Prognostic significance of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for middle-low rectal cancer patients with lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis: a propensity score matching study

被引:18
|
作者
Zhou, Sicheng [1 ]
Jiang, Yujuan [1 ]
Pei, Wei [1 ]
Liang, Jianwei [1 ]
Zhou, Zhixiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Colorectal Surg, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc,Canc Hosp, 17 Panjiayuan South Lane, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
关键词
Rectal cancer; Later pelvic lymph node dissection; Later pelvic lymph node metastasis; Prognosis; Region; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; BENEFIT; MULTICENTER; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-022-09254-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background There is still controversy regarding the clinical value and significance of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) dissection (LPND). The present study aimed to investigate whether the addition of LPND to total mesorectal excision (TME) confers survival benefits in rectal cancer patients with clinical lateral pelvic node metastasis (LPNM). Methods From January 2015 to January 2021, a total of 141 rectal cancer patients with clinical evidence of LPNM who underwent TME + LPND were retrospectively analysed and divided into the LPNM group (n = 29) and the non-LPNM group (n = 112). The LPNM group was further subdivided into a high-risk LPNM group (n = 14) and a low-risk LPNM group (n = 15). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize selection bias. The primary outcomes of this study were 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results Of the 141 patients undergoing LPND, the local recurrence rate of patients with LPNM was significantly higher than that of patients without LPNM both before (27.6% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.001) and after (27.6% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.025) PSM. Multivariate analysis revealed that LPNM was an independent risk factor for not only OS (HR: 3.06; 95% CI, 1.15-8.17; P = 0.025) but also DFS (HR: 2.39; 95% CI, 1.18-4.87; P = 0.016) in patients with LPNM after TME + LPND. When the LPNM group was further subdivided, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that OS and DFS were significantly better in the low-risk group (obturator/internal iliac artery region and < 2 positive LPNs). Conclusion Even after LPND, LPNM patients have a poor prognosis. Moreover, LPNM is an independent poor prognostic factor affecting OS and DFS after TME + LPND. However, LPND appears to confer survival benefits to specific patients with single LPN involvement in the obturator region or internal iliac vessel region. Furthermore, LPND may have no indication in stage IV patients and should be selected carefully.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prognostic Value of Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis
    Liu, Yang
    Shang, Liang
    Zhou, Chunyang
    Fang, Zhen
    Du, Fengying
    Wu, Hao
    Li, Leping
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 267 : 414 - 423
  • [32] Risk factors and prognostic significance of postoperative complications following lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer: results of the multicenter lateral node study in China
    Zhou, Sicheng
    Tang, Jianqiang
    Mei, Shiwen
    Lou, Zheng
    Fu, Wei
    Feng, Bo
    Yang, Yingchi
    Sun, Yi
    Liu, Qian
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 52 (10) : 1150 - 1158
  • [33] Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer - a video vignette
    Karachun, A.
    Berlev, I.
    Petrov, A.
    Panaiotti, L.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 20 (04) : 358 - 358
  • [34] Recurrence of rectal cancer on the pelvic sidewall after lateral lymph node dissection
    Takao, Misato
    Kawai, Kazushige
    Nakano, Daisuke
    Dejima, Akira
    Nakamori, Sakiko
    Natsume, Soichiro
    Ise, Ichiro
    Kato, Hiroki
    Yamaguchi, Tatsuro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2024, 39 (01)
  • [35] Robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in rectal cancer - a video vignette
    Sasi, S.
    Rohila, J.
    Kammar, P.
    Kurunkar, S.
    Desouza, A.
    Saklani, A.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 20 (06) : 554 - 555
  • [36] Laparoscopic treatment of rectal cancer and lateral pelvic lymph node dissection: are they obsolete?
    Toda, Shigeo
    Kuroyanagi, Hiroya
    Matoba, Shuichiro
    Hiramatsu, Kosuke
    Okazaki, Naoto
    Tate, Tomohiro
    Tomizawa, Kenji
    Hanaoka, Yutaka
    Moriyama, Jin
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2018, 73 (06) : 558 - 573
  • [37] Incidence and prognostic significance of lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with advanced low rectal cancer
    Ueno, M
    Oya, M
    Azekura, K
    Yamaguchi, T
    Muto, T
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (06) : 756 - 763
  • [38] Exploratory analysis of lateral pelvic sentinel lymph node status for optimal management of laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection in advanced lower rectal cancer without suspected lateral lymph node metastasis
    Masayoshi Yasui
    Masayuki Ohue
    Shingo Noura
    Norikatsu Miyoshi
    Yusuke Takahashi
    Chu Matsuda
    Junichi Nishimura
    Naotsugu Haraguchi
    Hajime Ushigome
    Nozomu Nakai
    Shiki Fujino
    Keijiro Sugimura
    Hiroshi Wada
    Hidenori Takahashi
    Takeshi Omori
    Hiroshi Miyata
    BMC Cancer, 21
  • [39] Exploratory analysis of lateral pelvic sentinel lymph node status for optimal management of laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection in advanced lower rectal cancer without suspected lateral lymph node metastasis
    Yasui, Masayoshi
    Ohue, Masayuki
    Noura, Shingo
    Miyoshi, Norikatsu
    Takahashi, Yusuke
    Matsuda, Chu
    Nishimura, Junichi
    Haraguchi, Naotsugu
    Ushigome, Hajime
    Nakai, Nozomu
    Fujino, Shiki
    Sugimura, Keijiro
    Wada, Hiroshi
    Takahashi, Hidenori
    Omori, Takeshi
    Miyata, Hiroshi
    BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [40] Risk factors of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in advanced rectal cancer
    Shin Fujita
    Seiichiro Yamamoto
    Takayuki Akasu
    Yoshihiro Moriya
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2009, 24 : 1085 - 1090