Repair of Less Than Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation During Left-Sided Valve Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

Background. This systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to investigate the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of concurrent repair of mild or moderate tricuspid regurgitation (TR) during left-sided valve surgery. Methods. Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Libraries were searched, and 12 studies were identified, comprising 1373 patients who underwent TR repair during left-sided valve surgery and 1553 patients who did not. Of these studies, 6 were classified as having a low risk of bias (randomized controlled trials or propensity-matched studies), and 6 were considered as having a high risk of bias (nonmatched observational studies). The primary analysis included only studies with a low risk of bias (399 repair and 426 nonrepair). Results. Primary analysis of studies at low risk of bias demonstrated that the addition of TR repair compared with nonrepair was associated with reduced risks of cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and progression of TR over a median of 5.3 years of follow-up (cardiovascular mortality: relative risk [RR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 0.75; P = .002; all-cause mortality: RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.96; P = .03; and TR progression: RR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.56; P < .001). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was significantly shorter in the nonrepair group (mean weighted difference, 18 minutes; 95% CI, 6 to 30; P = .003), although the risk of perioperative mortality was comparable between the 2 groups (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.27 to 1.97; P > .05). Conclusions. Concurrent repair of mild or moderate TR during left-sided valve surgery is associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes without adversely affecting early survival. Should these results be validated by ongoing trials, there should be a revision of current guidelines to recommend a more aggressive approach toward TR repair. (C) 2020 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons