Commissioning and quality assurance of Dynamic WaveArc irradiation

被引:13
|
作者
Sato, Sayaka [1 ]
Miyabe, Yuki [1 ]
Takahashi, Kunio [2 ]
Yamada, Masahiro [1 ]
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro [1 ]
Ishihara, Yoshitomo [1 ]
Yokota, Kenji [1 ]
Kaneko, Shuji [1 ]
Mizowaki, Takashi [1 ]
Monzen, Hajime [1 ,3 ]
Hiraoka, Masahiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol & Image Appl Therapy, Kyoto, Japan
[2] Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Co Ltd, Med Syst Engn Sect, Business Dev Dept, Hiroshima, Japan
[3] Kinki Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Radiat Oncol, Osaka, Japan
来源
基金
日本科学技术振兴机构;
关键词
Vero4DRT; Dynamic WaveArc; commissioning; GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY SYSTEM; PARTIAL BREAST IRRADIATION; ARC ROTATION; DELIVERY; ACCURACY; COUCH; FEASIBILITY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5080
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A novel three-dimensional unicursal irradiation technique "Dynamic WaveArc" (DWA), which employs simultaneous and continuous gantry and O-ring rotation during dose delivery, has been implemented in Vero4DRT. The purposes of this study were to develop a commissioning and quality assurance procedure for DWA irradiation, and to assess the accuracy of the mechanical motion and dosimetric control of Vero4DRT. To determine the mechanical accuracy and the dose accuracy with DWA irradiation, 21 verification test patterns with various gantry and ring rotational directions and speeds were generated. These patterns were irradiated while recording the irradiation log data. The differences in gantry position, ring position, and accumulated MU (E-G, E-R, and E-MU, respectively) between the planned and actual values in the log at each time point were evaluated. Furthermore, the doses delivered were measured using an ionization chamber and spherical phantom. The constancy of radiation output during DWA irradiation was examined by comparison with static beam irradiation. The mean absolute error (MAE) of E-G and E-R were within 0.1 degrees and the maximum error was within 0.2 degrees. The MAE of E-MU was within 0.7 MU, and maximum error was 2.7 MU. Errors of accumulated MU were observed only around control points, changing gantry, and ring velocity. The gantry rotational range, in which E-MU was greater than or equal to 2.0 MU, was not greater than 3.2%. It was confirmed that the extent of the large differences in accumulated MU was negligibly small during the entire irradiation range. The variation of relative output value for DWA irradiation was within 0.2%, and this was equivalent to conventional arc irradiation with a rotating gantry. In conclusion, a verification procedure for DWA irradiation was designed and implemented. The results demonstrated that Vero4DRT has adequate mechanical accuracy and beam output constancy during gantry and ring rotation.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 86
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality assurance of geometric accuracy based on an electronic portal imaging device and log data analysis for Dynamic WaveArc irradiation
    Hirashima, Hideaki
    Miyabe, Yuki
    Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
    Mukumoto, Nobutaka
    Mizowaki, Takashi
    Hiraoka, Masahiro
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (03): : 234 - 242
  • [2] Establishment of patient-specific quality assurance procedure for Dynamic WaveArc delivery technique
    Hirashima, H.
    Nakamura, N.
    Miyabe, Y.
    Mukumoto, N.
    Uto, M.
    Nakamura, K.
    Mizowaki, T.
    Hiraoka, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S283 - S284
  • [3] Geometric and dosimetric quality assurance using logfiles and a 3D helical diode detector for Dynamic WaveArc
    Hirashima, Hideaki
    Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
    Miyabe, Yuki
    Mukumoto, Nobutaka
    Uto, Megumi
    Nakamura, Kiyonao
    Mizowaki, Takashi
    Hiraoka, Masahiro
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 43 : 107 - 113
  • [4] Dosimetric advantages afforded by Dynamic WaveArc therapy accelerated partial breast irradiation
    Ono, Y.
    Yoshimura, M.
    Hirata, K.
    Mukumoto, N.
    Ono, T.
    Inoue, M.
    Ogura, M.
    Mizowaki, T.
    Hiraoka, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S451 - S452
  • [5] Simple Commissioning and Quality Assurance of a Gating System
    Morin, O.
    Hsu, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
  • [6] COMMISSIONING AND QUALITY ASSURANCE OF TREATMENT PLANNING COMPUTERS
    VANDYK, J
    BARNETT, RB
    CYGLER, JE
    SHRAGGE, PC
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 26 (02): : 261 - 273
  • [7] Dosimetric advantages afforded by a new irradiation technique, Dynamic WaveArc, used for accelerated partial breast irradiation
    Ono, Yuka
    Yoshimura, Michio
    Hirata, Kimiko
    Ono, Tomohiro
    Hirashima, Hideaki
    Mukumoto, Nobutaka
    Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
    Inoue, Minoru
    Hiraoka, Masahiro
    Mizowaki, Takashi
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 48 : 103 - 110
  • [8] Commissioning and quality assurance in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment with dynamic multileaf collimator (dMLC)
    Venencia, C
    Besa, P
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (06) : 1498 - 1498
  • [9] Commissioning experience and quality assurance of helical tomotherapy machines
    Sen, Amarjit
    West, Matthew K.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 34 (04) : 194 - 199
  • [10] Commissioning and Quality Assurance of VMAT with An Ion Chamber Profiler
    Yan, G.
    Simon, T.
    Peng, L.
    Liu, C.
    Li, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)