Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate

被引:2
|
作者
Byrne, Christopher M.
Harrison, James D.
Young, Jane M.
Selby, Warwick S.
机构
[1] Sydney S W Area Hlth Serv, Surg Outcomes Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, AW Marrow Gastroenterol & Liver Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Dept Med, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
randomized controlled trials; questionnaires; inflammatory bowel diseases;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.005
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To determine whether including the study questionnaire with a letter of invitation improves the response rate in a telephone-based survey. Study Design and Setting: This randomized controlled trial was part of a larger study to assess patient preferences for novel and controversial treatments for inflammatory bowel disease at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, a tertiary referral teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. Results: Of 270 eligible patients, 124 (46%) were randomized to receive the questionnaire plus invitation whereas 146 (54%) were in the control group receiving a letter of invitation only. The consent rate was 26% for those receiving the questionnaire and 36% for the control group. The odds ratio for consent to participate among those sent the questionnaire to those not sent the questionnaire was 0.63 (95% CI = 0.37-1.07). Conclusion: This study found that the advance mailing of a questionnaire to potential participants in a telephone survey reduced the likelihood of their participation. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1312 / 1314
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does method of distribution improve GPs' response rate in questionnaire studies?
    Brownell, LW
    Naik, PC
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2001, 55 (09) : 687 - 687
  • [22] Introductory postcards: do they increase response rate in a telephone survey of older persons?
    Iredell, H
    Shaw, T
    Howat, P
    James, R
    Granich, J
    HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2004, 19 (02) : 159 - 164
  • [23] The United Kingdom's response to the CardioPulse survey questionnaire
    Boon, Nick
    Fox, Keith
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (07) : 803 - 804
  • [24] Pre-Survey Text Messages (SMS) Improve Participation Rate in an Australian Mobile Telephone Survey: An Experimental Study
    Dal Grande, Eleonora
    Chittleborough, Catherine Ruth
    Campostrini, Stefano
    Dollard, Maureen
    Taylor, Anne Winifred
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (02):
  • [25] CORR Insights®: Small Social Incentives Did Not Improve the Survey Response Rate of Patients Who Underwent Orthopaedic Surgery: A Randomized Trial
    Patel, Mitesh S.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 477 (07) : 1657 - 1658
  • [26] Who's Calling? The Impact of Caller ID on Telephone Survey Response
    Callegaro, Mario
    McCutcheon, Allan L.
    Ludwig, Jack
    FIELD METHODS, 2010, 22 (02) : 175 - 191
  • [27] In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate
    Jepson, C
    Asch, DA
    Hershey, JC
    Ubel, PA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (01) : 103 - 105
  • [28] USE OF A DESCRIPTIVE COVER LETTER AND SECRETARY PRE-LETTER TO INCREASE RESPONSE RATE IN A MAILED SURVEY
    FURST, LG
    BLITCHINGTON, WP
    PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 32 (01) : 155 - 159
  • [29] TYPE OF TRANSMITTAL LETTER AND QUESTIONNAIRE COLOR AS 2 VARIABLES INFLUENCING RESPONSE RATES IN A MAIL SURVEY
    MATTESON, MT
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 59 (04) : 535 - 536
  • [30] Timing of electronic reminders did not improve trial participant questionnaire response: a randomized trial and meta-analyses
    Sarathy, Prasanna Partha
    Kottam, Lucksy
    Parker, Adwoa
    Brealey, Stephen
    Coleman, Elizabeth
    Keding, Ada
    Mitchell, Alex
    Northgraves, Matthew
    Torgerson, David
    Rangan, Amar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 122 : 70 - 77