Five year Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite-based quality of life outcomes after prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer

被引:40
|
作者
Parker, Walter R. [1 ]
Wang, Rou [1 ]
He, Chang [1 ]
Wood, David P., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
EPIC; prostate cancer; sexual recovery; urinary recovery; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; URINARY; BOWEL; ADENOCARCINOMA; BRACHYTHERAPY; SURVIVORS; MEN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09579.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Previous studies typically assessed early outcomes (< 2 years) after prostatectomy often without individual pre-operative scores for comparison. Our study followed patients and provides long term results, five years post-operatively, and compared results to patients own baseline scores across all domains within EPIC. OBJECTIVE To document the Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite (EPIC) results for men followed for 5 years after radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS EPIC and demographic information were prospectively obtained from 434 patients who received questionnaires preoperatively and 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months postoperatively. Paired t-tests compared scores at individual time points. Percentage return to baseline was calculated at all postoperative time points and multivariate analyses evaluated postoperative trends. RESULTS The mean age of patients was 63.4 years. Mean urinary function and incontinence worsen after prostatectomy, with recovery stable 12 months after surgery. Mean urinary bother returned to baseline by 4 months post-prostatectomy. Some 55.8% and 77.5% of patients return to their urinary function and bother baselines, respectively, 1 year after surgery. Mean sexual function and bother both declined after surgery, with new stable baselines achieved by 24 and 36 months post-prostatectomy, respectively. Of the patients, 24.2% returned to their sexual function baseline by 24 months. No postoperative improvement was noted in mean sexual bother until the 12 months post-prostatectomy. Of the patients, 36.8% returned to their sexual bother baseline by 36 months. Minimal change was noted in the bowel and hormonal domains. CONCLUSIONS Mean urinary function and incontinence did not recover to preoperative baseline after prostatectomy, although it did not add distress because mean urinary bother returned to pre-prostatectomy levels. Mean sexual function declined post-prostatectomy, with continued recovery up to 24 months. Sexual bother recovered later but, once it reached a new baseline, the distress does not lessen with time, probably indicating an inability to adjust to their functional loss.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 590
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Five-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: Results from the prostate cancer outcomes study
    Penson, DF
    McLerron, D
    Feng, ZD
    Li, L
    Akerley, W
    Albertsen, PC
    Gilliland, F
    Hoffman, RM
    Stephenson, RA
    Alonzo, T
    Potosky, AL
    Stanford, JL
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 451 - 451
  • [42] Partial prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer
    Wu, Yue
    Wang, Chengwei
    Long, Xiangyu
    Wang, Tao
    Wang, Zhihua
    Yang, Chunguang
    Wang, Shaogang
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [43] “Expanded prostate cancer index composite” (EPIC-26): Results of functional treatment in patients with localized prostate cancer [„Expanded prostate cancer index composite“ (EPIC-26): Funktionelles Behandlungsergebnis bei Patienten mit lokalisiertem Prostatakarzinom]
    Beyer B.
    Huland H.
    Feick G.
    Graefen M.
    Der Urologe, 2015, 54 (11): : 1591 - 1595
  • [44] Prostate volume and pathologic prostate cancer outcomes after radical prostatectomy
    Pierorazio, Phillip M.
    Kinnaman, Michael D.
    Wosnitzer, Matthew S.
    Benson, Mitchell C.
    McKiernan, James M.
    Goluboff, Erik T.
    UROLOGY, 2007, 70 (04) : 696 - 701
  • [45] Radical prostatectomy and watchful waiting for localized prostate cancer did not differ for quality of life
    Prochazka, Allan V.
    Caverly, Tanner J.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 156 (08)
  • [46] Quality of life after treatment for localized prostate cancer: Differences based on treatment modality
    Davis, JW
    Kuban, DA
    Lynch, DF
    Schellhammer, PF
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (03): : 947 - 952
  • [47] Five-year quality of life assessment after carbon ion radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Maruyama, Katsuya
    Tsuji, Hiroshi
    Nomiya, Takuma
    Katoh, Hiroyuki
    Ishikawa, Hitoshi
    Kamada, Tadashi
    Wakatsuki, Masaru
    Akakura, Koichiro
    Shimazaki, Jun
    Aoyama, Hidefumi
    Tsujii, Hirohiko
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2017, 58 (02) : 260 - 266
  • [48] Quality of Life after Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer With a Hydrogel Spacer: Five Year Results
    Pinkawa, M.
    Berneking, V.
    Schlenter, M.
    Krenkel, B.
    Eble, M. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : S206 - S206
  • [49] 10-Year Outcomes in Localized Prostate Cancer
    Nocera, Luigi
    Karabon, Patrick
    Abdollah, Firas
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (02): : 178 - 179
  • [50] Five year outcomes of clinically localized prostate cancer in patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus
    Levinson, A. W.
    Santillo, V. M.
    Hansen, A.
    Lowe, F. C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (15)