Likelihood-based concordance tests for analysis of ascertained twin pair multinomial data

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Jason Kunming [2 ]
Liu, Alyssa Yanzhen [3 ]
Tai, John Jen [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fu Jen Catholic Univ, Dept Stat & Informat Sci, Coll Management, New Taipei City 242, Taiwan
[2] Takming Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Banking & Finance, Coll Finance, Taipei 11451, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Div Biostat, Coll Publ Hlth, Taipei 100, Taiwan
关键词
Dirichlet-multinomial model; overall casewise concordance; probandwise concordance; self-contained subset method; truncated data; MULTIPLE-REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELF-CONTAINED SUBSETS; DICHOTOMOUS TRAIT; GENETIC VARIANCE; BINARY TRAIT; OUTCOMES; MODEL; SEGREGATION; SAMPLES;
D O I
10.1002/sim.4381
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The classic twin model design has a wide application in human genetics. Under the assumption that nongenetic effects are shared to the same degree by monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs, a test of the equality of casewise concordances between MZ and DZ twins provides a clue to the influence of genetic and environmental factors on a disease. The casewise concordance is the conditional probability that given that one member of a twin pair is affected, the other is also affected. When disease prevalence is low or cost-effectiveness is considered, collection of twin pairs by ascertainment for performing casewise concordance analysis is required. In this article, by defining an overall casewise concordance parameter, several likelihood-based tests, such as likelihood ratio test LR, score test Score, the usual Wald test Wald and an alternative Wald test WaldA are investigated for a test of the equality of concordances between ascertained MZ and DZ twin pairs under multinomial models. Simulation studies were conducted for data with small sample sizes. The results show that the type I error rates and power of LR and Score are stable only when the overall casewise concordances are not extremely small or large. The Wald has higher power performance in most cases but would slightly inflate type I error rates; the WaldA is the most robust and recommended approach. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 79
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LIKELIHOOD-BASED DIMENSION FOLDING ON TENSOR DATA
    Wang, Ning
    Zhang, Xin
    Li, Bing
    STATISTICA SINICA, 2022, 32 : 2405 - 2429
  • [22] A Likelihood-Based Approach for Missing Genotype Data
    D'Angelo, Gina M.
    Kamboh, M. Ilyas
    Feingold, Eleanor
    HUMAN HEREDITY, 2010, 69 (03) : 171 - 183
  • [23] Likelihood-based modeling and analysis of data underdispersed relative to the Poisson distribution
    Faddy, MJ
    Bosch, RJ
    BIOMETRICS, 2001, 57 (02) : 620 - 624
  • [24] A likelihood-based boosting algorithm for factor analysis models with binary data
    Battauz, Michela
    Vidoni, Paolo
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2022, 168
  • [25] TWINAN90 - A FORTRAN PROGRAM FOR CONDUCTING ANOVA-BASED AND LIKELIHOOD-BASED ANALYSES OF TWIN DATA
    WILLIAMS, CJ
    CHRISTIAN, JC
    NORTON, JA
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 1992, 38 (2-3) : 167 - 176
  • [26] Erratum to: Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics
    Glen Cowan
    Kyle Cranmer
    Eilam Gross
    Ofer Vitells
    The European Physical Journal C, 2013, 73
  • [27] Some reasoning on the RELM-CSEP likelihood-based tests
    Anna Maria Lombardi
    Earth, Planets and Space, 66
  • [28] On local power of likelihood-based tests in von Mises regressions
    Lemonte, Artur J.
    STATISTICS, 2024, 58 (04) : 881 - 891
  • [29] Some reasoning on the RELM-CSEP likelihood-based tests
    Lombardi, Anna Maria
    EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2014, 66
  • [30] Likelihood-based analysis of outcome-dependent sampling designs with longitudinal data
    Zelnick, Leila R.
    Schildcrout, Jonathan S.
    Heagerty, Patrick J.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2018, 37 (13) : 2120 - 2133