Lipid formulations of amphotericin B: Clinical efficacy and toxicities

被引:257
|
作者
Wong-Beringer, A
Jacobs, RA
Guglielmo, BJ
机构
[1] Western Univ Hlth Sci, Coll Pharm, Pomona, CA 91766 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Pharm, Dept Clin Pharm, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Div Infect Dis, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/514704
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Commercially available lipid formulations of amphotericin B (Abelcet, Amphotec, and AmBisome) represent a significant advance in drug delivery technology. Differences in biochemical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties among the lipid products have been shown in in vitro and in vivo models. Clinical experience with these products has been primarily in patients either refractory to or intolerant of conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmBd). None of the lipid-based products demonstrates superior efficacy when prospectively compared with AmBd in the treatment of documented infections. When used for the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia, AmBisome significantly reduced the incidence of proven emergent fungal infections but did not improve shortterm survival rates, in comparison with AmBd. Acute infusion-related adverse events vary, whereas nephrotoxicity is reduced with all three lipid formulations. Until superior efficacy is clearly shown (for documented infections) or pharmacoeconomic analyses document the value of these drugs, use of such expensive agents should be highly restricted to those who are intolerant of or refractory to AmBd.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 618
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative efficacies, toxicities, and tissue concentrations of amphotericin B lipid formulations in a murine pulmonary aspergillosis model
    Olson, Jon A.
    Adler-Moore, Jill P.
    Schwartz, Julie
    Jensen, Gerard M.
    Proffitt, Richard T.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2006, 50 (06) : 2122 - 2131
  • [22] Antifungal susceptibility of Candida biofilms:: Unique efficacy of amphotericin B lipid formulations and echinocandins
    Kuhn, DM
    George, T
    Chandra, J
    Mukherjee, PK
    Ghannoum, MA
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 46 (06) : 1773 - 1780
  • [23] A prospective and retrospective analysis of the nephrotoxicity and efficacy of lipid-based amphotericin B formulations
    Cannon, JP
    Garey, KW
    Danziger, LH
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2001, 21 (09): : 1107 - 1114
  • [24] Lipid formulations of amphotericin
    Botero, Martha C.
    Puentes-Herrera, Marcela
    Cortes, Jorge A.
    REVISTA CHILENA DE INFECTOLOGIA, 2014, 31 (05): : 518 - 527
  • [25] Amphotericin B lipid soluble formulations versus amphotericin B in cancer patients with neutropenia
    Johansen, Helle Krogh
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (09):
  • [26] LIPID-BASED FORMULATIONS OF AMPHOTERICIN-B
    SWENSON, CE
    BOLCSAK, LE
    PERKINS, WR
    JANOFF, AS
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1995, 35 (05) : 709 - 711
  • [27] Lipid formulations of amphotericin B: where are we today?
    Antoniadou, A
    Dupont, B
    JOURNAL DE MYCOLOGIE MEDICALE, 2005, 15 (04): : 230 - 238
  • [28] Liposomal and lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B
    deMarie, S
    LEUKEMIA, 1996, 10 : S93 - S96
  • [29] A comparative review of conventional and lipid formulations of amphotericin B
    Robinson, RF
    Nahata, MC
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 24 (04) : 249 - 257
  • [30] Penetration of amphotericin B lipid formulations into pleural effusion
    Weiler, Stefan
    Bellmann-Weiler, Rosa
    Joannidis, Michael
    Bellmann, Rornuald
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2007, 51 (11) : 4211 - 4213