Comparing self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy with clinic management -: A randomized trial

被引:139
|
作者
Menéndez-Jándula, B
Souto, JC
Oliver, A
Montserrat, I
Quintana, M
Glch, I
Bonfill, X
Fontcuberta, J
机构
[1] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Unitat Hemostasia & Trombosi, Barcelona 08025, Spain
[2] Fdn Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-142-1-200501040-00006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: control of oral anticoagulant treatment has been reported to be suboptimal, but previous studies suggest that patient self-management improves control. Objective: To compare the quality of control and the clinical outcomes of oral anticoagulant treatment in self-managed patients versus patients following conventional management. Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Setting: University-affiliated hospital in Spain. Patients: 737 patients with indications for anticoagulant treatment. Intervention: The self-management group (n = 368) received simple instructions for using a portable coagulometer weekly and self-adjusting treatment dose. The conventional management group (n = 369) received usual care in an anticoagulation clinic (monthly measurement and control of international normalized ratio [INR], managed by hematologists). Measurements: Percentage of INR values within the target range and major related complications. Results: The median follow-up period was 11.8 months (range, 0.3 to 16.9 months). The unadjusted percentages of in-range INRs were 58.6% in the self-management group and 55.6% in the conventional management group (difference, 3.0 percentage points [95% CI, 0.4 to 5.4 percentage points]). Twenty-seven patients (7.3%) in the conventional management group and 8 (2.2%) in the self-management group had major complications related to anticoagulant treatment. The unadjusted risk difference for major complications between groups was 5.1 percentage points (exact 95% CI, 1.7 to 8.5 percentage points). Fewer patients had minor hemorrhages in the self-management group (14.9%) than in the conventional management group (36.4%). Fifteen patients (4.1%) in the conventional management group and 6 (1.6%) in the self-management group died (unadjusted risk difference, 2.5 percentage points [exact 95% CI, 0.0 to 5.1 percentage points]). Limitations: The trial was performed at only 1 center and was not blinded. The dropout rate in the intervention group was 21%. Conclusions: Compared with conventional management by an anticoagulation clinic, self-management of oral anticoagulant treatment achieved a similar level of control. Of note, major complications and minor hemorrhages were less common in the self-management group.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A protocol for a cluster randomized trial comparing strategies for translating self-management support into primary care practices
    W. Perry Dickinson
    L. Miriam Dickinson
    Bonnie T. Jortberg
    Danielle M. Hessler
    Douglas H. Fernald
    Lawrence Fisher
    BMC Family Practice, 19
  • [42] A protocol for a cluster randomized trial comparing strategies for translating self-management support into primary care practices
    Dickinson, W. Perry
    Dickinson, L. Miriam
    Jortberg, Bonnie T.
    Hessler, Danielle M.
    Fernald, Douglas H.
    Fisher, Lawrence
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 19
  • [43] Management of oral anticoagulant therapy in Italy
    Berrettini, M
    Agnelli, G
    SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 1999, 25 (01): : 27 - 31
  • [44] Perioperative management of oral anticoagulant therapy
    Sandset, PM
    Abildgaard, U
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2002, 108 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [45] Oral anticoagulation therapy in children: Successfully controlled by self-management
    Christensen, TD
    Andersen, NT
    Maegaard, M
    Hansen, OK
    Hjortdal, VE
    Hasenkam, JM
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2004, 7 (04): : E321 - E325
  • [46] MANAGEMENT OF ORAL ANTICOAGULANT TREATMENT IN AN OUTPATIENT-CLINIC
    SENDEROWICZ, J
    QUIT, M
    SHABAD, E
    AGHAI, E
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 1995, 73 (06) : 1118 - 1118
  • [47] Self management of oral anticoagulant therapy after heart valve replacement
    Hasenkam, JM
    Kimose, HH
    Knudsen, L
    Gronnesby, H
    Halborg, J
    Christensen, TD
    Attermann, J
    Pilegaard, HK
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 1997, 11 (05) : 935 - 941
  • [48] Are portable coagulometers adequate for patient self management of oral anticoagulant therapy?
    Attermann, J
    Kynde, K
    Hasenkam, JM
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 1999, : 547 - 547
  • [49] Oral anticoagulation self-management and management by a specialist anticoagulation clinic:: a randomised cross-over comparison
    Cromheecke, ME
    Levi, M
    Colly, LP
    de Mol, BJM
    Prins, MH
    Hutten, BA
    Mak, R
    Keyzers, KCJ
    Büller, HR
    LANCET, 2000, 356 (9224): : 97 - 102
  • [50] A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Telehealth Self-Management to Standard Outpatient Management in Underserved Black and Hispanic Patients Living with Heart Failure
    Pekmezaris, Renee
    Nouryan, Christian N.
    Schwartz, Rebecca
    Castillo, Stacy
    Makaryus, Amgad N.
    Ahern, Deborah
    Akerman, Meredith B.
    Lesser, Martin L.
    Bauer, Lorinda
    Murray, Lawrence
    Pecinka, Kathleen
    Zeltser, Roman
    Zhang, Meng
    DiMarzio, Paola
    TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2019, 25 (10) : 917 - 925