Nomogram Predicting Parametrial Involvement Based on the Radical Hysterectomy Specimens in the Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Li, Chunbo [1 ]
Yang, Shimin [1 ]
Hua, Keqin [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Obstet & Gynecol Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2021年 / 8卷
关键词
cervical cancer; nomogram; parametrial involvement; radical hysterectomy; decision curve analysis; STROMAL INVASION; CLASS-I; SURGERY; WOMEN; RISK;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2021.759026
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Radical hysterectomy (RH) is the surgical standard for the treatment of the early-stage cervical cancer (CC). However, this procedure is associated with a high rate of adverse impact on the quality of the life of the patient. Since the rate of parametrial involvement (PI) is low for the patients with the early-stage CC, some authors believe that the patients with the early-stage CC may benefit from the less radical surgery. This study aims to estimate the incidence of the PI in the patients with the early-stage CC and establish a simple nomogram to identify a cohort of the patients with low risk of the PI who may benefit from the less radical surgery.</p> Methods: All the patients who underwent the RH and pelvic lymphadenectomy were included from 2013 to 2018. The significant independent predictors were identified through the Cox regression analysis and then incorporated into a nomogram to predicate the PI. The calibration plots and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the predictive accuracy of the nomogram.</p> Results: A total of 4,533 patients met the inclusion criteria and 441 women (9.7%) had the PI. The positive PI rate in the <= 2 cm group (1.2%) was significantly lower compared to >2- <= 4 cm (6.2%) or >4 cm (22.4%) groups. The multivariate analyses revealed that tumor size (p = 0.002), lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (p = 0.001), vaginal involvement (VI) (p < 0.001), status of the pelvic lymph nodes (PLNs) (p = 0.001), and depth of stromal invasion (DSI) (p < 0.001) were the independent prognostic factors of the PI. Finally, the five variables were combined to construct the nomogram model. The concordance indexes (C-indexes) of the PI were 0.756 (95% CI 0.726-0.786) for the internal validation and 0.729 (95% CI 0.678-0.780) for the external validation. The calibration plots further showed good consistency between the nomogram prediction and the actual observation.</p> Conclusion: This study confirmed that the patients with tumor size 2 cm or smaller were at very low risk for the PI. If other variables such as negative LVSI, DSI <50%, no VI, and negative PLN were limited, the risk would reduce significantly. Meanwhile, a simple nomogram based on the significant clinicopathological characteristics could be used as a tool for the clinicians to predict the PI among the patients with the early-stage CC, who might benefit from a less radical surgery.</p>
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic and robotic techniques for radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    Soliman, Pamela T.
    Schmeler, Kathleen M.
    dos Reis, Ricardo
    Frumovitz, Michael
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 110 (03) : S21 - S24
  • [32] Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Melamed, Alexander
    Margul, Daniell J.
    Chen, Ling
    Keating, Nancy L.
    del Carmen, Marcela G.
    Yang, Junhua
    Seagle, Brandon-Luke L.
    Alexander, Amy
    Barber, Emma L.
    Rice, Laurel W.
    Wright, Jason D.
    Kocherginsky, Masha
    Shahabi, Shohreh
    Rauh-Hain, J. Alejandro
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (20): : 1905 - 1914
  • [33] PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF EARLY-STAGE CERVICAL-CANCER TREATED BY RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY
    SEVIN, BU
    NADJI, M
    LAMPE, B
    LU, Y
    HILSENBECK, S
    KOECHLI, OR
    AVERETTE, HE
    CANCER, 1995, 76 (10) : 1978 - 1986
  • [34] LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY COMPARED TO LAPAROTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY-STAGE CERVICAL CANCER
    Klasa, L.
    Sawicki, S.
    Wydra, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 : A235 - A235
  • [35] Primary therapy for early-stage cervical cancer: radical hysterectomy vs radiation
    Bansal, Nisha
    Herzog, Thomas J.
    Shaw, Richard E.
    Burke, William M.
    Deutsch, Israel
    Wright, Jason D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (05) : 485.e1 - 485.e9
  • [36] Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Di Donato, Violante
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    Chiantera, Vito
    Sozzi, Giulio
    D'Auge, Tullio Golia
    Muzii, Ludovico
    Panici, Pierluigi Benedetti
    D'Oria, Ottavia
    Vizza, Enrico
    Giannini, Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (18)
  • [37] Bone recurrence after radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer
    Cakir, Caner
    Yuksel, Dilek
    Kilic, Cigdem
    Unsal, Mehmet
    Dur, Riza
    Boyraz, Gokhan
    Karalok, Alper
    Tekin, Ozlem Moraloglu
    Turan, Taner
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 16 (04) : 266 - 270
  • [38] Open radical hysterectomy: The new standard of care in early-stage cervical cancer
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    Pareja, Rene
    Viveros-Carreno, David
    Frumovitz, Michael
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 (08) : 851 - 855
  • [39] Association of Radical Hysterectomy Surgical Volume and Survival for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Matsuo, Koji
    Shimada, Muneaki
    Yamaguchi, Satoshi
    Matoda, Maki
    Nakanishi, Toru
    Kikkawa, Fumitaka
    Ohmichi, Masahide
    Okamoto, Aikou
    Sugiyama, Toru
    Mikami, Mikio
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 (06): : 1086 - 1098
  • [40] Intratumoural and peritumoural MRI radiomics nomogram for predicting parametrial invasion in patients with early-stage cervical adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma
    Xiao, Mei Ling
    Fu, Le
    Wei, Yan
    Liu, Ai E.
    Cheng, Jie Jun
    Ma, Feng Hua
    Li, Hai Ming
    Li, Yong Ai
    Lin, Zi Jing
    Zhang, Guo Fu
    Qiang, Jin Wei
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (02) : 852 - 862