer and functional outcomes after prostatectomy
    Shepherd, A.
    O'Callaghan, M.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 : 33 - 33
  • [10] Correlation of Radiological and Pathological Staging in Early Prostate Cancer Treated with Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
    Kalra, B.
    Singh, A.
    Pathmanathan, A.
    Hazell, S.
    Cahill, D.
    Tree, A.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 36 (01) : E81 - E81