Concurrent and construct validity of scores on the timed movement battery

被引:33
|
作者
Creel, GL
Light, KE
Thigpen, MT
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Hlth Profess, Dept Phys Therapy, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Exercise & Sport Sci, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2001年 / 81卷 / 02期
关键词
activities of daily living; elderly; mobility; timed movement;
D O I
10.1093/ptj/81.2.789
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose. The Timed Movement Battery (TMB) is a new assessment tool designed to measure mobility in elderly individuals. "Mobility" was defined as a person's ability to maneuver his or her body independently in order to accomplish everyday tasks. The purpose of this study was to assess the concurrent and construct validity of scores obtained with the TMB as a measure of mobility in a group of elderly individuals who reported moderate or no difficulty in performing either basic or instrumental activities of daily living (BADL or IADL). Subjects. Thirty community-dwelling elderly people, with a mean age of 77.5 years (SD=7.0, range=65-92), participated in this study. Methods. Subjects responded to 2 questionnaires regarding their activities of daily living (ADL) (ie, Barthel Index and an 18-item ADL/IADL scale) and completed 3 assessments of mobility (ie, Berg Balance Scale, Timed "Up sc Go" Test, and the TMB). Subjects were asked to perform the items on the TMB at a "self-selected" speed (their normal speed) and at a "maximum-movement" speed (as quickly as they could safely perform the items). Subjects' scores on the TMB were cross-correlated with data for 3 criterion tests (ie, Berg Balance Scale, Timed " Up & Go" Test, Barthel Index, and the 18-item ADL/IADL scale) using Spearman rank correlations and Pearson product moment correlations. Results. Composite scores of the TMB performed at self-selected speeds correlated highly with data for the criterion tests and differentiated between those subjects reporting difficulty with ADL and those reporting no difficulty. Conclusion and Discussion. These results support the validity of scores obtained with the TMB as a measure of mobility in this sample of elderly individuals with moderate or no reported difficulty with ADL.
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 798
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Concurrent and construct validity of the AUDIT in an urban Brazilian sample
    Lima, CT
    Freire, ACC
    Silva, APB
    Teixeira, RM
    Farrell, M
    Prince, M
    ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOLISM, 2005, 40 (06): : 584 - 589
  • [22] AN EXAMINATION OF THE CONSTRUCT AND CONCURRENT VALIDITY FOR THE IRRATIONAL BELIEFS INVENTORY
    HORD, CA
    KIRK, RE
    PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 23 (2-3): : 21 - 29
  • [23] Perceived belonging in sport scale: Construct and concurrent validity
    Allen, J
    Kozub, S
    Hall, H
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 26 : S25 - S25
  • [24] Construct and concurrent validity of the Korean career indecision inventory
    Tak, J
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2006, 98 (02) : 511 - 516
  • [25] Construct, Concurrent, and Content Validity of the eoSim Laparoscopic Simulator
    Hennessey, Iain A. M.
    Hewett, Peter
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (10): : 855 - 860
  • [26] INVESTIGATING THE CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY OF THE MULTIDIMENSIONAL APTITUDE BATTERY
    WALLBROWN, FH
    CARMIN, CN
    BARNETT, RW
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1988, 62 (03) : 871 - 878
  • [27] CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY OF THE KENDRICK BATTERY WITH INSTITUTIONALIZED AGED
    FISH, M
    HAYSLIP, B
    MARCUS, S
    HAYNES, JR
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 120 (04): : 335 - 343
  • [28] NOTE ON THE CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY OF THE MULTIDIMENSIONAL APTITUDE BATTERY
    LEE, MS
    WALLBROWN, FH
    BLAHA, J
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1990, 67 (03) : 1219 - 1222
  • [29] CONCURRENT VALIDITY OF THE WISC-R FACTOR SCORES
    HALE, RL
    JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 19 (03) : 274 - 278
  • [30] Construct validity of the scores of the Chinese version of the Need for Closure Scale
    Moneta, GB
    Yip, PPY
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2004, 64 (03) : 531 - 548