Mastery Learning - does the method of learning make a difference in skills acquisition for robotic surgery?

被引：2

作者：

Siroen, Karen L. ^{[1
]}

Ward, Christopher D. W. ^{[1
]}

Escoto, Abelardo ^{[1
]}

Naish, Michael D. ^{[1
,2
,4
]}

Bureau, Yves ^{[3
]}

Patel, Rajni V. ^{[1
,4
,5
]}

Schlachta, Christopher M. ^{[1
,5
]}

Cristancho, Sayra M. ^{[5
,6
,7
]}

Trejos, Ana Luisa ^{[1
,4
]}

机构：

[1] Canadian Surg Technol & Adv Robot, London Hlth Sci Ctr, 339 Windermere Rd, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada

[2] Western Univ, Mech & Mat Engn, London, ON, Canada

[3] Western Univ, Med Biophys, London, ON, Canada

[4] Western Univ, Elect & Comp Engn, London, ON, Canada

[5] Western Univ, Surg, London, ON, Canada

[6] Western Univ, Fac Educ, London, ON, Canada

[7] Western Univ, CERI, London, ON, Canada

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY | 2017年 / 13卷 / 04期

基金：

加拿大创新基金会;

关键词：

da Vinci; mastery learning; robotic surgery; simulator; surgical training; SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY;

D O I：

10.1002/rcs.1828

中图分类号：

R61 [外科手术学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background: Few studies compare the effectiveness of blocked vs random practice conditions in minimally invasive surgery training, and none have evaluated these in robotic surgery training. Methods: The dV-Trainer (R) and the da Vinci (R) Surgical System (dVSS) were used to compare practice conditions. Forty-two participants were randomized into blocked and random practice groups. Each participant performed five tasks: Ring Walk, Thread the Rings, Needle Targeting, Suture Sponge and Tubes Level 2. Transfer to the dVSS was also assessed. Results: No significant differences were observed between the two groups, except for a few instances. For example, during Ring Walk, the random group performed significantly faster than the blocked group (100.78 +/- 5.26 s vs 121.59 +/- 5.26 s, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The study results do not follow the current evidence presented in the education literature. This is the first time that blocked versus random practice was tested for robotic surgery training.

引用

页数：10

共 50 条

[1] Robotic Colorectal Surgery: Does It Really Make a Difference?
Hensley, Bradley J.
Probst, Christian P.
Aquina, Christopher T.
Becerra, Adan Z.
Noyes, Katia
Monson, John R.
Fleming, Fergal
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 148 (04) : S1176 - S1177
[2] Games for Learning: Does Gender Make a Difference?
Boyle, Elizabeth
Connolly, Thomas
2ND EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON GAMES BASED LEARNING, 2008, : 69 - 76
[3] Learning to listen: does intervention make a difference?
Lotfi, Ghazal
Maftoon, Parviz
Birjandi, Parviz
LANGUAGE LEARNING JOURNAL, 2016, 44 (01): : 107 - 123
[4] GENDER AND LEARNING - DOES EMOTION MAKE A DIFFERENCE
INGLETON, C
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1995, 30 (03) : 323 - 335
[5] The context of learning anatomy: does it make a difference?
Smith, Claire F.
Martinez-Alvarez, Concepcion
McHanwell, Stephen
JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 2014, 224 (03) : 270 - 278
[6] Learning Climate and Workplace Learning Does Work Restructuring Make a Difference?
Nikolova, Irina
Van Ruysseveldt, Joris
Van Dam, Karen
De Witte, Hans
JOURNAL OF PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 15 (02) : 66 - 75
[7] Does Peer-to-Peer Mentoring Make a Difference in Therapeutic Knowledge Acquisition for Student Learning?
Huang, T. B.
Ho, C.
Sing, Paw Cho E.
Vinh, M.
Lee, A.
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2016, 69 (01): : 66 - 66
[8] Frequent assessment: Does it make a difference in student learning?
Wallace, Andrea
ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 249
[9] DOES TEACHER CREATIVITY MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN PUPIL LEARNING
YAMAMOTO, K
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JOURNAL, 1967, 67 (05): : 265 - 270
[10] Conceptions of learning and knowledge: Does training make a difference?
Lonka, K
Joram, E
Bryson, M
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 21 (03) : 240 - 260

← 1 2 3 4 5 →