Analysis of Seismic Deformation from Global Three-Decade GNSS Displacements: Implications for a Three-Dimensional Earth GNSS Velocity Field

被引:5
|
作者
Ren, Yingying [1 ]
Lian, Lizhen [2 ]
Wang, Jiexian [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Coll Surveying & Geoinformat, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Shanghai Astron Observ, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
GNSS; coordinate series; seismic deformation; ITSM; GGV2020; NONLINEAR MINIMIZATION SUBJECT; CALIFORNIA; ALGORITHM; ITRF2014;
D O I
10.3390/rs13173369
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the rapid development of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) technology, the long-term accumulated GNSS observations of global reference stations have provided valuable data for geodesy and geodynamics studies since the 1990s. Acquiring the precise velocity of GNSS stations is very important for the study of global plate movement, crustal deformation, etc. However, the seismic activities nearby some GNSS observation stations may seriously change the station's motion trajectory. Therefore, our research was motivated to propose a method allowing for station seismic deformation, and apply it to construct an updated global GNSS velocity field. The main contributions of this work included the following. Firstly, we improved the GNSS data processing procedures and seismic data selection strategies to obtain GNSS coordinate time series with mm-level precision (3-5 and 6-8 mm in the horizontal and vertical, respectively) and information of each site impacted by seismic events, which provides necessary input data for further analysis. Secondly, an Integrated Time Series Method (ITSM) concerning the effect of seismic deformation was proposed to model the station's nonlinear motion accurately. Distinguished with existing studies, all parameters including seismic relaxation time can be simultaneously estimated by ITSM, which improves the accuracy and reliability of GNSS station velocity significantly. Thirdly, to optimize the ITSM-based model, the influences of seismic relaxation time (a. 0.1 x true, b. 10 x true, c. true), parameterization mode (a. Offset + Velocity, b. Offset + Velocity + PSD, c. Offset + Velocity + PSD + Period), and the Post-Seismic Deformation (PSD) model (a. None, b. Exp, c. Log, d. Exp + Log) on results of GNSS time series analyzing were discussed. The results showed that the fitting accuracy of GNSS displacements was better than 5 mm and 10 mm in the horizontal and vertical, respectively. Finally, the global GNSS station velocity field (referred to as GGV2020 hereafter) was refined by ITSM using global GNSS observations and seismic data during 1990-2020. This not only helps interpret plate tectonic motion, establish and maintain a Dynamic Terrestrial Reference Frame (DTRF) but also contributes to better investigating geodynamic processes. GGV2020 results showed that the accuracy of global velocity was better than 1 mm/a, and the averages of Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) were 0.19 mm/a, 0.19 mm/a, and 0.33 mm/a in the north, east, and up direction, respectively. Besides, the RMSE obeys normal distribution. Compared with ITRF2014, there was a difference of about 1-2 mm/a between them due to differences in terms of observation span, processing model, and geodetic technology. Moreover, GGV2020 is expected to enrich and update the existing velocity field products to describe the characteristics of regional crustal movement in more detail, especially in Antarctica.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Earth surface deformation analysis of 2005 Qeshm earthquake based on three-dimensional displacement field derived from radar imagery measurements
    Amighpey, Masoome
    Vosooghi, Behind
    Dehghani, Maryam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2009, 11 (02): : 156 - 166
  • [22] Smoothness of the velocity field and three-dimensional surface detection from optic flow
    Andersen, GJ
    Atchley, P
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1997, 59 (03): : 358 - 369
  • [23] Smoothness of the velocity field and three-dimensional surface detection from optic flow
    George J. Andersen
    Paul Atchley
    Perception & Psychophysics, 1997, 59 : 358 - 369
  • [24] A three-dimensional surface velocity field for the Mississippi Delta: Implications for coastal restoration and flood potential
    Karegar, Makan A.
    Dixon, Timothy H.
    Malservisi, Rocco
    GEOLOGY, 2015, 43 (06) : 519 - 522
  • [25] Three-Dimensional Tomography of Coseismic Ionospheric Disturbances Following the 2018 Palu Earthquake and Tsunami from GNSS Measurements
    Cahyadi, Mokhamad Nur
    Arisa, Deasy
    Muafiry, Ihsan Naufal
    Muslim, Buldan
    Rahayu, Ririn Wuri
    Putra, Meilfan Eka
    Wulansari, Mega
    FRONTIERS IN ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2022, 9
  • [26] Three-dimensional seismic velocity structure of Mauna Loa and Kilauea volcanoes in Hawaii from local seismic tomography
    Lin, Guoqing
    Shearer, Peter M.
    Matoza, Robin S.
    Okubo, Paul G.
    Amelung, Falk
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2014, 119 (05) : 4377 - 4392
  • [27] A three-dimensional crustal seismic velocity model for southern California from a composite event method
    Lin, Guoqing
    Shearer, Peter M.
    Hauksson, Egill
    Thurber, Clifford H.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2007, 112 (B11)
  • [28] A California Statewide Three-Dimensional Seismic Velocity Model from Both Absolute and Differential Times
    Lin, Guoqing
    Thurber, Clifford H.
    Zhang, Haijiang
    Hauksson, Egill
    Shearer, Peter M.
    Waldhauser, Felix
    Brocher, Thomas M.
    Hardebeck, Jeanne
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2010, 100 (01) : 225 - 240
  • [29] THREE-DIMENSIONAL VELOCITY STRUCTURE OF THE CRUST IN CENTRAL LAKE BAIKAL FROM LOCAL SEISMIC TOMOGRAPHY
    Eponeshnikova, L. Yu.
    Duchkov, A. A.
    Sanzhieva, D. P. -D.
    Yaskevich, S. V.
    GEODYNAMICS & TECTONOPHYSICS, 2023, 14 (01):
  • [30] Three-Dimensional Seismic Velocity Structure of the Aegean Region of Turkey from Local Earthquake Tomography
    Ozer, Caglar
    Gok, Elcin
    Polat, Orhan
    ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 61 (01)