Acute hormonal and neuromuscular responses and recovery to forced vs. maximum repetitions multiple resistance exercises

被引:0
|
作者
Ahtlainen, JP
Pakarinen, A
Kraemer, WJ
Häkkinen, K
机构
[1] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Biol Phys Act, Jyvaskyla 40014, Finland
[2] Univ Jyvaskyla, Neuromuscular Res Ctr, Jyvaskyla 40014, Finland
[3] Univ Oulu, Dept Clin Chem, Oulu, Finland
[4] Univ Connecticut, Dept Kinesiol, Human Performance Lab, Storrs, CT USA
关键词
anabolic hormones; isometric force; EMG; neuromuscular fatigue; muscle damage; bodybuilding;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Acute hormonal and neuromuscular responses and recovery three days after the exercises were examined during the maximum repetitions (MR) and forced repetitions (FR) resistance exercise protocols in 16 male athletes. MR included 4 sets of leg presses, 2 sets of squats and 2 sets of knee extensions (with 12 RM) with a 2-min recovery between the sets and 4 min between the exercises. In FR the initial load was chosen to be higher than in MR so that the subject could not lift 12 repetitions per set by himself. After each set to failure the subject was assisted to perform the remaining repetitions to complete the 12 repetitions per set. Thus the exercise intensity was greater in FR than in MR. Both loading protocols led to the great acute increases (p < 0.05 = 0.001) in serum testosterone, free testosterone, cortisol and GH concentrations. However, the responses in cortisol (p < 0.05) and GH (p < 0.01) were larger in FR than in MR. The decrease of 56.5 % (p < 0.001) in maximal isometric force in FR was greater (p < 0.001) than that of 38.3 % in MR (p < 0.001) and force remained lower (p < 0.01) during the recovery in FR compared to MR. The larger decrease in isometric strength in FR than in MR was also associated with the decreased maximal voluntary EMG of the loaded muscles. The data indicate that the forced repetition exercise system induced greater acute hormonal and neuromuscular responses than a traditional maximum repetition exercise system and therefore it may be used to manipulate acute resistance exercise variables in athletes.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 418
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [31] ACUTE HEART RATE, BLOOD PRESSURE, AND RPE RESPONSES DURING SUPER SLOW VS. TRADITIONAL MACHINE RESISTANCE TRAINING PROTOCOLS USING SMALL MUSCLE GROUP EXERCISES
    Wickwire, P. Jason
    McLester, John R.
    Green, J. Matt
    Crews, Thad R.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2009, 23 (01) : 72 - 79
  • [32] The Acute Physiological Responses to Traditional vs. Practical Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Exercise in Untrained Men and Women
    Freitas, Eduardo D. S.
    Galletti, Bianca R. A.
    Koziol, Karolina J.
    Miller, Ryan M.
    Heishman, Aaron D.
    Black, Christopher D.
    Bemben, Debra
    Bemben, Michael G.
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [33] Autonomic Responses to an Acute Bout of High-Intensity Body Weight Resistance Exercise vs. Treadmill Running
    Kliszczewicz, Brian M.
    Esco, Michael R.
    Quindry, John C.
    Blessing, Daniel L.
    Oliver, Gretchen D.
    Taylor, Kyle J.
    Price, Brandi M.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2016, 30 (04) : 1050 - 1058
  • [34] Effects of Single Vs. Multiple Sets during 10 Weeks of Water-based Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Adaptations in Young Women
    Schoenell, M. C. W.
    Alberton, C. L.
    Tiggemann, C. L.
    Noll, M.
    Costa, R.
    Santos, N. S.
    Kruel, L. F. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 37 (10) : 813 - 818
  • [35] Effects of single- vs. multiple-set resistance training on maximum strength and body composition in trained postmenopausal women
    Kemmler, WK
    Lauber, D
    Engelke, K
    Weineck, J
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2004, 18 (04) : 689 - 694
  • [36] Acute Hormone Responses Subsequent to Agonist-Antagonist Paired Set vs. Traditional Straight Set Resistance Training
    Miranda, Humberto
    De Souza, Joao Antonio A. A.
    Scudese, Estevao
    Paz, Gabriel A.
    Salerno, Veronica P.
    Vigario, Patricia Dos Santos
    Willardson, Jeffrey M.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2020, 34 (06) : 1591 - 1599
  • [37] Acute Physiological Responses to High-Intensity Resistance Circuit Training vs. Traditional Strength Training in Soccer Players
    Marin-Pagan, Cristian
    Blazevich, Anthony J.
    Chung, Linda H.
    Romero-Arenas, Salvador
    Freitas, Tomas T.
    Alcaraz, Pedro E.
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2020, 9 (11): : 1 - 12
  • [38] Acute neuromuscular and hormonal responses to 20 versus 40% velocity loss in males and females before and after 8 weeks of velocity-loss resistance training
    Walker, Simon
    Hakkinen, Keijo
    Virtanen, Roosa
    Mane, Shashank
    Bachero-Mena, Beatriz
    Pareja-Blanco, Fernando
    EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 107 (09) : 1046 - 1060
  • [39] ACUTE PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES TO AN INTENSITY-AND TIME-UNDER-TENSION-EQUATED SINGLE-VS. MULTIPLE-SET RESISTANCE TRAINING BOUT IN TRAINED MEN
    Cintineo, Harry P.
    Freidenreich, Daniel J.
    Blaine, Caitlin M.
    Cardaci, Thomas D.
    Pellegrino, Joseph K.
    Arent, Shawn M.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2018, 32 (12) : 3310 - 3318