The Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) Scale: A Reliable and Valid Questionnaire

被引:17
|
作者
Slok, Annerika H. M. [1 ]
Bemelmans, Thomas C. H. [1 ]
Kotz, Daniel [1 ,8 ]
van der Molen, Thys [2 ,3 ]
Kerstjens, Huib A. M. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
in 't Veen, Johannes C. C. M.
Chavannes, Niels H. [6 ]
Asijee, Guus M. [1 ]
Rutten-van Molken, Maureen P. M. H. [7 ]
van Schayck, Onno C. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Dept Family Med, POB 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Primary Care, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, GRIAC, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pulm Dis, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] St Franciscus Gasthuis, Dept Pulmonol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Leiden, Netherlands
[7] Erasmus Univ, Inst Med Technol Assessment, Inst Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[8] Univ Dusseldorf, Fac Med, Inst Gen Practice, Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
burden of disease; integrated health status; reliability; validity; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; COEFFICIENT ALPHA; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; DEPRESSION SCALE; DISEASE; DYSPNEA; FATIGUE;
D O I
10.3109/15412555.2015.1118025
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The newly developed Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) scale is a 14-item self-administered questionnaire which measures the physical, psychological, emotional and/or social burden as experienced by patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The ABC scale is part of the ABC tool that visualises the outcomes of the questionnaire. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and construct validity of the ABC scale. This multi-centre survey study was conducted in the practices of 19 general practitioners and 9 pulmonologists throughout the Netherlands. Next to the ABC scale, patients with COPD completed the Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Reliability analyses were performed with data from 162 cases. Cronbach's alpha was 0.91 for the total scale. Test-retest reliability, measured at a two week interval (n = 137), had an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.92. Analyses for convergent validity were performed with data from 133 cases. Discriminant and known-groups validity was analysed with data from 162 cases. The ABC scale total score had a strong correlation with the total score of the SGRQ (r = 0.72, p < 0.001) but a weak correlation with the forced expired volume in 1 second predicted (r = -0.28, p < 0.001). Subgroups with more severe disease, defined by GOLD-stage, frequency of exacerbations, activity level and depression scored statistically significantly (p < 0.05) worse on almost all domains of the ABC scale than the less severe subgroups. The ABC scale seems a valid and reliable tool with good discriminative properties.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 438
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The design of a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure osteoporosis knowledge in women: the Osteoporosis Knowledge Assessment Tool (OKAT)
    Tania M Winzenberg
    Brian Oldenburg
    Sue Frendin
    Graeme Jones
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 4
  • [32] The design of a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure osteoporosis knowledge in women: the Osteoporosis Knowledge Assessment Tool (OKAT)
    Winzenberg, TM
    Oldenburg, B
    Frendin, S
    Jones, G
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2003, 4 (1)
  • [33] The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System is a valid, reliable, and responsive tool to assess symptom burden in decompensated cirrhosis
    Donlan, John
    Zeng, Chengbo
    Indriolo, Teresa
    Li, Lucinda
    Zhu, Enya
    Zhou, Joyce
    Pintro, Kedie
    Horick, Nora
    Edelen, Maria
    Chung, Raymond T.
    El-Jawahri, Areej
    Ufere, Nneka N.
    HEPATOLOGY COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 8 (04)
  • [34] The Spanish lower extremity functional scale: A reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire to assess musculoskeletal disorders in the lower extremity
    Cruz-Diaz, David
    Lomas-Vega, Rafael
    Catalina Osuna-Perez, Maria
    Hita-Contreras, Fidel
    Diaz Fernandez, Angeles
    Martinez-Amat, Antonio
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 36 (23) : 2005 - 2011
  • [35] Assessment Tools: Reliable, Valid, Sensitive, and Easy!
    Chapman-Novakofski, Karen
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR, 2010, 42 (02) : 71 - 71
  • [36] PSYCHOLOGICAL-ASSESSMENT IS RELIABLE AND VALID - REPLY
    MATARAZZO, JD
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1991, 46 (08) : 882 - 884
  • [37] Reliable and Valid Assessment of Clinical Bronchoscopy Performance
    Konge, Lars
    Larsen, Klaus Richter
    Clementsen, Paul
    Arendrup, Henrik
    von Buchwald, Christian
    Ringsted, Charlotte
    RESPIRATION, 2012, 83 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [38] Is the ABC pain scale reliable for premature babies?
    Bellieni, C. V.
    Maffei, M.
    Ancora, G.
    Cordelli, D.
    Mastrocola, M.
    Faldella, G.
    Ferretti, E.
    Buonocone, G.
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2007, 96 (07) : 1008 - 1010
  • [39] Developing a Reliable and Valid Scale to Measure Psychosocial Acuity
    Klett, Stacey
    Firn, Janice
    Abney, Nina
    Battles, Alethia
    Harrington, Jack
    Vantine, Aimee
    SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE, 2014, 53 (05) : 503 - 517
  • [40] Nonrestorative sleep scale: reliable and valid for the Chinese population
    S. Li
    D. Y. T. Fong
    J. Y. H. Wong
    K. Wilkinson
    C. Shapiro
    E. P. H. Choi
    B. McPherson
    C. L. K. Lam
    M. S. M. Ip
    Quality of Life Research, 2019, 28 : 1685 - 1692