Empirical Performance Analysis of Decision Tree and Support Vector Machine based Classifiers on Biological Databases

被引:0
|
作者
Amjad, Muhammad [1 ]
Ali, Zulfiqar [3 ]
Rafiq, Abid [1 ]
Akhtar, Nadeem [2 ]
Israr-Ur-Rehman [4 ]
Abbas, Ali [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sargodha, Dept Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Sargodha, Pakistan
[2] Univ Lahore UOL, Dept Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Lahore, Pakistan
[3] UCP, Dept Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Lahore, Pakistan
[4] Islamia Coll Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Peshawar, Pakistan
关键词
Classification; rules discovery; support vector machine; decision tree;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The classification and prediction of medical diseases is a cutting edge research problem in the medical field. The experts of machine learning are continuously proposing new classification methods for the prediction of diseases. The discovery of classification rules from medical databases for classification and prediction of diseases is a challenging and non-trivial task. It is very significant to investigate the more promising and efficient classification approaches for the discovery of classification rules from the medical databases. This paper focuses on the problem of selection of more efficient, promising and suitable classifier for the prediction of specific diseases by performing empirical studies on bunch mark medical databases. The research work under the focus concentrates on the benchmark medical data sets i.e. arrhythmia, breast-cancer, diabetes, hepatitis, mammography, lymph, liver-disorders, sick, cardiotocography, heart-statlog, breast-w, and lung-cancer. The medical data sets are obtained from the open-source UCI machine learning repository. The research work will be investigating the performance of Decision Tree (i.e. AdaBoost.NC, C45-C, CART, and ID3-C) and Support Vector Machines. For experimentation, Knowledge Extraction based on Evolutionary Learning (KEEL), a data mining tool will be used. This research work provides the empirical performance analysis of decision tree-based classifiers and SVM on a specific dataset. Moreover, this article provides a comparative performance analysis of classification approaches in terms of statistics.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 318
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cascade jump support vector machine classifiers
    Ravindran, S
    Anderson, DV
    Rehg, J
    2005 IEEE WORKSHOP ON MACHINE LEARNING FOR SIGNAL PROCESSING (MLSP), 2005, : 135 - 139
  • [32] Support vector machine classifiers for asymmetric proximities
    Muñoz, A
    de Diego, IM
    Moguerza, JM
    ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS AND NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING - ICAN/ICONIP 2003, 2003, 2714 : 217 - 224
  • [33] Least squares support vector machine classifiers
    Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT-SISTA Kardinaal, Mercierlaan 94, B-3001 Leuven , Belgium
    Neural Process Letters, 3 (293-300):
  • [34] Moderating the outputs of support vector machine classifiers
    IEEE
    不详
    IEEE Trans Neural Networks, 5 (1018-1031):
  • [35] Multicategory Proximal Support Vector Machine Classifiers
    Glenn M. Fung
    O. L. Mangasarian
    Machine Learning, 2005, 59 : 77 - 97
  • [36] Least Squares Support Vector Machine Classifiers
    J.A.K. Suykens
    J. Vandewalle
    Neural Processing Letters, 1999, 9 : 293 - 300
  • [37] Least squares support vector machine classifiers
    Suykens, JAK
    Vandewalle, J
    NEURAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 1999, 9 (03) : 293 - 300
  • [38] Support vector machine tree based on feature selection
    Xu, Qinzhen
    Pei, Wenjiang
    Yang, Luxi
    He, Zhenya
    NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING, PT 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4232 : 856 - 863
  • [39] Intensified Analysis and Comparison of 5 Flacicirus with the use of Decision Tree and Support Vector Machine (SVM)
    Yang, Eujin
    Gu, Bokyung
    Yoon, Taeseon
    2017 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY (ICACT) - OPENING NEW ERA OF SMART SOCIETY, 2017, : 526 - 529
  • [40] Multicategory proximal support vector machine classifiers
    Fung, GM
    Mangasarian, OL
    MACHINE LEARNING, 2005, 59 (1-2) : 77 - 97