Evaluation of the Seventh American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma in Comparison With the Sixth Classification

被引:193
|
作者
Ahn, Hye Seong
Lee, Hyuk Joon
Hahn, Seokyung [2 ]
Kim, Woo Ho [3 ]
Lee, Kuhn Uk
Sano, Takeshi [4 ]
Edge, Stephen B. [5 ]
Yang, Han-Kwang [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Canc Res Inst, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Med Res Collaborating Ctr, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[4] Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Surg Oncol, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
关键词
gastric adenocarcinoma; American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer; Classification; survival; pathology; surgery; LYMPH-NODE METASTASIS; CARCINOMA; SUBCLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.25550
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The seventh TNM staging system for gastric cancer of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer (AJCC/UICC) had a more detailed classification than the sixth TNM staging system for both the tumor (T) and lymph nodes (N) The authors compared survival rates assessed by the seventh staging system with those by the sixth system METHODS The authors analyzed the prospectively collected database on patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgery at Seoul National University Hospital between 1986 and 2006 and calculated the survival rates of 9998 cases with primary cancer RO resection and >14 retrieved lymph nodes RESULTS The 5-year cumulative survival rates (5YSR) according to the seventh edition T or N classifications were significantly different The 5YSR according to seventh edition of the TNM staging system were 95 1% (stage IA) 88 4% (stage IB) 84 0% (stage IIA) 71 7% (stage IIB) 58 4% (stage IIIA) 41 3% (stage IIIB) and 26 1% (stage IIIC) which were significantly different from each other The 5YSR of the seventh edition T2 and 13 classifications had significant differences in patients with every N classification and the 5YSR of seventh edition N1 and N2 classifications had significant differences in T2 patients T3 patients and T4 patients Each stage in the sixth edition was divided into the seventh edition stage with different survival rates In addition the number of homogenous groupings in seventh edition TNM stages was increased from 1 to 2 CONCLUSIONS The seventh system provided a more detailed classification of prognosis than the sixth system especially between T2 and T3 tumors and N1 and N2 tumors although further studies were found to be needed for the N3a and N3b classification Cancer 2010,116 5592-8 (C) 2010 American Cancer Society
引用
收藏
页码:5592 / 5598
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of the sixth, seventh, and eighth editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor-Node-Metastasis staging system for gastric cancer A single institution experience
    Chen, Mei-Wen
    Yen, Hsu-Heng
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (39) : E27358
  • [22] TNM Seventh Edition: What's New, What's Changed Communication From the International Union Against Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer
    Sobin, Leslie H.
    Compton, Carolyn C.
    CANCER, 2010, 116 (22) : 5336 - 5339
  • [23] Modified staging classification for gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas on the basis of the American Joint Committee on cancer
    Xie, J.
    Chang-Ming, H.
    Zheng, C.
    Li, P.
    Lin, J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [24] Modified staging classification for gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas on the basis of the American Joint Committee on Cancer
    Huang Changming
    Xie Jian-Wei
    Zheng Chao-Hui
    Li Ping
    Wang Jia-Bin
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [25] Validation of the Seventh Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer
    Jung, Hun
    Lee, Han Hong
    Song, Kyo Young
    Jeon, Hae Myung
    Park, Cho Hyun
    CANCER, 2011, 117 (11) : 2371 - 2378
  • [26] Introduction of the 7th Edition Eyelid Carcinoma Classification System From the American Joint Committee on Cancer-International Union Against Cancer Staging Manual
    Ainbinder, Darryl J.
    Esmaeli, Bita
    Groo, Stephen C.
    Finger, Paul T.
    Brooks, Joseph P.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2009, 133 (08) : 1256 - 1261
  • [27] Comparison of the Seventh and Eighth Editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging System for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
    Kim, Mijin
    Kim, Won Gu
    Oh, Hye-Seon
    Park, Suyeon
    Kwon, Hyemi
    Song, Dong Eun
    Kim, Tae Yong
    Shong, Young Kee
    Kim, Won Bae
    Sung, Tae-Yon
    Jeon, Min Ji
    THYROID, 2017, 27 (09) : 1149 - 1155
  • [28] AMERICAN-JOINT-COMMITTEE-ON-CANCER CLASSIFICATION FOR MELANOMA - REPLY
    LIPTON, A
    BALCH, CM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 10 (02) : 345 - 346
  • [29] A COMPARISON OF HO, INTERNATIONAL-UNION-AGAINST-CANCER, AND AMERICAN-JOINT-COMMITTEE-STAGE-CLASSIFICATIONS-FOR-NASOPHARYNGEAL-CARCINOMA
    TEO, PML
    LEUNG, SF
    YU, P
    TSAO, SY
    FOO, W
    SHIU, W
    CANCER, 1991, 67 (02) : 434 - 439
  • [30] Seventh Edition of TNM Classification for Gastric Cancer
    Biondi, Alberto
    Hyung, Woo Jin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (32) : 4338 - 4339