Characteristics of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Use in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort

被引:2
|
作者
Bauer, Christina M. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xian [1 ]
Long, Millie D. [1 ,2 ]
Sandler, Robert S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Multidisciplinary Ctr Inflammatory Bowel Dis, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Crohn's disease; ulcerative colitis; inflammatory bowel disease; fecal microbiota transplant; ACTIVE ULCERATIVE-COLITIS; CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE; CROHNS-DISEASE; VALIDATION; GUIDELINES; REMISSION; EFFICACY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1093/crocol/otaa024
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is a growing interest in the role of gut bacteria in a number of diseases and an emerging hypothesis that inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is triggered by microbial dysbiosis in genetically susceptible individuals. Currently, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is utilized for the treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis. Data on the efficacy of FMT for IBD are mixed, but patients are interested in its use for the treatment of IBD. We sought to describe the use of FMT (self or medical professional administered) in individuals with IBD using IBD Partners, an Internet-based cohort. Methods: Patients enrolled in the IBD Partners cohort were offered the opportunity to complete an optional survey on the use of FMT between January 2017 to September 2018 (n = 5430). A cross-sectional analysis was performed within patients who completed the survey and did not have a pouch or ostomy. Patients' demographic characteristics, disease activity and phenotype, mode of FMT delivery, and patient-reported efficacy were compared. Results: Among 3274 eligible patients, 51 (1.6%) responded that they had an FMT in the past. Of patients undergoing FMT, 22 patients had the FMT for C. difficile while 29 reported that the FMT was for another indication. Most patients receiving FMT for an indication other than C. difficile had ulcerative colitis/indeterminate colitis (25, 86.2%). Colonoscopy (68.2%) and nasogastric tube (18.2%) were the most common routes of administration for patients receiving FMT for C. difficile colitis. Self-administration (72.4%) and enemas (17.2%) were the most common routes of administration in patients receiving FMT for an alternate indication. Patients reporting FMT for an indication other than C. difficile were less likely to have a physician directing their FMT treatment (20.6%) as compared to patients receiving FMT for C. difficile (86.3%). Patientreported efficacy was lower for FMT given for a non-C. difficile indication. Conclusions: Patients undergoing FMT for an indication other than C. difficile infection were more likely to have ulcerative colitis, selfadminister FMT, and were less likely to be receiving FMT under the guidance of a medical professional. FMT was not as effective for symptoms when given for a non-C. difficile indication. Patients should be counseled on potential harms and lack of proven benefit associated with FMT for IBD indications to try to discourage self-administered FMT without proper medical oversite. Lay Summary In a survey-based study of 3247 patients with inflammatory bowel disease, 51 reported having a fecal transplant in the past. Patients were more likely to self-administer the transplant and reported lower response rates if done for an indication other than C. difficile.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Insights into the role of fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease
    Levy, Alexander N.
    Allegretti, Jessica R.
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 12
  • [22] The Use and Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Refractory Clostridium difficile in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Gianotti, Robert J.
    Moss, Alan C.
    INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2016, 22 (11) : 2704 - 2710
  • [23] Specificities of the fecal microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease
    Sokol, H
    Seksik, P
    Rigottier-Gois, L
    Lay, C
    Lepage, P
    Podglajen, I
    Marteau, P
    Doré, J
    INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2006, 12 (02) : 106 - 111
  • [24] The role of the fecal microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease
    Khalaf, Rami
    Sciberras, Martina
    Ellul, Pierre
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 36 (11) : 1249 - 1258
  • [25] Exploring the Potential of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation as a Therapy in Tuberculosis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Boicean, Adrian
    Bratu, Dan
    Fleaca, Sorin Radu
    Vasile, Gligor
    Shelly, Leeb
    Birsan, Sabrina
    Bacila, Ciprian
    Hasegan, Adrian
    PATHOGENS, 2023, 12 (09):
  • [26] Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Improves the Quality of Life in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Wei, Yao
    Zhu, Weiming
    Gong, Jianfeng
    Guo, Dong
    Gu, Lili
    Li, Ning
    Li, Jieshou
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2015, 2015
  • [27] Cost-effectiveness analysis of fecal microbiota transplantation for inflammatory bowel disease
    Zhang, Ting
    Xiang, Jie
    Cui, Bota
    He, Zhi
    Li, Pan
    Chen, Hai
    Xu, Lijuan
    Ji, Guozhong
    Nie, Yongzhan
    Wu, Kaichun
    Fan, Daiming
    Huang, Guangming
    Bai, Jianling
    Zhang, Faming
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (51) : 88894 - 88903
  • [28] Probiotics, Prebiotics, Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, and Dietary Patterns in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Noguera-Fernandez, Noah
    Candela-Gonzalez, Joana
    Orenes-Pinero, Esteban
    MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH, 2024, 68 (18)
  • [29] Patient and Gastroenterologist Attitudes of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation as a Treatment for Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Dunleavy, Katie A.
    Stanley, Stephanie
    Hirten, Robert
    Sands, Bruce E.
    Grinspan, Ari M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115 : S450 - S450
  • [30] BILE ACID MALABSORPTION IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: SERUM METABOLOMICS, FECAL MICROBIOLOGY AND FECAL MICROBIOTA TRANSPLANTATION
    Lu, Gaochen
    Zhang, Sheng
    Wang, Weihong
    Wu, Xia
    Li, Pan
    Zhang, Faming
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 166 (05) : S115 - S115