Hybrid kinematic - visual sensing approach for activity recognition of construction equipment

被引:20
|
作者
Kim, Jinwoo [1 ,2 ]
Chi, Seokho [2 ,3 ]
Ahn, Changbum Ryan [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Inst Construct & Environm Engn, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Construct Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING | 2021年 / 44卷 / 44期
关键词
Construction equipment; Activity recognition; Hybrid sensing; Kinematic sensing; Visual sensing; EXCAVATORS; NETWORKS; TRACKING; FEATURES; SENSORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102709
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Activity recognition of construction equipment is vital for operational productivity and safety analysis. For automated equipment monitoring, many researchers have developed kinematic or visual sensing approaches and found that the two approaches have their own technical advantages and disadvantages in classifying different types of equipment activities. However, since previous methods adopted only one of kinematic or visual sensing, there is a limitation to fully benefit from both approaches, causing difficulty in monitoring construction equipment precisely. Additionally, despite the great potential of data fusion, the hybrid effects of kinematic-visual sensing are still unclear. To fill such knowledge gaps, this study developed a hybrid kinematic-visual sensing approach and investigated its impacts on the recognition of equipment activities. Specifically, a smartphone was installed inside the equipment's cabin, and kinematic and visual data were collected from its built-in sensors, gyroscopes, accelerometers, and cameras. Total 60-min data were collected, and the data were further split into training (40-min) and testing data (20-min). The data were then used to experiment three different models: kinematic, visual, and hybrid models. In the experiments, the average F-score of the hybrid model was 77.4%, whereas those of kinematic and visual models were 61.7% and 72.4%, respectively. These results indicated that the hybrid sensing could improve the recognition performance and monitor construction equipment better than relying only on sole type of data sources. The findings can contribute to more reliable activity recognition and operation analysis of construction equipment, and provide meaningful insights for future research.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Human Daily Activity Recognition for Healthcare Using Wearable and Visual Sensing Data
    Liu, Xi
    Liu, Lei
    Simske, Steven J.
    Liu, Jerry
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS (ICHI), 2016, : 24 - 31
  • [22] A hybrid approach to inferring the Internet of Things for complex activity recognition
    Qingjuan Li
    Huansheng Ning
    Tao Zhu
    Shan Cui
    Liming Chen
    EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2019
  • [23] A hybrid approach to inferring the Internet of Things for complex activity recognition
    Li, Qingjuan
    Ning, Huansheng
    Zhu, Tao
    Cui, Shan
    Chen, Liming
    EURASIP JOURNAL ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING, 2019, 2019 (01)
  • [24] MANUFACTURERS APPROACH TO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SAFETY
    LARMORE, HT
    SAE TRANSACTIONS, 1969, 78 : 113 - &
  • [25] Human activity recognition based on kinematic features
    Hernandez, J.
    Cabido, R.
    Montemayor, A. S.
    Pantrigo, J. J.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2014, 31 (04) : 345 - 353
  • [26] Compressed Sensing of Monitoring Signals for Power Distribution Equipment and Equipment Abnormal Recognition
    Wang Y.
    Li Y.
    Zhao H.
    Wang L.
    Zhao Y.
    Gaodianya Jishu/High Voltage Engineering, 2022, 48 (01): : 11 - 19
  • [27] Hybrid Sensing Face Detection and Recognition
    Zhou, Mingyuan
    Lin, Haiting
    Yu, Jingyi
    Young, S. Susan
    2015 IEEE APPLIED IMAGERY PATTERN RECOGNITION WORKSHOP (AIPR), 2015,
  • [28] Time lag between visual attention and brain activity in construction fall hazard recognition
    Liu, Mei
    Liang, Mingxuan
    Yuan, Jingyi
    Wang, Jiaming
    Liao, Pin-Chao
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 168
  • [29] Wearable Sensing For Activity Recognition
    Gan, O. P.
    IECON 2017 - 43RD ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY, 2017, : 8825 - 8830
  • [30] A VISUAL APPROACH TO MELODY RECOGNITION
    DYSON, M
    BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1983, 36 (NOV): : A96 - A96