Life Cycle Assessment Analysis and Comparison of 1000 MW S-CO2Coal Fired Power Plant and 1000 MW USC Water-Steam Coal-Fired Power Plant

被引:20
|
作者
Li, Mingjia [1 ]
Wang, Ge [2 ]
Xu, Jinliang [2 ]
Ni, Jingwei [1 ]
Sun, Enhui [2 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Key Lab Thermofluid Sci & Engn, Minist Educ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab Multiphase Flow & Heat Transfer L, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
S-CO(2)power plant; ultra-supercritical water-steam Rankine cycle power plant; life cycle assessment; energy efficiency; environment impact; economic performance; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; BRAYTON CYCLE; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; CO2; PERFORMANCE; OPTIMIZATION; LAYOUTS; CAPTURE;
D O I
10.1007/s11630-020-1327-x
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this paper is to understand the benefits that one can achieve for large-scale supercritical CO2(S-CO2) coal-fired power plants. The aspects of energy environment and economy of 1000 MW S-CO(2)coal-fired power generation system and 1000 MW ultra-supercritical (USC) water-steam Rankine cycle coal-fired power generation system are analyzed and compared at the similar main vapor parameters, by adopting the neural network genetic algorithm and life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Multi-objective optimization of the 1000 MW S-CO(2)coal-fired power generation system is further carried out. The power generation efficiency, environmental impact load, and investment recovery period are adopted as the objective functions. The main vapor parameters of temperature and pressure are set as the decision variables. The results are concluded as follows. First, the total energy consumption of the S-CO(2)coal-fired power generation system is 10.48 MJ/kWh and the energy payback ratio is 34.37%. The performance is superior to the USC coal-fired power generation system. Second, the resource depletion index of the S-CO(2)coal-fired power generation system is 4.38 mu PRchina,90, which is lower than that of the USC coal-fired power generation system, and the resource consumption is less. Third, the environmental impact load of the S-CO(2)coal-fired power generation system is 0.742 mPE(china,90), which is less than that of the USC coal-fired power generation system, 0.783 mPE(china,90). Among all environmental impact types, human toxicity potential HTP and global warming potential GWP account for the most environmental impact. Finally, the investment cost of the S-CO(2)coal-fired power generation system is generally less than that of the USC coal-fired power generation system because the cost of the S-CO(2)turbine is only half of the cost of the steam turbine. The optimal turbine inlet temperatureT(5)becomes smaller, and the optimal turbine inlet pressure is unchanged at 622.082 degrees C/30 MPa.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 484
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Study on the Economic Operation of a 1000 MWe Coal-Fired Power Plant with CO2 Capture
    Yang, Jinning
    Wang, Chaowei
    Xu, Dong
    Yu, Xuehai
    Yang, Yang
    Wang, Zhiyong
    Wu, Xiao
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (19)
  • [22] I and C design of 300 MW coal-fired demonstrative power plant
    Tang, Zhining
    Zhongguo Dianli/Electric Power, 2001, 34 (12):
  • [23] Optimization model of steam coal blending in coal-fired power plant
    Zhao, Jian
    Liu, Shi-Xin
    Dongbei Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northeastern University, 2015, 36 (10): : 1388 - 1392
  • [24] Energy consumption and energy-saving potential analysis of pollutant abatement systems in a 1000-MW coal-fired power plant
    Yang, Hang
    Zhang, Yongxin
    Zheng, Chenghang
    Wu, Xuecheng
    Chen, Linghong
    Gao, Xiang
    Fu, Joshua S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2018, 68 (09) : 920 - 930
  • [25] Comparison and Analysis of CO2 Capture Technology of Coal-fired Power Plant
    Wang, Chao
    Chen, ShenQian
    Ren, JianXing
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICS, DYNAMIC SYSTEMS AND MATERIAL ENGINEERING (MDSME 2015), 2015, : 113 - 116
  • [26] System Integration and Flowsheet Optimization of 1000 MW Coal-fired Supercritical Power Generation Units
    Huang, Shengwei
    Xu, Gang
    Yang, Yongping
    Zhang, Chenxu
    Wang, Ligang
    Wang, Ningling
    Yang, Zhiping
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, ICAE2014, 2014, 61 : 1816 - 1819
  • [27] Simulator Development of 1000MW Class Ultra Super Critical Coal-Fired Power Plant with advanced control algorithm
    Oh, Ki-Yong
    Lim, Geon-Pyo
    Kim, HoYol
    IMETI 2008: INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 339 - +
  • [28] Coupling of bromide and on-line mechanical modified fly ash for mercury removal at a 1000 MW coal-fired power plant
    Wang, Shumin
    Zhang, Yongsheng
    Gu, Yongzheng
    Wang, Jiawei
    Yu, Xuehai
    Wang, Tao
    Sun, Zhongchun
    Liu, Zhao
    Romero, Carlos E.
    Pan, Wei-ping
    FUEL, 2019, 247 : 179 - 186
  • [29] INVESTIGATION ON ASH FOULING FORMATION OF INDUCED FAN BLADE AND HEAT EXCHANGER SURFACE IN A 1000 MW COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT
    Liu, He-Xin
    Xiao, Jia-Fan
    Tan, Hou-Zhang
    Wang, Yi-Bin
    Yang, Fu-Xin
    THERMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 24 (06): : 3477 - 3488
  • [30] A Comparative Study on Methods used in Life Cycle Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Plant
    Das, U.
    Nandi, C.
    De, D.
    Das, S.
    Nandi, S. S.
    THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 71 (07) : 617 - 630