Quality of life after intervention with a cochlear implant or hearing aid

被引:58
|
作者
Contrera, Kevin J. [1 ]
Betz, Joshua [2 ]
Li, Lingsheng [3 ]
Blake, Caitlin R. [2 ]
Sung, Yoon K. [4 ]
Choi, Janet S. [1 ]
Lin, Frank R. [2 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Ctr Aging & Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Coll Med, Oklahoma City, OK 73190 USA
[4] Drexel Univ, Coll Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Geriatr Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Mental Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
LARYNGOSCOPE | 2016年 / 126卷 / 09期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Quality of life; mental health; hearing impairment; hearing aid; cochlear implant; NUTRITION EXAMINATION SURVEY; NATIONAL-HEALTH; LOSS PREVALENCE; OLDER-ADULTS; US ADULTS; IMPAIRMENT; SF-36; PEOPLE; ASSOCIATION; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1002/lary.25848
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives/HypothesisTo investigate the impact of hearing aid and cochlear implant use on quality of life in adults. Study DesignProspective observational cohort study. MethodsOne hundred thirteen adults aged 50 years with postlingual hearing loss receiving routine clinical care at a tertiary academic medical center were evaluated with the Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 before and 6 and 12 months after intervention with hearing aids or cochlear implants. Change in score was assessed using linear mixed effect models adjusted for age, gender, education, and history of hypertension, diabetes, and smoking. ResultsA significant increase in Mental Component Summary score was observed in both hearing aid and cochlear implant users from baseline to 12 months, with cochlear implant users increasing nearly twice that of hearing aid users (hearing aid: 2.49 [95% confidence interval: 0.11, 4.88], P = .041; cochlear implant: 4.20 [95% confidence interval: 1.85, 6.55], P < .001). The most substantial increases were observed in individuals with the lowest baseline scores. There was no significant difference in physical component summary score from baseline to 12 months. ConclusionsTreatment of hearing loss with hearing aids and cochlear implants results in significant increases in mental health quality of life. The majority of the increase is observed by 6 months post-treatment, and we observed differential effects of treatment depending on the level of baseline quality of life score with the greatest gains observed in those with the lowest scores. Level of Evidence2b. Laryngoscope, 126:2110-2115, 2016
引用
收藏
页码:2110 / 2115
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of self-esteem in hearing aid and cochlear implant users
    Sema Satici
    Ufuk Derinsu
    Esra Akdeniz
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2023, 280 : 2735 - 2740
  • [32] Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: Speech perception and localization
    Tyler, RS
    Parkinson, AJ
    Wilson, BS
    Witt, S
    Preece, JP
    Noble, W
    EAR AND HEARING, 2002, 23 (02): : 98 - 105
  • [33] Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid
    Veugen, Lidwien C. E.
    Hendrikse, Maartje M. E.
    van Wanrooij, Marc M.
    Agterberg, Martijn J. H.
    Chalupper, Josef
    Mens, Lucas H. M.
    Snik, Ad F. M.
    van Opstal, A. John
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2016, 336 : 72 - 82
  • [34] Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users
    Looi, Valerie
    McDermott, Hugh
    Mckay, Colette
    Hickson, Louise
    EAR AND HEARING, 2008, 29 (03): : 421 - 434
  • [35] Cochlear implant plus hearing aid: measuring binaural benefit in children
    Godar, SP
    Litovsky, RY
    Johnstone, PM
    Agrawal, SS
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS, 2004, 1273 : 219 - 222
  • [36] Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth on Speech Recognition Performance of Listeners Using a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid (Bimodal Hearing)
    Neuman, Arlene C.
    Svirsky, Mario A.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2013, 34 (05): : 553 - 561
  • [37] Quality of Life after Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation: An Updated Comprehensive Cochlear Implant Questionnaire
    Nahm, Edmund A.
    Liberatos, Penny
    Shi, Qiuhu
    Lai, Erica
    Kim, Ana H.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2017, 156 (02) : 334 - 340
  • [38] Profound Mixed Hearing Loss: Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid System or Cochlear Implant?
    Verhaegen, Veronique J. O.
    Mulder, Jef J. S.
    Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
    Cremers, Cor W. R. J.
    Snik, Ad F. M.
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2009, 118 (10): : 693 - 697
  • [39] A comparative study on the general health of the mothers of children with cochlear implant, hearing aid, and normal hearing
    Gohari, Nasrin
    Sajadi, Ebtesam
    Azvantash, Zoleikha
    Khavarghazalani, Bahare
    AUDITORY AND VESTIBULAR RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (02): : 117 - 121
  • [40] Binaural-bimodal hearing: Concomitant use of a unilateral cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid
    Luntz, M
    Shpak, T
    Weiss, H
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2005, 125 (08) : 863 - 869