Development of a model to predict electroencephalographic seizures in critically ill children

被引:18
|
作者
Fung, France W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jacobwitz, Marin [1 ]
Parikh, Darshana S. [1 ,4 ]
Vala, Lisa [5 ]
Donnelly, Maureen [5 ]
Fan, Jiaxin [6 ]
Xiao, Rui [6 ]
Topjian, Alexis A. [4 ,7 ]
Abend, Nicholas S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Pediat, Div Neurol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Neurol, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Pediat, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Neurodiagnost, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
critical care; EEG monitoring; electroencephalogram; pediatric; seizure; status epilepticus; NONCONVULSIVE STATUS EPILEPTICUS; TRAUMATIC BRAIN-INJURY; CONTINUOUS VIDEO-EEG; ELECTROGRAPHIC SEIZURES; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; COMATOSE CHILDREN; ADULTS; COMMON; PROBABILITY; TERMINOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/epi.16448
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Electroencephalographic seizures (ESs) are common in encephalopathic critically ill children, but ES identification with continuous electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring (CEEG) is resource-intense. We aimed to develop an ES prediction model that would enable clinicians to stratify patients by ES risk and optimally target limited CEEG resources. We aimed to determine whether incorporating data from a screening EEG yielded better performance characteristics than models using clinical variables alone. Methods We performed a prospective observational study of 719 consecutive critically ill children with acute encephalopathy undergoing CEEG in the pediatric intensive care unit of a quaternary care institution between April 2017 and February 2019. We identified clinical and EEG risk factors for ES. We evaluated model performance with area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), validated the optimal model with the highest AUC using a fivefold cross-validation, and calculated test characteristics emphasizing high sensitivity. We applied the optimal operating slope strategy to identify the optimal cutoff to define whether a patient should undergo CEEG. Results The incidence of ES was 26%. Variables associated with increased ES risk included age, acute encephalopathy category, clinical seizures prior to CEEG initiation, EEG background, and epileptiform discharges. Combining clinical and EEG variables yielded better model performance (AUC 0.80) than clinical variables alone (AUC 0.69; P < .01). At a 0.10 cutoff selected to emphasize sensitivity, the optimal model had a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 37%, positive predictive value of 34%, and negative predictive value of 93%. If applied, the model would limit 29% of patients from undergoing CEEG while failing to identify 8% of patients with ES. Significance A model employing readily available clinical and EEG variables could target limited CEEG resources to critically ill children at highest risk for ES, making CEEG-guided management a more viable neuroprotective strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:498 / 508
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Epileptic seizures in critically ill patients
    Stasiukyniene, Virginija
    Pilvinis, Vidas
    Reingardiene, Dagmara
    Janauskaite, Liuda
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2009, 45 (06): : 501 - 507
  • [32] Prevalence of non-convulsive seizures and electroencephalographic abnormalities in critically ill patients-A retrospective observational study
    Karki, Bipin
    Shrestha, Pramesh S.
    Shrestha, Ninadini
    Shilpakar, Olita
    Acharya, Subhash P.
    Neupane, Ashru
    EPILEPSIA OPEN, 2024, 9 (01) : 325 - 332
  • [33] Periodic and rhythmic patterns in critically ill children: Incidence, interrater agreement, and seizures
    Fung, France W.
    Parikh, Darshana S.
    Massey, Shavonne L.
    Fitzgerald, Mark P.
    Vala, Lisa
    Donnelly, Maureen
    Jacobwitz, Marin
    Kessler, Sudha K.
    Topjian, Alexis A.
    Abend, Nicholas S.
    EPILEPSIA, 2021, 62 (12) : 2955 - 2967
  • [34] Nonconvulsive seizures among critically ill children Look and you shall find
    Hahn, Cecil D.
    NEUROLOGY, 2011, 76 (12) : 1036 - 1037
  • [35] Intravenous levetiracetam in critically ill children with status epilepticus or acute repetitive seizures
    Abend, Nicholas S.
    Monk, Heather M.
    Licht, Daniel J.
    Dlugos, Dennis J.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 10 (04) : 505 - 510
  • [36] Electrographic Characteristics of Seizures in Critically Ill Children Undergoing Continuous EEG Monitoring
    France, F.
    Jacobwitz, M.
    Vala, L.
    Donnelly, M.
    Fitzgerald, M.
    Massey, S.
    Martinez, A.
    Topjian, A.
    Abend, N.
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2018, 84 : S334 - S335
  • [37] Clinical Correlates of Electroencephalographic Patterns in Critically Ill Patients
    Nazish, Saima
    Zafar, Azra
    Shariff, Erum
    Shahid, Rizwana
    Alamri, Sara
    Albakr, Aisha
    CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 52 (04) : 287 - 295
  • [38] Development of a Heart Rate Variability Risk Score to Predict Organ Dysfunction and Death in Critically Ill Children
    Badke, Colleen M.
    Marsillio, Lauren E.
    Carroll, Michael S.
    Weese-Mayer, Debra E.
    Sanchez-Pinto, L. Nelson
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (08) : E437 - E447
  • [39] Use of risk stratification indices to predict mortality in critically ill children
    Casamassima, Maria Grazia Sacco
    Salazar, Jose H.
    Papandria, Dominic
    Fackler, James
    Chrouser, Kristin
    Boss, Emily F.
    Abdullah, Fizan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2014, 173 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [40] Use of risk stratification indices to predict mortality in critically ill children
    Maria Grazia Sacco Casamassima
    Jose H. Salazar
    Dominic Papandria
    James Fackler
    Kristin Chrouser
    Emily F. Boss
    Fizan Abdullah
    European Journal of Pediatrics, 2014, 173 : 1 - 13