Hybrid kinematic - visual sensing approach for activity recognition of construction equipment

被引:20
|
作者
Kim, Jinwoo [1 ,2 ]
Chi, Seokho [2 ,3 ]
Ahn, Changbum Ryan [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Inst Construct & Environm Engn, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Construct Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING | 2021年 / 44卷 / 44期
关键词
Construction equipment; Activity recognition; Hybrid sensing; Kinematic sensing; Visual sensing; EXCAVATORS; NETWORKS; TRACKING; FEATURES; SENSORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102709
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Activity recognition of construction equipment is vital for operational productivity and safety analysis. For automated equipment monitoring, many researchers have developed kinematic or visual sensing approaches and found that the two approaches have their own technical advantages and disadvantages in classifying different types of equipment activities. However, since previous methods adopted only one of kinematic or visual sensing, there is a limitation to fully benefit from both approaches, causing difficulty in monitoring construction equipment precisely. Additionally, despite the great potential of data fusion, the hybrid effects of kinematic-visual sensing are still unclear. To fill such knowledge gaps, this study developed a hybrid kinematic-visual sensing approach and investigated its impacts on the recognition of equipment activities. Specifically, a smartphone was installed inside the equipment's cabin, and kinematic and visual data were collected from its built-in sensors, gyroscopes, accelerometers, and cameras. Total 60-min data were collected, and the data were further split into training (40-min) and testing data (20-min). The data were then used to experiment three different models: kinematic, visual, and hybrid models. In the experiments, the average F-score of the hybrid model was 77.4%, whereas those of kinematic and visual models were 61.7% and 72.4%, respectively. These results indicated that the hybrid sensing could improve the recognition performance and monitor construction equipment better than relying only on sole type of data sources. The findings can contribute to more reliable activity recognition and operation analysis of construction equipment, and provide meaningful insights for future research.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Hybrid Kinematic-Acoustic System for Automated Activity Detection of Construction Equipment
    Sherafat, Behnam
    Rashidi, Abbas
    Lee, Yong-Cheol
    Ahn, Changbum R.
    SENSORS, 2019, 19 (19)
  • [2] Automated Activity Recognition of Construction Equipment Using a Data Fusion Approach
    Sherafat, Behnam
    Rashidi, Abbas
    Lee, Yong-Cheol
    Ahn, Changbum R.
    COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING 2019: DATA, SENSING, AND ANALYTICS, 2019, : 1 - 8
  • [3] Equipment activity recognition and early fault detection in automated construction through a hybrid machine learning framework
    Harichandran, Aparna
    Raphael, Benny
    Mukherjee, Abhijit
    COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2023, 38 (02) : 253 - 268
  • [4] Activity Recognition of Construction Equipment Using Generated Sound Data
    Sherafat, Behnam
    Rashidi, Abbas
    Asgari, Sadegh
    COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING 2021, 2022, : 213 - 220
  • [5] Activity recognition of construction equipment using fractional random forest
    Langroodi, Armin Kassemi
    Vahdatikhaki, Faridaddin
    Doree, Andre
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 122
  • [6] HUMAN ACTIVITY RECOGNITION AND MOBILE SENSING FOR CONSTRUCTION SIMULATION
    Nath, Nipun D.
    Shrestha, Prabhat
    Behzadan, Amir H.
    2017 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2017, : 2448 - 2459
  • [7] Towards a Hybrid Approach for Remote Sensing Ontology Construction
    Nasri, Bochra
    Nefzi, Hafedh
    Farah, Mohamed
    2018 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES FOR SIGNAL AND IMAGE PROCESSING (ATSIP), 2018,
  • [8] A hybrid learning approach for better recognition of visual objects
    Imam, IF
    Gutta, S
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTEENTH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE EIGHTH INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1996, : 1104 - 1109
  • [9] Entity Recognition Approach of Equipment Failure Text for Knowledge Graph Construction
    Tian J.
    Song H.
    Chen L.
    Sheng G.
    Jiang X.
    Dianwang Jishu/Power System Technology, 2022, 46 (10): : 3913 - 3922
  • [10] A Hybrid Visual Transformer for Efficient Deep Human Activity Recognition
    Djenouri, Youcef
    Belbachir, Ahmed Nabil
    2023 IEEE/CVF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION WORKSHOPS, ICCVW, 2023, : 721 - 730