The structure of the planktonic food-web in the St. Lawrence Great Lakes

被引:75
|
作者
Fahnenstiel, GL
Krause, AE
McCormick, MJ
Carrick, HJ
Schelske, CL
机构
[1] NOAA, Great Lakes Environm Res Lab, Lake Michigan Field Stn, Muskegon, MI 49441 USA
[2] NOAA, Great Lakes Environm Res Lab, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
[3] SUNY Coll Buffalo, Great Lakes Ctr, Dept Biol, Buffalo, NY 14228 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Fisheries & Aquat Sci, Gainesville, FL 32653 USA
关键词
microorganisms; planktonic food-web; Great Lakes; autotrophic; heterotrophic; picoplankton;
D O I
10.1016/S0380-1330(98)70843-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The structure of the planktonic food-web was studied during the spring (April/May) and summer (August) periods in 1993 to 1995 at twelve stations located in-the offshore region of all five Great Lakes. All components of the planktonic food-web were collected from the same water sample (with the exception of crustaceans), counted microscopically, converted to carbon units, and averaged over the euphotic zone. Due to phosphorus load reductions and the impact of non-indigenous mussels in the lower lakes, physical/chemical characteristics of the lower lakes are becoming similar to those in the upper lakes. Spring total phosphorus and euphotic zone depth were relatively similar among all the stations (except western Lake Erie), ranging from 3 to 7 mu g/L and 21 to 26 m, respectively. During the summer total phosphorus concentrations were more variable, but ranged between 4 to 10 mu g/L at all stations except western Lake Erie. Planktonic biomass was correlated with total phosphorus concentration. Within a season, the structure of the planktonic food-web was remarkably similar among all stations across all the lakes. Of the seventeen food-web structure parameters examined, only two exhibited significant differences among stations during the spring isothermal period; only four parameters exhibited significant differences among stations during the summer. Small plankton were very abundant in all the lakes. Picoplankton (0.2 to 2.0 mu m) biomass was approximately equal to the combined biomass of nannoand microplankton (2 to 200 mu m). For microorganisms (all organisms except crustaceans) autotrophic: heterotrophic ratios averaged 1.3 (spring = 1.1, summer = 1.5). The heterotrophic microorganism community was comprised of bacteria (mean = 65%), protozoans (mean = 32%), and rotifers (3%). Even though zebra mussel veligers were found in all the lakes except Lake Superior, their contribution to microorganism biomass never exceeded 1%. Due to seasonal variation in crustacean abundance, the mean contribution of major functional groups varied by season; producers (autotrophs), decomposers (bacteria), micrograzers (protozoans and rotifers), and mesograzers (crustaceans) constituted 40%, 30%, 11%, and 19% of total planktonic carbon, respectively, during the spring, and 32%, 15%, 9%, and 43%, respectively, during the summer. The overall similarity in the structure of the planktonic food-web across all stations in the Great Lakes was attributed to the strong influence of abiotic factors.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 554
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mayors' Commission to Address Water Equity in Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities
    不详
    JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2021, 113 (01): : 96 - 96
  • [22] Climate change as a driver of change in the Great Lakes St. Lawrence River Basin
    Bartolai, Alana M.
    He, Lingli
    Hurst, Ardith E.
    Mortsch, Linda
    Paehlke, Robert
    Scavia, Donald
    JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 2015, 41 : 45 - 58
  • [23] The Economic and National Significance of Connecting the Great Lakes with the Sea by the St. Lawrence Route
    Lenroot, I. L.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1928, 135 : 91 - 96
  • [24] Recent climatic trends in nearshore water temperatures in the St. Lawrence Great Lakes
    McCormick, MJ
    Fahnenstiel, GL
    LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1999, 44 (03) : 530 - 540
  • [25] Maize landraces of the St. Lawrence-Great Lakes region of North America
    Christian Azar
    Diane E. Mather
    Robert I. Hamilton
    Euphytica, 1997, 98 : 141 - 148
  • [26] From the Great Lakes flows a Great River: overview of the St. Lawrence River ecology supplement
    Jérôme Marty
    Michael R. Twiss
    Jeffrey J. Ridal
    Yves de Lafontaine
    John M. Farrell
    Hydrobiologia, 2010, 647 : 1 - 5
  • [27] From the Great Lakes flows a Great River: overview of the St. Lawrence River ecology supplement
    Marty, Jerome
    Twiss, Michael R.
    Ridal, Jeffrey J.
    de Lafontaine, Yves
    Farrell, John M.
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2010, 647 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [28] Food-web topology - Universal scaling in food-web structure?
    Camacho, J
    Arenas, A
    NATURE, 2005, 435 (7044) : E3 - E4
  • [29] GRAZING ON BACTERIA BY FLAGELLATES AND CLADOCERANS IN LAKES OF CONTRASTING FOOD-WEB STRUCTURE
    VAQUE, D
    PACE, ML
    JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH, 1992, 14 (02) : 307 - 321
  • [30] Food-web structure and functioning of temperate and tropical lakes: A stoichiometric viewpoint
    Danger, Michael
    Lacroix, Gerard
    Ka, Samba
    Ndour, El Hadji
    Corbin, Daniel
    Lazzaro, Xavier
    ANNALES DE LIMNOLOGIE-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIMNOLOGY, 2009, 45 (01) : 11 - 21