Comparison of 1.5- and 4.0-tesla magnetic resonance imaging examinations of patients with multiple sclerosis

被引：0
|
作者：
Karlik, SJ
Erskine, MK
Rice, GP
机构：
来源：
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY | 1998年 / 44卷 / 03期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号：
摘要：
T165
引用
收藏
页码：483 / 483
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 3.0 Tesla vs 1.5 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients
    Butler, Reni S.
    Chen, Christine
    Vashi, Reena
    Hooley, Regina J.
    Philpotts, Liane E.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 5 (08): : 285 - 294
  • [32] Clinical 1.5 tesla and "Specialist" 3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging in presurgical epilepsy
    Wieshmann, UC
    Keller, S
    Roberts, N
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 76 (09): : 1315 - 1316
  • [33] The utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3 Tesla for detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with 1.5 Tesla
    Cheng, A. S. H.
    Pegg, T. J.
    Karamitsos, T. D.
    Robson, M. D.
    Searle, N.
    Jerosch-Herold, M.
    Choudhury, R. P.
    Banning, A. P.
    Neubauer, S.
    Selvanayagam, J. B.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 : 275 - 275
  • [34] Magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography - Quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0 Tesla with 1.5 Tesla
    Schindera, Sebastian T.
    Miller, Chad M.
    Ho, Lisa M.
    DeLong, David M.
    Merkle, Elmar M.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2007, 42 (06) : 399 - 405
  • [35] Reduced Power Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging of the Prostate at 4.0 Tesla
    Near, Jamie
    Romagnoli, Cesare
    Bartha, Robert
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2009, 61 (02) : 273 - 281
  • [36] Comparison between synthetic and conventional magnetic resonance imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis and controls
    Francesca Di Giuliano
    Silvia Minosse
    Eliseo Picchi
    Girolama Alessandra Marfia
    Valerio Da Ros
    Massimo Muto
    Mario Muto
    Chiara Adriana Pistolese
    Andrea Laghi
    Francesco Garaci
    Roberto Floris
    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2020, 33 : 549 - 557
  • [37] Comparison between synthetic and conventional magnetic resonance imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis and controls
    Di Giuliano, Francesca
    Minosse, Silvia
    Picchi, Eliseo
    Marfia, Girolama Alessandra
    Da Ros, Valerio
    Muto, Massimo
    Muto, Mario
    Pistolese, Chiara Adriana
    Laghi, Andrea
    Garaci, Francesco
    Floris, Roberto
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (04) : 549 - 557
  • [38] A comparison of metabolite ratios obtained with spectroscopy at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: application to patients with multiple sclerosis
    Bagnato, F.
    Jones, D.
    Grodosfky, S.
    Barnett, A.
    Chin, A.
    Ohayon, J.
    Van der Veen, J. W.
    Shen, J.
    McFarland, H.
    Weinberger, D. R.
    Marenco, S.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2007, 13 : S74 - S75
  • [39] Functional magnetic resonance imaging of lateral geniculate nucleus at 1.5 Tesla
    Miki, A
    Raz, J
    Haselgrove, JC
    van Erp, TGM
    Liu, CSJ
    Liu, GT
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 20 (04) : 285 - 287
  • [40] TECHNICAL ASPECTS ON MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF THE SPINE AT 1.5 TESLA
    HOLTAS, SL
    PLEWES, DB
    SIMON, JH
    EKHOLM, S
    KIDO, DK
    UTZ, R
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 1987, 28 (04) : 375 - 381
12345