Report on a workshop concerning the cerebellum and motor learning, held in St Louis October 2004

A one-day meeting on the cerebellum and motor learning was held in St Louis (October 2004), to address issues arising from a previous larger meeting (Tuebingen, June 2004). The learning tasks considered were VOR adaptation, saccadic adaptation and eyeblink conditioning. A theoretical development was reported that indicated how the cerebellum could use sensory error signals for adaptive control, by decorrelating them from an efferent copy of motor commands. The main topics for discussion were the nature of the error signals actually used by the cerebellum, and the evidence for multiple sites of synaptic plasticity. Reports of studies on VOR adaptation confirmed the presence of error signals in addition to retinal slip, in particular the eye-movement related simple-spike firing of floccular PCs. This firing appears to drive synaptic plasticity in the vestibular nuclei. From a theoretical perspective, a second site of plasticity in the brainstem has two advantages: it improves the high-frequency performance of the VOR given a delayed slip signal, and it allows VOR adaptation when smooth pursuit effectively removes the retinal slip signal. In contrast, some of the physiological data reported on saccadic adaptation seemed incompatible with current theoretical ideas about error signals. However, since other reported data were broadly consistent with those ideas, an important area of experimental disagreement was identified. Furthermore, behavioural studies indicated the presence of multiple sites of plasticity, consistent with earlier lesion studies that suggested one such site within cerebellar cortex and another outside it. Data from eyeblink conditioning suggested that the predictability of the error signal was important. Related ideas have previously emerged from studies of skeletal movement, but their theoretical implications for the cerebellar algorithm have yet to be fully explored. Finally, the long-standing controversy concerning sites of plasticity in eyeblink conditioning illustrated the technical dffficulties involved in tracking down such sites.