Rosa spp. Extracts as a Factor That Limits the Growth of Staphylococcus spp. Bacteria, a Food Contaminant

被引:10
|
作者
Milala, Joanna [1 ]
Piekarska-Radzik, Lidia [2 ]
Sojka, Michal [1 ]
Klewicki, Robert [1 ]
Matysiak, Bozena [3 ]
Klewicka, Elzbieta [2 ]
机构
[1] Lodz Univ Technol, Fac Biotechnol & Food Sci, Inst Food Technol & Anal, Ul Stefanowskiego 4-10, PL-90924 Lodz, Poland
[2] Lodz Univ Technol, Fac Biotechnol & Food Sci, Inst Fermentat Technol & Microbiol, Ul Wolczanska 171-173, PL-90924 Lodz, Poland
[3] Natl Inst Hort Res, Dept Appl Biol, PL-96100 Skierniewice, Poland
来源
MOLECULES | 2021年 / 26卷 / 15期
关键词
Rosa spp; antibacterial activity; Staphylococcus spp; phenolic; CANINA L; ELECTROSPRAY-IONIZATION; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; PHENOLIC-COMPOUNDS; MASS-SPECTROMETRY; HIPS; ANTIOXIDANT; AUREUS; ANTIBACTERIAL; PRODUCTS;
D O I
10.3390/molecules26154590
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Due to their richness of bioactive substances, rose hips are a valuable raw material for obtaining extracts with potential antimicrobial activity. The aim of the study was to determine the antagonistic potential of whole pseudo-fruit and flesh extracts of three Rosa sp. varieties against Staphylococcus spp. bacteria isolated as food contaminants. The biological material in this study consisted of seven strains of bacteria from the genus Staphylococcus. Two strains-Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 and Staphylococcus epidermidis DSMZ 3270-were used as reference strains. The other five strains were food-derived isolates-S. epidermidis A5, S. xylosus M5, S. haemolyticus M6, S. capitis KR6, and S. warneri KR2A. The material was the pseudo-fruits of Rosa canina, Rosa pomifera Karpatia, and Rosa rugosa. The polyphenols were extracted from the fleshy part and the whole pseudo-fruit for all rose varieties. The tested preparations differed significantly in their polyphenol composition. The sum of polyphenols ranged from 28 862 to 35 358 mg/100 g of lyophilisate. The main groups of polyphenols found in the preparations were flavanols and ellagitannins. All of the tested extracts inhibited the growth of staphylococci at a concentration of 500 mg/mL. Rosa rugosa fruit extract showed the strongest antimicrobial properties among the studied extracts. For all the strains, the growth inhibition had a diameter of 20.3-29.0 mm. Moreover, six out of the seven tested strains showed the highest inhibition with the use of this extract. The MIC of rose extracts was in the range of 3.125-500 mg/mL and was strictly dependent on the bacterial species, the species of the rose, and the part of the fruit from which the extract was obtained. Correlations were assessed between the main groups of polyphenols in the extracts and their inhibition of bacterial growth. In the case of pseudo-fruit extracts, the inhibitory effect on bacterial growth positively correlated with the content of ellagitannins, and this effect was observed for almost all the tested strains. The results presented herein follow the current trend of minimising the use of chemical preservatives in food; from this point of view, rose extracts are very promising.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of extracts of Sargassum spp. in growth and antioxidants of tomato seedlings
    Sarinana-Aldaco, Oscar
    Benavides-Mendoza, Adalberto
    Juarez-Maldonado, Antonio
    Robledo-Olivo, Armando
    Maria Rodriguez-Jasso, Rosa
    Preciado-Rangel, Pablo
    Gonzalez-Morales, Susana
    ECOSISTEMAS Y RECURSOS AGROPECUARIOS, 2021, 8 (02):
  • [42] Candida spp./Bacteria Mixed Biofilms
    Rodrigues, Maria Elisa
    Gomes, Fernanda
    Rodrigues, Celia F.
    JOURNAL OF FUNGI, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [43] Phage specificity and lipopolysaccarides of stem- and root-nodulating bacteria (Azorhizobium caulinodans, Sinorhizobium spp., and Rhizobium spp.) of Sesbania spp.
    Sharma, Radhey Shyam
    Mishra, Vandana
    Mohmmed, Asif
    Babu, Cherukuri Raghavendra
    ARCHIVES OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 189 (04) : 411 - 418
  • [44] The Evaluation of Different Bacteriocinogenic Bacillus spp. with Activity Against Staphylococcus spp. and Their Beneficial and/or Hazardous Properties
    Joanna Ivy Irorita Fugaban
    Clarizza May Dioso
    Gee Hyeun Choi
    Jorge Enrique Vazquez Bucheli
    Min-Tze Liong
    Wilhelm Heinrich Holzapfel
    Svetoslav Dimitrov Todorov
    Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, 2024, 16 : 35 - 52
  • [45] Effect of antimicrobial use and production system on Campylobacter spp., Staphylococcus spp. and Salmonella spp. resistance in Spanish swine: A cross-sectional study
    Mencia-Ares, Oscar
    Arguello, Hector
    Puente, Hector
    Gomez-Garcia, Manuel
    Alvarez-Ordonez, Avelino
    Manzanilla, Edgar G.
    Carvajal, Ana
    Rubio, Pedro
    ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 68 (01) : 54 - 66
  • [46] Fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. and Bacillus spp. for phosphate solubilization and growth promotion of garlic
    Mazzuco, Vinicius Rodrigo
    Torres Jr, Claudio da Cunha
    Botelho, Gloria Regina
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA TROPICAL, 2023, 53
  • [47] Effect of plant growth regulators on propagule formation in Hemerocallis spp. and Hosta spp.
    Leclerc, M
    Caldwell, CD
    Lada, RR
    Norrie, J
    HORTSCIENCE, 2006, 41 (03) : 651 - 653
  • [48] Antimicrobial growth promoters and Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp. in poultry and swine, Denmark
    Evans, MC
    Wegener, HC
    EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 9 (04) : 489 - 492
  • [49] Prebiotic effect of honey on growth and viability of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. in milk
    Macedo, Livia Nolasco
    Luchese, Rosa Helena
    Guerra, Andre Fioravante
    Barbosa, Celso Guimaraes
    CIENCIA E TECNOLOGIA DE ALIMENTOS, 2008, 28 (04): : 935 - 942
  • [50] The Evaluation of Different Bacteriocinogenic Bacillus spp. with Activity Against Staphylococcus spp. and Their Beneficial and/or Hazardous Properties
    Fugaban, Joanna Ivy Irorita
    Dioso, Clarizza May
    Choi, Gee Hyeun
    Bucheli, Jorge Enrique Vazquez
    Liong, Min-Tze
    Holzapfel, Wilhelm Heinrich
    Todorov, Svetoslav Dimitrov
    PROBIOTICS AND ANTIMICROBIAL PROTEINS, 2024, 16 (01) : 35 - 52