WATER CONSERVATION POTENTIAL OF LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION SMART CONTROLLERS

被引:0
|
作者
Dukes, M. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
ET; Evapotranspiration; Irrigation Association; Irrigation controller; Smart Water Application Technologies; SMS; Soil moisture sensor; SENSOR-BASED AUTOMATION; WEATHER CONDITIONS; BERMUDAGRASS; SAVINGS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
In the past ten years, smart irrigation controllers have been developed by a number of manufacturers and have been promoted by water purveyors in an attempt to reduce excessive irrigation. Legislation has been introduced in California and Texas and passed in Florida mandating or incentivizing the use of these controllers. As a result of the interest in smart controllers, their use is increasing in new installations and retrofits of residential and light commercial irrigation systems. A number of controlled research studies using formal experimental design and statistical analyses indicate substantial water savings of anywhere from 40% to more than 70% when using these devices; however, real-world savings in larger pilot-scale projects indicate savings of typically less than 10%. Reasons for the divergence between the apparent potential savings and the realized savings in pilot projects are related to the lack of targeting of high irrigation users (on either a relative or absolute scale), education for contractors and end users, and timely follow-up to assess water savings. In addition, much of the scientific research on smart controllers has been conducted in humid regions where higher potential savings are likely due to irrigation needed only to supplement rainfall. Future pilot projects should include comprehensive educational components aimed at irrigation sites with potential irrigation savings based on estimated landscape irrigation demand from climatic variables (i.e., high irrigation users).
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 569
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Landscape Irrigation Conservation—a Pilot Study
    Hawn, Joellyn
    Opflow, 1998, 24 (03): : 12 - 13
  • [22] Water Source as a Driver of Landscape Irrigation Conservation Behavior: A Statewide Florida Study
    Warner, Laura A.
    Chaudhary, Anil Kumar
    Krimsky, Lisa
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 146 (08)
  • [23] Perceived Landscape Benefits Inform Home Irrigation Users' Water Conservation Behaviors
    Warner, Laura A.
    Ali, Amanda D.
    Chaudhary, Anil Kumar
    HORTSCIENCE, 2017, 52 (09) : S24 - S25
  • [24] Evaluation of weather-sensing landscape irrigation controllers
    不详
    HORTSCIENCE, 2005, 40 (04) : 1078 - 1078
  • [25] Balancing smart irrigation and hydropower investments for sustainable water conservation in the Indus basin
    Ilyas, Ansir
    Parkinson, Simon
    Vinca, Adriano
    Byers, Edward
    Manzoor, Talha
    Riahi, Keywan
    Willaarts, Barbara
    Siddiqi, Afreen
    Muhammad, Abubakr
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2022, 135 : 147 - 161
  • [26] Evaluating Florida Homeowner Response to Smart Irrigation Controllers
    Morera, Maria C.
    Monaghan, Paul F.
    Dukes, Michael D.
    Wells, Ondine
    Davis, Stacia L.
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 25 (04) : 511 - 521
  • [27] Evolving response to smart irrigation controllers in high water-use central Florida homes
    Morera, Maria C.
    Monaghan, Paul F.
    Dukes, Michael D.
    AWWA WATER SCIENCE, 2019, 1 (01):
  • [28] Assessing Residential Outdoor Water Conservation Potential Using Landscape Water Budgets
    Lewis, Alan C.
    Khedun, C. Prakash
    Kaiser, Ronald A.
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 148 (06)
  • [29] Landscape Irrigation and Water Conservation in Urban Areas: An Analysis of Information-based Strategies
    Yue, Chengyan
    Cui, Manlin
    Kong, Xiangwen
    Watkins, Eric
    Barnes, Mike
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 32 (02) : 213 - +
  • [30] Classifying Residents who use Landscape Irrigation: Implications for Encouraging Water Conservation Behavior
    Laura A. Warner
    Alexa J. Lamm
    Joy N. Rumble
    Emmett T. Martin
    Randall Cantrell
    Environmental Management, 2016, 58 : 238 - 253