Mastery Learning - does the method of learning make a difference in skills acquisition for robotic surgery?

被引:2
|
作者
Siroen, Karen L. [1 ]
Ward, Christopher D. W. [1 ]
Escoto, Abelardo [1 ]
Naish, Michael D. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Bureau, Yves [3 ]
Patel, Rajni V. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Schlachta, Christopher M. [1 ,5 ]
Cristancho, Sayra M. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Trejos, Ana Luisa [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Canadian Surg Technol & Adv Robot, London Hlth Sci Ctr, 339 Windermere Rd, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Mech & Mat Engn, London, ON, Canada
[3] Western Univ, Med Biophys, London, ON, Canada
[4] Western Univ, Elect & Comp Engn, London, ON, Canada
[5] Western Univ, Surg, London, ON, Canada
[6] Western Univ, Fac Educ, London, ON, Canada
[7] Western Univ, CERI, London, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大创新基金会;
关键词
da Vinci; mastery learning; robotic surgery; simulator; surgical training; SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/rcs.1828
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Few studies compare the effectiveness of blocked vs random practice conditions in minimally invasive surgery training, and none have evaluated these in robotic surgery training. Methods: The dV-Trainer (R) and the da Vinci (R) Surgical System (dVSS) were used to compare practice conditions. Forty-two participants were randomized into blocked and random practice groups. Each participant performed five tasks: Ring Walk, Thread the Rings, Needle Targeting, Suture Sponge and Tubes Level 2. Transfer to the dVSS was also assessed. Results: No significant differences were observed between the two groups, except for a few instances. For example, during Ring Walk, the random group performed significantly faster than the blocked group (100.78 +/- 5.26 s vs 121.59 +/- 5.26 s, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The study results do not follow the current evidence presented in the education literature. This is the first time that blocked versus random practice was tested for robotic surgery training.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条