Outcomes Following Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement SWEDEHEART Observational Study

被引:48
|
作者
Rack, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
Saleh, Nawzad [1 ,2 ]
Glaser, Natalie [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Stockholm South Gen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Sjukhusbacken 10, SE-11883 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
cardiovascular implantable electronic device; survival; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; CONDUCTION DISTURBANCES; RISK-FACTORS; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.043
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES This study was performed to investigate long-term, clinically important outcomes in patients who underwent permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND The impact of permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVR is unknown, and prior studies have produced conflicting results. METHODS In this nationwide, population-based cohort study, the study included all patients who underwent transfe-moral TAVR in Sweden from 2008 to 2018 from the SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) register. Additional baseline characteristics and information about outcomes were obtained by individual crosslinking with other national health data registers. Unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS Of 3,420 patients, 481 (14.1%) underwent permanent pacemaker implantation within 30 days after TAVR. The survival rate at 1, 5, and 10 years was 90.0%, 52.7%, and 10.9% in the pacemaker group and 92.7%, 53.8%, and 15.3% in the nonpacemaker group, respectively (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.88-1.22; P = 0.692). The median follow-up was 2.7 years (interquartile range: 2.5, and maximum 11.8 years). There was no difference in the risk of cardiovascular death (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.71-1.18; P = 0.611), heart failure (HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.92-1.63; P = 0.157), or endocarditis (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.47-1.69; P = 0.734) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS The study found no difference in long-term survival between patients who did and did not undergo permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVR. As the use of TAVR expands to include younger and low-risk patients with a long life expectancy, it will become increasingly important to understand the impact of permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVR. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2021;14:2173-2181) (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:2173 / 2181
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Cost Analysis
    Ahmad, Mansoor
    Patel, Jay N.
    Loc, Brian L.
    Vipparthy, Sharath C.
    Divecha, Chirag
    Barzallo, Pablo X.
    Kim, Minchul
    Baman, Timir
    Barzallo, Marco
    Mungee, Sudhir
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (06)
  • [22] Permanent Pacemaker Implantation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - National Experience
    Dhoble, Abhijeet
    Bhise, Viraj
    Balan, Prakash
    Nguyen, Tuyen C.
    Loyalka, Pranav
    Kar, Biswajit
    Smalling, Richard
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 68 (18) : B293 - B293
  • [23] A prediction model for permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Yiming Qi
    Xiaolei Lin
    Wenzhi Pan
    Xiaochun Zhang
    Yuefan Ding
    Shasha Chen
    Lei Zhang
    Daxin Zhou
    Junbo Ge
    European Journal of Medical Research, 28
  • [24] Quality Control for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Yazdchi, Farhang
    Hirji, Sameer
    Kaneko, Tsuyoshi
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 110 (01): : 347 - 348
  • [25] Predictors of ventricular pacing burden after permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Elzeneini, Mohammed
    Assaf, Yazan
    Aalaei-Andabili, Seyed Hossein
    Mahmoud, Ahmad
    Hamburger, Robert
    Goel, Ramil
    Bavry, Anthony A.
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 43 (11) : 1334 - 1342
  • [26] Predictors and clinical outcomes of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Chen, Bing-Ying
    Huang, Ting-Feng
    Jiang, Xin-Da
    Ding, Xiao-Yan
    Zhou, Xiao-Fen
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [27] Prognostic impact of new permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Zheng, Hua-Jie
    Yan, Chao-Jun
    Lin, De-Qing
    Cheng, Yong-Bo
    Yu, San-Jiu
    Li, Jun
    Zhang, Xian-Pu
    Cheng, Wei
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 102 (04) : 743 - 750
  • [28] The Effect of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Upon Survival
    Oikonomou, George
    Toutouzas, Konstantinos
    Drakopoulou, Maria
    Soulaidopoulos, Stergios
    Stathogiannis, Konstantinos
    Xanthopoulou, Maria
    Toskas, Pantelis
    Trantalis, George
    Latsios, George
    Tousoulis, Dimitrios
    CIRCULATION, 2019, 140
  • [29] The Impact of Previous Permanent Pacemaker on Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Magalhaes, Marco A.
    Minha, Sa'ar
    Barbash, Israel M.
    Badr, Salem
    Kitabata, Hironori
    Alfazir, Omar
    Lakshmana, Pendyala
    Loh, Joshua P.
    Ota, Hideaki
    Ben-Dor, Itsik
    Torguson, Rebecca
    Chen, Fang
    Okubagzi, Petros
    Suddath, William O.
    Kent, Kenneth M.
    Satler, Lowell F.
    Pichard, Augusto D.
    Waksman, Ron
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (22)
  • [30] Rates of Late Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Kawsara, Akram
    Berzingi, Chalak
    Alkhouli, Mohamad
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 182 : 104 - 105