Effects of Different Dynamics in an Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm

被引:0
|
作者
Crespi, Carolina [1 ]
Scollo, Rocco A. [1 ]
Pavone, Mario [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catania, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Viale Andrea Doria 6, I-95125 Catania, Italy
关键词
Metaheuristics; ant colony optimization; swarm intelligence; cooperation vs competitive strategies; labyrinth path finding; shortest path;
D O I
10.1109/iscmi51676.2020.9311553
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Finding shortest path in a labyrinth, made up of roads, crosses and dead ends, and where entrance and exit dynamically change during the time, is an important and challenging optimization task especially in emergency scenarios, such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and/or hurricanes. In this research work we present a study on the effects of cooperative and competitive strategies in an agent-based model using an Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) algorithm for the solution of labyrinth problem. Two different ants' search strategies in the colony have been designed: those that acts competitively and selfishly, damaging some crossings (i.e. nodes) on the path, and cooperative ones, which instead attempt to repair them. The purpose of both strategies is finding a path from the entrance to the exit in order to gain the highest number of some resources positioned appropriately at the exit and bound to he collected if and only if both types of ants reach it via the shortest path. This research work has a twofold aim, that is, finding obviously the shortest path in the labyrinth (then maximize the resources gained), as well as analyzing the effects of both strategies on the overall ACO performances, and inspecting how one strategy affects the other by motivating it to improve its performances and its efficiency. From the overall outcomes, indeed, it emerges that the existence of the competitive ants is a strong incentive for cooperative ones to improve themselves.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 11
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Network coverage optimization strategy of ant colony optimization algorithm
    Liu, Xiyu, 1600, Transport and Telecommunication Institute, Lomonosova street 1, Riga, LV-1019, Latvia (18):
  • [42] Application of ant colony optimization algorithm in process planning optimization
    Liu, Xiao-jun
    Yi, Hong
    Ni, Zhong-hua
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2013, 24 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [43] Hybrid algorithm combining ant colony optimization algorithm with genetic algorithm
    Shang, Gao
    Jiang Xinzi
    Tang Kezong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOL 5, 2007, : 701 - +
  • [44] The Ant(λ) ant colony optimization algorithm based on eligibility trace.
    Wang, XR
    Wu, TJ
    2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 4065 - 4070
  • [45] A Hybrid Algorithm Based on Particle Swarm Optimization and Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm
    Lu, Junliang
    Hu, Wei
    Wang, Yonghao
    Li, Lin
    Ke, Peng
    Zhang, Kai
    SMART COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION, SMARTCOM 2016, 2017, 10135 : 22 - 31
  • [46] A New Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm: Three Bound Ant System
    Ivkovic, Nikola
    Golub, Marin
    SWARM INTELLIGENCE, ANTS 2014, 2014, 8667 : 280 - +
  • [47] Hybrid algorithm combining ant colony optimization algorithm with particle swarm optimization
    Gao Shang
    Jiang Xin-zi
    Tang Kezong
    Yang Jingyu
    2006 CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 2006, : 481 - +
  • [48] Ant Colony Optimization with Different Crossover Schemes for Continuous Optimization
    Chen, Zhiqiang
    Jiang, Yun
    Wang, Ronglong
    BIO-INSPIRED COMPUTING - THEORIES AND APPLICATIONS, BIC-TA 2015, 2015, 562 : 56 - 62
  • [49] Ant colony optimization with different crossover schemes for global optimization
    Chen, Zhiqiang
    Wang, Rong-Long
    CLUSTER COMPUTING-THE JOURNAL OF NETWORKS SOFTWARE TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2017, 20 (02): : 1247 - 1257
  • [50] Ant colony optimization with different crossover schemes for global optimization
    Zhiqiang Chen
    Rong-Long Wang
    Cluster Computing, 2017, 20 : 1247 - 1257