Comparative study by an expert panel of documents recognized for energy efficiency certification of buildings in Spain

被引:18
|
作者
Carpio, Manuel [1 ]
Martin-Morales, Maria [1 ]
Zamorano, Montserrat [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Dept Bldg Construct, ETS Ingn Edificac, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[2] Univ Granada, Dept Civil Engn, ETSI Caminos Canales & Puertos, E-18071 Granada, Spain
关键词
Energy certification; CO2; emissions; Thermal simulation; Energy efficiency; Buildings; CO2; EMISSIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.04.022
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Approval of the European Directive 2002/91/EU was followed by its reformulation in Directive 2010/31/EU, with reference to the Energy Performance of Buildings (EPBD). The partial transposition of this norm in Spain took place through Royal Decree 235/2013, which describes the Basic Procedure for the Energy Performance Certification of Buildings and acknowledges four different documents to certify the energy simulation of buildings: (i) CALENER VYP as the general method, and (ii) CE3, CEX and CERMA, as simplified methods. This study analyzes and compares these documents through the qualified opinions of a panel of 105 multidisciplinary professionals of the sector that determined the strengths and weaknesses. To this end a survey was drawn up, including aspects as diverse as: the background and professional characteristics of the experts, the types of residences studied, the characteristics of the documents, the means of processing documents, and the final results in terms of reports and energy certifications. Data analysis shows that most technicians prefer using programs with a simple interface-namely, the CEX. Although all the documents recognized are equally valid for energy certification, when certain types of residence are involved, there may be as much as a 26% difference in the determination of CO2 emissions. This translates into a higher or lower level in the final energy certification obtained for a building. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 103
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Energy efficiency in office buildings - An energy and system analysis study
    Nilson, A
    Hjalmarsson, C
    Uppstrom, R
    17TH AIVC CONFERENCE - OPTIMUM VENTILATION AND AIR FLOW CONTROL IN BUILDING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1996, : 367 - 378
  • [22] The region matters: A comparative analysis of regional energy efficiency in Spain
    Ruiz-Fuensanta, Maria J.
    ENERGY, 2016, 101 : 325 - 331
  • [23] Adapting Sustainability Certification Systems for Historic Buildings: A Qualitative Comparative Study in Denmark
    Karimi, Farzaneh
    Kamari, Aliakbar
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (20)
  • [24] A comparative study of energy and carbon efficiency for emerging countries using panel stochastic frontier analysis
    Jin, Taeyoung
    Kim, Jinsoo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [25] A comparative study of energy and carbon efficiency for emerging countries using panel stochastic frontier analysis
    Taeyoung Jin
    Jinsoo Kim
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [26] A comparative analysis of retrofitting historic buildings for energy efficiency in the UK and China
    Brooks, Elizabeth
    Law, Andrew
    Huang, Lingjiang
    DISP, 2014, 50 (03): : 66 - 75
  • [27] Energy efficiency of higher education buildings: a case study
    Soares, Nelson
    Pereira, Luisa Dias
    Ferreira, Joao
    Conceicao, Pedro
    da Silva, Patricia Pereira
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2015, 16 (05) : 669 - 691
  • [28] A study of energy efficiency in residential buildings in Knoxville, Tennessee
    Mardookhy, Minoo
    Sawhney, Rapinder
    Ji, Shuguang
    Zhu, Xiaojuan
    Zhou, Wenjun
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 85 : 241 - 249
  • [29] Energy efficiency and indoor thermal perception: a comparative study between radiant panel and portable convective heaters
    Ali, Ahmed Hamza H.
    Morsy, Mahmoud Gaber
    ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2010, 3 (04) : 283 - 301
  • [30] Energy efficiency and indoor thermal perception: a comparative study between radiant panel and portable convective heaters
    Ahmed Hamza H. Ali
    Mahmoud Gaber Morsy
    Energy Efficiency, 2010, 3 : 283 - 301