Diagnostic power of DNA methylation markers suggestive of cholangiocarcinoma in ERCP-based brush cytology

被引:8
|
作者
Prachayakul, Varayu [1 ]
Rugivarodom, Manus [1 ]
Nopjaroonsri, Papatsakorn [1 ]
Cheirsilpa, Kunsuda [1 ]
Kamolhan, Thanpawee [3 ]
Boonyaarunnate, Thiraphon [4 ]
Thuwajit, Chanitra [3 ]
Thuwajit, Peti [3 ]
Chang, Arunchai [2 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Dept Med, Siriraj GI Endoscopy Ctr, Div Gastroenterol,Fac Med,Siriraj Hosp, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Hat Yai Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol, Songkhla, Thailand
[3] Mahidol Univ, Dept Immunol, Fac Med, Siriraj Hosp, 11th Floor Adulyadejvikrom Bldg, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
[4] Mahidol Univ, Dept Pathol, Fac Med, Siriraj Hosp, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS; BILIARY STRICTURES; SENSITIVITY; PROFILES; BIOPSIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2021.07.005
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: Accurate differentiation between cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and benign biliary stricture is of paramount importance. Biliary brush cytology is a simple and safe diagnostic approach that provides relatively high specificity; however, sensitivity is limited. Previous reports indicated the aberrations of DNA methylation in CCA. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of the methylation index (MI) of HOXA1 and NEUROG1 gene promoters in CCA. Methods: Patients with biliary stricture who underwent ERCP with brush cytology in Siriraj Hospital from September 2016 to December 2019 were prospectively enrolled. The MI of HOXA1 (MI_H) and MI of NEUROG1 (MI_N) were determined by quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. The diagnostic power for CCA was tested for MI from both genes and serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). Results: Sixty-seven patients were included in the study; 41 patients had a final diagnosis of CCA, and 26 patients were determined to have a benign biliary stricture. The results showed that both MI_H and MI_N had higher sensitivity and accuracy (95.1% and 82.3% and 90.2% and 89.5%, respectively) than brush cytology (61.5% and 78.1%) and CA19-9 (69.4% and 77.8%). The combination of brush cytology, both methylation markers, and CA19-9 increased the sensitivity and accuracy to 97.4% and 91.0%. Methylation markers were positive in 5 of 6 patients with confirmed CCA whose cytology and CA19-9 were negative. Conclusions: DNA methylation increased the sensitivity for the diagnosis of CCA; therefore, the use of DNA methylation is promising for diagnosis of CCA in patients with biliary strictures. A future validation study is warranted to assess its role in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DNA Methylation Profiling in Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma Reveals Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers
    de Cubas, Aguirre A.
    Korpershoek, Esther
    Inglada-Perez, Lucia
    Letouze, Eric
    Curras-Freixes, Maria
    Fernandez, Agustin F.
    Comino-Mendez, Inaki
    Schiavi, Francesca
    Mancikova, Veronika
    Eisenhofer, Graeme
    Mannelli, Massimo
    Opocher, Guiseppe
    Timmers, Henri
    Beuschlein, Felix
    de Krijger, Ronald
    Cascon, Alberto
    Rodriguez-Antona, Cristina
    Fraga, Mario F.
    Favier, Judith
    Gimenez-Roqueplo, Anne-Paule
    Robledo, Mercedes
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 21 (13) : 3020 - 3030
  • [32] Diagnostic DNA Methylation Markers for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review
    Lommen, K.
    Vaes, N.
    Aarts, M. J.
    van Roermund, J. G.
    Schouten, L. J.
    Melotte, V.
    Tjan-Heijnen, V. C.
    van Engeland, M.
    Smits, K. M.
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2018, 246 : S41 - S41
  • [33] DNA methylation level of OPCML and SFRP1: a potential diagnostic biomarker of cholangiocarcinoma
    Amornpisutt, Rattaya
    Proungvitaya, Siriporn
    Jearanaikoon, Patcharee
    Limpaiboon, Temduang
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2015, 36 (07) : 4973 - 4978
  • [34] Diagnostic Power of DNA Methylation Classifiers for Early Detection of Cancer
    Roy, Dhruvajyoti
    Tiirikainen, Maarit
    TRENDS IN CANCER, 2020, 6 (02): : 78 - 81
  • [35] DNA Methylation Markers for Detection of Cholangiocarcinoma: Discovery, Validation, and Clinical Testing in Biliary Brushings and Plasma
    Yang, Ju Dong
    Ghoz, Hassan
    Aboelsoud, Mohammed M.
    Taylor, William R.
    Yab, Tracy C.
    Berger, Calise K.
    Cao, Xiaoming
    Foote, Patrick H.
    Giama, Nasra H.
    Fritcher, Emily G. Barr
    Mahoney, Douglas W.
    Moser, Catherine D.
    Smyrk, Thomas C.
    Kipp, Benjamin R.
    Gores, Gregory J.
    Roberts, Lewis R.
    Kisiel, John B.
    HEPATOLOGY COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 5 (08) : 1448 - 1459
  • [36] Comparative performance of methylation DNA markers, brushing cytology, and FISH in diagnosing malignant biliary strictures
    Banales, Jesus M.
    Lapitz, Ainhoa
    Fabris, Luca
    HEPATOLOGY, 2024,
  • [37] Developing DNA methylation-based diagnostic biomarkers
    Kim, Hyerim
    Wang, Xudong
    Jin, Peng
    JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2018, 45 (02) : 87 - 97
  • [38] Cancer diagnostic classifiers based on quantitative DNA methylation
    Lorincz, Attila T.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2014, 14 (03) : 293 - 305
  • [39] Developing DNA methylation-based diagnostic biomarkers
    Hyerim Kim
    Xudong Wang
    Peng Jin
    Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 2018, 45 (02) : 87 - 97
  • [40] SpyGlass® Peroral Cholangioscopy and Cholangioscopic Forceps Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Negative ERCP Brush Cytology and Negative EUS-Guided FNA Results
    Siddiqui, Ali A.
    Mehendiratta, Vaibhav
    Jackson, Whitney E.
    Loren, David E.
    Kowalski, Thomas E.
    Eloubeidi, Mohamad A.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (04) : 390 - 390